Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 125,906
- 90,845
- 3,635
No, racist, he could have stayed in his truck.Sooo if he didn’t t have a gun he could have been seriously hurt no?Asked and answered.Where do you see Travis issuing any force at all before he was attacked? You keep conflating that getting out of the truck with a shotgun is a crime it is not they were following a criminal, The neighborhood was on high alert for this break in artist was followed and were on the phone with the cops.. sorry he felt threat he’d stop breakingNo one made Travis get out of his vehicle. No one made him do so with a shot gun. He can't resort to lethal force to stop someone he's so afraid of, he needs a shotgun; when he simply could have just driven away.A shotgun can only be brandished, there is no holster for it lol he didn’t get him to stop, Arbery attacked him because he no where to run he heard him on the phone with the cops, no where he would go.Doesn't matter what his excuse is, it's illegal to brandish his weapon to get Arbery to stop. If McMichael was in fear for his own safety, he should not have gotten out of the truck.How did he use his gun to stop him? The gun was for protection, hey serial robber who previously was witnessed with his hands down his pants like he had a gun? You can’t infringe in my rights because your token got shotIt was illegal to use his gun to get Arbery to stop.Where did you see somebody illegally trying to be detained I see a man on the back of a truck on his phone with the cops telling him to stop, lol I see another man in front of the truck saying stop that was attacked almost had his gun stolen, And he defended himself with the hero that he is good men with guns will always winNope. Travis McMichael committed a felony in the way he used his gun. Arbery was defending himself from that felony. Georgia law says Travis McMicharl is not allowed to use lethal force to defend himself since he himself committed a felony in trying to illegally detain Arbery.The shooting was justifiable because Aubrey tried to take the man’s gun he rushed him he attacked him he came across the car at full speedYou have no evidence he intended to. Furthermore, the Supreme Court has ruled lethal force is not justifiable in cases involving stopping someone for stealing property; so even had Arbery stolen something, Travis McMichael still could not use a gun to force Arbery to stop.LOLOLThey act like this hammer was just in the midddle of the street following someone suspected of stealing tools lol View attachment 337212View attachment 337213I said they followed a serial break in artist, and they were attacked . End of story he turned out to be a felon, and the hammer I think will be proven to be one of the Construction workers That left it there.. I don’t understand why you’re defending this guyImbecile, you claim he stole from the unfinished house. Had he done so, he would have committed a felony. Only there's no proof that he did.No I said he’s a felon, he is, he brought a gun to school to shoot it up. But thankfully he was averted..What lie?? You falsely claimed Arbery committed s felony in that unfinished house. There's zero so far he committed a felony.What lie? Is it against the law to follow a serial breaking artist? Yes or noThere was no felony committed.Again have all the interviews been released yet? NO, but what we can gather from what we know and still pictures, a black man that looks like AA kept coming back to a dwelling, and I haven’t heard a word from any one that owned the equipment ( the construction workers) neighborhoods had tools stolen; and the neighborhood was in high alert, and formed a community policing, they had enough! TimeNone of those neighbors ever saw him steal anything and putting your hand in your pocket is not a felony.Neighbors had tools stolen and he was seen with his hands down his pants like he had a gun, he’s a felonNot a felony.Serial breaking artist, aren’t you listing to the neighbors?LOLOLOwner of Home that Arbery Entered Says the Neighborhood Was on “High Alert” Burglary of Neighbor and Reports of TrespassingLOLLol great story hahah. I see two hero’s following a suspect, first hand knowledge, asking him to stop while on the phone with the cops, and the shooting was justified because he grabbed his gun when he didn’t have to, he attacked when he didn’t have to, there was no attempt to subdue him the police officer remained in the back of the truck if they were going to stop him you would think both men would be out of the truck to tackle him.. they didn’t all they said was stop the police are coming stop the police are coming stop the police are comingYour dementia is getting worse. I said nothing about race. And there’s nothing any neighbor can say that can alter the video which shows three neighbors in 2 vehicles sandwiched Arbery onto a deadly conflict with an armed vigilante.I think after all the neighbors are interviewed and construction workers, in the full five minute video was released, you will look like a racist fool"He almost certainly took the fishing equipment."There was no robber. Repeatedly claiming there was a robber will never make it so. Want proof you're lying about him being a robber...? You can't say what he robbed. You can't show him on video robbing anything.LOLOLThanks, no they haven’t. I’m sure they might have a different story then the property owner. It’s was the workers tools. Can’t wait for all the evidence to be released heheGoogle is your friend.Have the construction workers been interviewed yet?
So your defense of these murderers rests upon an imaginary hammer and non-existent evidence.
They are sooo fucked.
You are going to be so fucked when Americans realize that having delusional people who see race everywhere is simply not worth it to have around.
The case has been now repeated ad infinum. Robber tried assaulting a person who was there to detain him, and that's that. Again, someone who defends criminals is not worth having around.
If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie.
He almost certainly took the fishing equipment.
He was a classic street criminal, who you are defending. That's because you are a moron.
... of which, you have no proof. All you're doing is making shit up and then casting dispersions based upon your own made up nonsense.
If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie.
Of what did they have "first hand knowledge?" All they saw was Arbery running. And what cop was in the truck? There were no cops in the truck.
If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie.
they saw him running from the crime scene
There was no crime scene, ya moron. Nothing was taken.
With every post, you prove over and over how mentally retarded you are.
To follow the felon
If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie.
If truth and reality were on your side, you wouldn't have to lie.
But like I said English his neighbor Perez had tools stolen from his truck he told English if you get an alert please let me know! Their property was connected. Their neighborhood was looking out for each other all they wanted to do was follow the guy that Travis confronted previously that would not stop breaking into peoples cars and houses. And the hero’s were attacked
Don't run away from your bullshit-- embrace it.
Leftists always defend criminals because like attracts like.
It wouldn't be surprising if he stole whatever he could get.
Tell me again how you're not accusing Arbery of committing a felony in that unfinished house.
Oh, and how did Arbery drop a hammer there when:
a) there was no hammer there
b) he's not seen throwing anything
c) that stick on the ground is there before Arbery was
He committed a burglary even if he didn't take anything. He very much intended to.
They had reasonable suspicion and therefore every right to chase him down.
And even had Travus not pointed the gun at Arbery, it was still illegal to brandish a firearm intended to get Arbery to stop. I found this, where Georgia was seeking to make such brandishing legal -- meaning it's not legal to do what Travis did...
Georgia panel approves bill aiming to make it legal to brandish a gun
A Georgia Senate panel approved legislation late Monday that would make it legal for a gun owner to pull or show their firearm during a dispute as long as he or she doesn’t “aim it offensively” at someone.www.ajc.com
Bill would legalize brandishing a gun in Georgia
ATLANTA — Some Georgia lawmakers are working hard to make it legal for people to brandish a gun.www.meadvilletribune.comATLANTA — Some Georgia lawmakers are working hard to make it legal for people to brandish a gun.Sen. Tyler Harper, R-Ocilla, introduced the legislation that would make it legal for gun owners to show their firearms during an argument as long as they don’t “aim it offensively” at another person.The bill passed the Senate Judiciary Committee in a 5-3 party-line vote in a committee meeting that went late into the evening Monday.Harper said the purpose of the legislation is to “decriminalize” displaying a firearm and allow firearms to be brandished when attempting to deescalate a situation.Currently in Georgia, gun owners can be charged with felony aggravated assault and face up to 20 years in prison if they draw their firearm during a dispute.“The crime that you could be charged for displaying your weapon can be treated just the same as if you actually shot someone,” Harper said.If a person displays or pulls a gun on another person “in a threatening manner,” they could be charged with felony aggravated assault.
wait stay in your car if your afraid?? Lol WHAT? No how about you don’t attack me
In to houses.. dismissed