Skylar
Diamond Member
- Jul 5, 2014
- 52,212
- 15,502
- 2,180
This is one - just ONE - simple question about one simple event during Hillary's time as secretary of state, and Liberals - or Hillary - can't answer it. And Liberals think Hillary is going to be able to stand up under the scrutiny that is coming when the GOP finally has it's candidate?!
Youre 'one question' is utterly loaded. For example, 'all other nation' who pulled their diplomatic missions in the city.....consisted of the UK. And the UK had
Steven wasn't 'sent' to Benghazi. He insisted on going. And he knew his security detail and had the warnings about threats. Yet he still insisted on going.
The 'left behind' narrative is horseshit. Benghazi was a mere consulate that Stevens rarely visted. He was based out of Tripoli where the US embassy actually sits. Stevens *chose* to go to Benghazi despite the threats, leaving the comparative safety of the US embassy in Tripoli.
Stevens was aware of the bombing attempts or attacks in Benghazi. He was aware that the UK ambassadors convey had been hit by RPGs, prompting the British to close their Benghazi consulate. And yet Stevens insisted on going anyway.
The only person who 'sent' Stevens to Benghazi....was Stevens.
And worse, you know all of this. But hope we don't.