Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
even if that was true Obama would have accomplished something that West would never be able to do.
Increasing the national debt by $4 trillion?
Yeah, I see your point.
Obama?
Yep!
even if that was true Obama would have accomplished something that West would never be able to do.
What did he accomplish?
Oh yeah....
In chronological order:
(paraphrased)
'this is the worst economy since the great depression., The end is near. You will all find it hard to support your families'
and then.....
'vote for me and 95% of you will get a check in the mail from yours truly at a time when you most need it'
Yeah...he accomplished a lot. He bought himself an election.
So you are unaware of her involvement in releasing private information about his wife...or staging a protest in front of his campaign headquarters.
These are things she did not deny.......her attitude was "all is fair in politics"....
And she did stage and lead a protest outside of his campaign headquarters when he was running for Congress accusing him of vile attitudes toward women because he had written a piece for "Bikers Magazine" that is not exactly PC when it comes to women. His article was not un-PC and he has never received a bad rap re attitudes toward women, but it was guilt by association and some very unwarranted accusations on her part.
I hope the more reasonable among us are beginning to put this in its larger context. I still will not condone the language he used, but it was not sexist, she is not a victim, and he was plenty justified at being ticked off.
Like I said earlier....
She is intelligent, articulate and passionate. I do not question her intelligence.
But she knowingly spins the truth about her adversaries.....does what she can to ruin their reputations for political gain....in a way, she does what we expect of The National Enquirer....but you see...she is a congressperson...she gets free air time and such air time is to communicate truth to her constituants.,......but she uses it to blast her opponents....to spin the truth....to ruin the names of those that she disagrees with.
To me, that is childish, borderline vile behavior.
Your saying that is not what I am referring to. You have all the right in the world to believe what you believe and I respect anyones sentiments...whether I agree with them or not.
What I find interesting, however, is what you used to support that belief.
You stated "ehat she said" and then stated "his response".
But you see...his response was not strictly to those words....and I would think you would already know that.
Yet your post implied that it WAS strictly to those words.
That is spin to support your sentiments...
Which means, to me, that you are not overly secure with your sentiments.
Those were the nastist bits. I assume most people have read or listen to what is being broadcast. I find it amusing that whoever it was I was responding to called her a pile of shit is all. There was nothing in what I've seen or heard from her speech in Congress that show she deserved to be called vile or dispicable.
So you are unaware of her involvement in releasing private information about his wife...or staging a protest in front of his campaign headquarters.
These are things she did not deny.......her attitude was "all is fair in politics"....
even if that was true Obama would have accomplished something that West would never be able to do.
What did he accomplish?
Oh yeah....
In chronological order:
(paraphrased)
'this is the worst economy since the great depression., The end is near. You will all find it hard to support your families'
and then.....
'vote for me and 95% of you will get a check in the mail from yours truly at a time when you most need it'
Yeah...he accomplished a lot. He bought himself an election.
What has West accomplished for you to slide on his pole like he's God? What about the Teabaggers?
So you are unaware of her involvement in releasing private information about his wife...or staging a protest in front of his campaign headquarters.
These are things she did not deny.......her attitude was "all is fair in politics"....
And she did stage and lead a protest outside of his campaign headquarters when he was running for Congress accusing him of vile attitudes toward women because he had written a piece for "Bikers Magazine" that is not exactly PC when it comes to women. His article was not un-PC and he has never received a bad rap re attitudes toward women, but it was guilt by association and some very unwarranted accusations on her part.
I hope the more reasonable among us are beginning to put this in its larger context. I still will not condone the language he used, but it was not sexist, she is not a victim, and he was plenty justified at being ticked off.
Like I said earlier....
She is intelligent, articulate and passionate. I do not question her intelligence.
But she knowingly spins the truth about her adversaries.....does what she can to ruin their reputations for political gain....in a way, she does what we expect of The National Enquirer....but you see...she is a congressperson...she gets free air time and such air time is to communicate truth to her constituants.,......but she uses it to blast her opponents....to spin the truth....to ruin the names of those that she disagrees with.
To me, that is childish, borderline vile behavior.
Those were the nastist bits. I assume most people have read or listen to what is being broadcast. I find it amusing that whoever it was I was responding to called her a pile of shit is all. There was nothing in what I've seen or heard from her speech in Congress that show she deserved to be called vile or dispicable.
So you are unaware of her involvement in releasing private information about his wife...or staging a protest in front of his campaign headquarters.
These are things she did not deny.......her attitude was "all is fair in politics"....
Unaware also means your lying to us. Have a link to your tripe? Didn't think so.
DEERFIELD BEACH, Fla. -- Allen West would rather be talking about his military service or his ideas to revive the economy. But instead the Republican running for U.S. Congress is reeling from a Florida Democratic Party mailing that released his Social Security number and his wife’s federal employee number.
Read more: Democrats Release Republican's Social Security Number - Politics News Story - WPBF West Palm Beach
Those were the nastist bits. I assume most people have read or listen to what is being broadcast. I find it amusing that whoever it was I was responding to called her a pile of shit is all. There was nothing in what I've seen or heard from her speech in Congress that show she deserved to be called vile or dispicable.
So you are unaware of her involvement in releasing private information about his wife...or staging a protest in front of his campaign headquarters.
These are things she did not deny.......her attitude was "all is fair in politics"....
Unaware also means your lying to us. Have a link to your tripe? Didn't think so.
What did he accomplish?
Oh yeah....
In chronological order:
(paraphrased)
'this is the worst economy since the great depression., The end is near. You will all find it hard to support your families'
and then.....
'vote for me and 95% of you will get a check in the mail from yours truly at a time when you most need it'
Yeah...he accomplished a lot. He bought himself an election.
What has West accomplished for you to slide on his pole like he's God? What about the Teabaggers?
I am not "sliding on his pole" whatsoever. I am not one of his constituants and I most certqainly had no say in his getting elected.
However, I am on here defending him as a congressperson who may have overstepped his boundaries a bit but his anger was well warranted...and Shultz is by no means some innocent victim here. To the contrary, she was the agressor over the last several years...she has spun his sentiments and intentions...she has compromised his reputation with pure spin....she has acted like a child....
And before you jump down my throat....I have been known on here to say the same thing about how Rangel was treated....he was the victim of a witch hunt.....and I made it clear about my sentiments about Boehner...He loves to spin the intentions of his colleagues on the left and thus he is not fit to be speaker of the house...
I DO NOT like spin. I dont watch Hannity becuase he spins. I did not appreciate Pelosi becuase she spins...Harry Reid spins....
I do not like spin and I will always defend the victims of spin.
And she did stage and lead a protest outside of his campaign headquarters when he was running for Congress accusing him of vile attitudes toward women because he had written a piece for "Bikers Magazine" that is not exactly PC when it comes to women. His article was not un-PC and he has never received a bad rap re attitudes toward women, but it was guilt by association and some very unwarranted accusations on her part.
I hope the more reasonable among us are beginning to put this in its larger context. I still will not condone the language he used, but it was not sexist, she is not a victim, and he was plenty justified at being ticked off.
Like I said earlier....
She is intelligent, articulate and passionate. I do not question her intelligence.
But she knowingly spins the truth about her adversaries.....does what she can to ruin their reputations for political gain....in a way, she does what we expect of The National Enquirer....but you see...she is a congressperson...she gets free air time and such air time is to communicate truth to her constituants.,......but she uses it to blast her opponents....to spin the truth....to ruin the names of those that she disagrees with.
To me, that is childish, borderline vile behavior.
Except, she didn't spin anything. The stupid bill West voted on would have ended medicare, etc., as we know it.
West knows that and he knows it makes him look bad since many of his constituents are elderly.
That's why he blew up like a little toad.
What has West accomplished for you to slide on his pole like he's God? What about the Teabaggers?
I am not "sliding on his pole" whatsoever. I am not one of his constituants and I most certqainly had no say in his getting elected.
However, I am on here defending him as a congressperson who may have overstepped his boundaries a bit but his anger was well warranted...and Shultz is by no means some innocent victim here. To the contrary, she was the agressor over the last several years...she has spun his sentiments and intentions...she has compromised his reputation with pure spin....she has acted like a child....
And before you jump down my throat....I have been known on here to say the same thing about how Rangel was treated....he was the victim of a witch hunt.....and I made it clear about my sentiments about Boehner...He loves to spin the intentions of his colleagues on the left and thus he is not fit to be speaker of the house...
I DO NOT like spin. I dont watch Hannity becuase he spins. I did not appreciate Pelosi becuase she spins...Harry Reid spins....
I do not like spin and I will always defend the victims of spin.
West simply got what he dished out on a daily basis, don't give me that BS, here#s West blasting Obama with retarded rhetoric:
Freedom's Lighthouse » GOP Rep. Allen West Blasts Obamas Class-Warfare, Marxist-Demagogic Rhetoric Video 4/21/11
Typical Teabagger rhetoric, what he received from Wasserman was way more tame and he wants to pound his chest talking about say it to his face? If you can't take it don't dish out and before you call someone else disgusting and vile check your own rhetoric first.
So you are unaware of her involvement in releasing private information about his wife...or staging a protest in front of his campaign headquarters.
These are things she did not deny.......her attitude was "all is fair in politics"....
Unaware also means your lying to us. Have a link to your tripe? Didn't think so.
You are naive to politics in his district.
Not my problem.
Like I said earlier....
She is intelligent, articulate and passionate. I do not question her intelligence.
But she knowingly spins the truth about her adversaries.....does what she can to ruin their reputations for political gain....in a way, she does what we expect of The National Enquirer....but you see...she is a congressperson...she gets free air time and such air time is to communicate truth to her constituants.,......but she uses it to blast her opponents....to spin the truth....to ruin the names of those that she disagrees with.
To me, that is childish, borderline vile behavior.
Except, she didn't spin anything. The stupid bill West voted on would have ended medicare, etc., as we know it.
West knows that and he knows it makes him look bad since many of his constituents are elderly.
That's why he blew up like a little toad.
The fact that she is claiming that what she said on the floor was the reason he blew up at her was the spin in itself. She knows dam well that enough was enough for him.
Perhaps the bill he voted on was not best for his constituants in the short term, but he deemed it best for them in the long term.
If her words made him look bad, then he most certainly already knew that his voting for the bill made him look bad...so her words had nothing to do with him blowing up.
I suggest you get off your partisan horse. It makes you loook......partisan.
Nothing she has said or done should have made him blow up like the idiot he is....the guy has a temper problem and this isn't the first time it's been obvious.
Unaware also means your lying to us. Have a link to your tripe? Didn't think so.
You are naive to politics in his district.
Not my problem.
She wasn't involved in releasing private information about his wife.
I am not "sliding on his pole" whatsoever. I am not one of his constituants and I most certqainly had no say in his getting elected.
However, I am on here defending him as a congressperson who may have overstepped his boundaries a bit but his anger was well warranted...and Shultz is by no means some innocent victim here. To the contrary, she was the agressor over the last several years...she has spun his sentiments and intentions...she has compromised his reputation with pure spin....she has acted like a child....
And before you jump down my throat....I have been known on here to say the same thing about how Rangel was treated....he was the victim of a witch hunt.....and I made it clear about my sentiments about Boehner...He loves to spin the intentions of his colleagues on the left and thus he is not fit to be speaker of the house...
I DO NOT like spin. I dont watch Hannity becuase he spins. I did not appreciate Pelosi becuase she spins...Harry Reid spins....
I do not like spin and I will always defend the victims of spin.
West simply got what he dished out on a daily basis, don't give me that BS, here#s West blasting Obama with retarded rhetoric:
Freedom's Lighthouse » GOP Rep. Allen West Blasts Obamas Class-Warfare, Marxist-Demagogic Rhetoric Video 4/21/11
Typical Teabagger rhetoric, what he received from Wasserman was way more tame and he wants to pound his chest talking about say it to his face? If you can't take it don't dish out and before you call someone else disgusting and vile check your own rhetoric first.
First I saw of that.
Like I said...he is not in my congressperson so I do not follow him much.
Yeah...that was pretty cheesy of him...immature...childish.
Jeez...I say we get rid of all of them and start over. They are all a bunch of underworked over paid party line jerks...and they turn to us to fight their battles.
Except, she didn't spin anything. The stupid bill West voted on would have ended medicare, etc., as we know it.
West knows that and he knows it makes him look bad since many of his constituents are elderly.
That's why he blew up like a little toad.
The fact that she is claiming that what she said on the floor was the reason he blew up at her was the spin in itself. She knows dam well that enough was enough for him.
Perhaps the bill he voted on was not best for his constituants in the short term, but he deemed it best for them in the long term.
If her words made him look bad, then he most certainly already knew that his voting for the bill made him look bad...so her words had nothing to do with him blowing up.
I suggest you get off your partisan horse. It makes you loook......partisan.
You don't even know what you're talking about.You are naive to politics in his district.
Not my problem.
She wasn't involved in releasing private information about his wife.
yeah...I know...it was an innocent mistake.
A democrat NEVER does the wrong thing.
So you are unaware of her involvement in releasing private information about his wife...or staging a protest in front of his campaign headquarters.
These are things she did not deny.......her attitude was "all is fair in politics"....
Unaware also means your lying to us. Have a link to your tripe? Didn't think so.
You are naive to politics in his district.
Not my problem.
You don't even know what you're talking about.She wasn't involved in releasing private information about his wife.
yeah...I know...it was an innocent mistake.
A democrat NEVER does the wrong thing.
Bodecea already challenged him to produce proof, and he cannot.
He's also committing slander but I guess that doesn't matter to him.You don't even know what you're talking about.yeah...I know...it was an innocent mistake.
A democrat NEVER does the wrong thing.
He doesn't either, because he is lying to us.
