Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?

[EMH]

Where did you get that idea dufus ?

Sick moronic poster, you are a COWARD and a LIAR and YOU CANNOT ANSWER THE QUESTION PUT TO YOU...

 

[Dagosa]

Sick moronic poster, you are a COWARD and a LIAR and YOU CANNOT ANSWER THE QUESTION PUT TO YOU...

You made the statement….Answer the question. Dufus. You can’t tell us how you came to that idea…did you just make it up, or do you have proof ?

 

[EMH]

You made the statement….Answer the question. Dufus. You can’t tell us how you came to that idea…did you just make it up, or do you have proof ?

You mean, how dare I observe a MAP of the ARCTIC, notice where there is ICE AGE GLACIER and where there isn't, and ASKED WHY.....

I'm not allowed to do that??

LOL!!!!


The Co2 FRAUD is so pathetic it has to CENSOR BASIC CLIMATE QUESTIONS to survive....

 

[Dagosa]

You mean, how dare I observe a MAP of the ARCTIC, notice where there is ICE AGE GLACIER and where there isn't, and ASKED WHY.....

I'm not allowed to do that??

LOL!!!!


The Co2 FRAUD is so pathetic it has to CENSOR BASIC CLIMATE QUESTIONS to survive....

Show the map ! Your not allowed to make up questions with no evidence. That’s bullshit.

 

[Dagosa]

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per month. It has cost us over $20 trillion. It has absolutely no truth to it at all, and is easily discredited. But it takes someone in the media to start asking a few questions to shut that down. And none of you apparently have the courage integrity and patriotism necessary to ask them... perhaps because you are all part of the problem and you already know Co2 does absolutely nothing...

CO2 fraud ? You’re smarter than NASA.? Admit it. You have an inferiority complex.

 

[Dagosa]

You mean, how dare I observe a MAP of the ARCTIC, notice where there is ICE AGE GLACIER and where there isn't, and ASKED WHY.....

I'm not allowed to do that??

LOL!!!!


The Co2 FRAUD is so pathetic it has to CENSOR BASIC CLIMATE QUESTIONS to survive....

You’re a fraud because you used a topographical map that uses white to measure higher elevations…..and you claim the white is ice….you can’t even read your own legend.
And you refuse to tell us where it came from.
The words too big ? No link, just typical made up shit.

 

[EMH]

CO2 fraud ? You’re smarter than NASA.? Admit it. You have an inferiority complex.

DATA MATTERS.

What is your evidence that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming??

The DATA?

NOPE!!!

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.




ATMOSPHERIC Co2 went up, ATMOSPHERIC TEMPS did NOT.

THEORY REJECTED per THE ACTUAL DATA which proved Co2 DOES ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

 

[EMH]

You’re a fraud because you used a topographical map that uses white to measure higher elevations…..and you claim the white is ice….you can’t even read your own legend.
And you refuse to tell us where it came from.
The words too big ? No link, just typical made up shit.

Try to refute the following claim

Where is EARTH ice?

90% on LAND MASS ANTARCTICA
7% on LAND MASS GREENLAND
0.3% on LAND MASS ELLESMERE ISLAND



Since you cannot refute that, try to cloud the issue. The issue is WHY there is so much ice on Greenland and 1/1000th that amount on Alaska, and you and Co2 FRAUD

CANNOT AND WILL NOT ANSWER THAT QUESTION

 

[Dagosa]

Try to refute the following claim

Where is EARTH ice?

90% on LAND MASS ANTARCTICA
7% on LAND MASS GREENLAND
0.3% on LAND MASS ELLESMERE ISLAND



Since you cannot refute that, try to cloud the issue. The issue is WHY there is so much ice on Greenland and 1/1000th that amount on Alaska, and you and Co2 FRAUD

CANNOT AND WILL NOT ANSWER THAT QUESTION

Refute it, you can’t prove it..….you throw all these numbers with no reference. You say ice, and you don’t even say what kind

 

[Dagosa]

DATA MATTERS.

What is your evidence that increasing atmospheric Co2 causes warming??

The DATA?

NOPE!!!

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.




ATMOSPHERIC Co2 went up, ATMOSPHERIC TEMPS did NOT.

THEORY REJECTED per THE ACTUAL DATA which proved Co2 DOES ABSOLUTELY NOTHING

Why do you keep posting a reference that disagrees with you ? Are you that ignorant ? Summary of article. It says in plane English, that YOU ar FOS.
….For years, skeptics of global warming have used satellite and weather balloon data to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening.

Now, according to three new studies published in the journal Science, it turns out those conclusions based on satellite and weather balloon data were based on faulty analyses….

 

[Dagosa]

Try to refute the following claim

Where is EARTH ice?

90% on LAND MASS ANTARCTICA
7% on LAND MASS GREENLAND
0.3% on LAND MASS ELLESMERE ISLAND



Since you cannot refute that, try to cloud the issue. The issue is WHY there is so much ice on Greenland and 1/1000th that amount on Alaska, and you and Co2 FRAUD

CANNOT AND WILL NOT ANSWER THAT QUESTION

Already refuted it….illiterate. The map legend said TOPOGRAPHY….what a bozo you are.

 

[EMH]

posting a reference that disagrees with you ?

The "reference" in question documents that, for more than three decades during a period of rising Co2 in the atmosphere, the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps detected precisely NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE in highly correlated fashion.


Hence it documents the undeniable truth that


1. the only evidence of atmospheric "warming" is 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD, not data
2. there is no evidence that adding Co2 to the atmosphere warms the atmosphere, the data completely REFUTED THAT BOGUS NARRATIVE
3. to show "warming" in the atmosphere required a pathetic fudge job that the "warmers" won't even defend

 

[Dagosa]

The "reference" in question documents that, for more than three decades during a period of rising Co2 in the atmosphere, the two and only two measures of atmospheric temps detected precisely NO WARMING IN THE ATMOSPHERE in highly correlated fashion.


Hence it documents the undeniable truth that


1. the only evidence of atmospheric "warming" is 100% pure FUDGED FRAUD, not data
2. there is no evidence that adding Co2 to the atmosphere warms the atmosphere, the data completely REFUTED THAT BOGUS NARRATIVE
3. to show "warming" in the atmosphere required a pathetic fudge job that the "warmers" won't even defend

That’s rediculous. Warming of The atmosphere has never been the primary measure. It’s a secondary convection heating which indirectly occurs…

Temps are taken at near sea level . No wonder you’re so confused and know so little about global warming trends. The radiation is reflected back to earth where it is then released as heat. Maybe you never noticed how rocks and water heat up from the sun‘s radiation even though the atmosphere remains cool….hilarious. You’re in the wrong ball Park.

Atmospheric warming ? Can’t stop laughing….ha ha

 

[EMH]

Warming of The atmosphere has never been the primary measure.

Your side says Co2 is the "cause" of the "warming."

WHERE IS THE Co2???

In the ground?

In the ocean??

LMFAO!!!

 

[Dagosa]

Your side says Co2 is the "cause" of the "warming."

WHERE IS THE Co2???

In the ground?

In the ocean??

LMFAO!!!

I’ve already posted where the CO2 measures are taken and where earth SURFACE temps are taken with a reference from NASA..use Wikipedia. Use anyone of 30 k
research facilities….go ahead, post one if you‘re unable go to their website.
Foolish, it’s call surface temps for a reason. You don’t know Much do you ? You’re whole denial is based upon made up shit….you dint know enough to make any sense at all.

 

[EMH]

I’ve already posted where the CO2 measures are taken and where earth SURFACE temps are taken with a reference from NASA..use Wikipedia. Use anyone of 30 k
research facilities….go ahead, post one if you‘re unable go to their website.
Foolish, it’s call surface temps for a reason. You don’t know Much do you ? You’re whole denial is based upon made up shit….you dint know enough to make any sense at all.

You appear to be admitting that

INCREASING ATMOSPHERIC Co2 does NOT WARM THE ATMOSPHERE

which is actually right, and WHAT THE REAL DATA SAID ALL ALONG...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

 

[Dagosa]

You appear to be admitting that

INCREASING ATMOSPHERIC Co2 does NOT WARM THE ATMOSPHERE

which is actually right, and WHAT THE REAL DATA SAID ALL ALONG...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

where ? Show where you got your fake news data…but you won‘t will you.
I‘m not admitting anything. CO2 doesn’t heat up the atmosphere….It heats the surface…..look up infrared radiation. I’ll wait.

You still don’t have a clue how CO2 in the atmosphere works, do you ? Your comments are totally off base.

 

[Dagosa]

You appear to be admitting that

INCREASING ATMOSPHERIC Co2 does NOT WARM THE ATMOSPHERE

which is actually right, and WHAT THE REAL DATA SAID ALL ALONG...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

You live in the

You appear to be admitting that

INCREASING ATMOSPHERIC Co2 does NOT WARM THE ATMOSPHERE

which is actually right, and WHAT THE REAL DATA SAID ALL ALONG...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

Otherwise you’re just making up shit again.
And no, we don’t live in the troposphere 5-7 miles up.

You appear to be admitting that

INCREASING ATMOSPHERIC Co2 does NOT WARM THE ATMOSPHERE

which is actually right, and WHAT THE REAL DATA SAID ALL ALONG...

Key claim against global warming evaporates

Satellite and weather balloon data used to argue that climate models were wrong and that global warming isn't really happening turns out to be based on faulty analyses, according to three new studies.

www.nbcnews.com

satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.

You keep showing that same reference that says…deniers are wrong…Geesus, can’t you read ?
BTW, we don’t live in troposphere, we live on the surface.
And no, CO2 doesn't heat anything up foolish. You’re hilarious. It reflects infrared rad.