Bill to Improve Education in America: Rand Paul Introduces S.4979

[Natural Citizen]

Short and sweet. One sentence bill...

“The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2022.”

S.4979 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): A bill to terminate the Department of Education.

Summary of S.4979 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): A bill to terminate the Department of Education.

www.congress.gov

That is all.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Good Morning, btw.

 

[MisterBeale]

Rand for president, 2024.

 

[Natural Citizen]

Idiot

Tell us about it...

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Short and sweet. One sentence bill...

“The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2022.”

S.4979 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): A bill to terminate the Department of Education.

Summary of S.4979 - 116th Congress (2019-2020): A bill to terminate the Department of Education.

www.congress.gov

That is all.

 

[Jimmy_Chitwood]

Idiot

Is a pussy hat better?

 

[AFrench2]

Using the US Senate to troll. Wow, how droll.

 

[meaner gene]

Short and sweet. One sentence bill...

“The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2022.”

That is all.

You know that the Department of Ed if funded by fiscal year, about $68 billion in the CR. That would leave $50 billion in limbo. And a cabinet officer with nothing to do and $50 billion to do it with.

 

[TNHarley]

They have no business, or AUTHORITY, to be involved in schools anyway.

 

[MisterBeale]

I like Rand, good critical thinker, he should be on TEE VEE telling the truth.

 

[MisterBeale]

Short and sweet. One sentence bill...

“The Department of Education shall terminate on December 31, 2022.”

That is all.

You know that the Department of Ed if funded by fiscal year, about $68 billion in the CR. That would leave $50 billion in limbo. And a cabinet officer with nothing to do and $50 billion to do it with.

Ever since they created the Dept. of Ed, college tuition has gone out of control.

You know, if they got rid of the Department of Ed, there would be no need to fund it at all, and there would be NO cabinet officer to begin with.

 

[meaner gene]

They have no business, or AUTHORITY, to be involved in schools anyway.

Congress certainly has the authority,

Commerce Clause | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information ...

 

[TNHarley]

They have no business, or AUTHORITY, to be involved in schools anyway.

Congress certainly has the authority,
Commerce Clause | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information ...

Lol
Yea, i totally see where they have the authority to regulate and fund public schools.
I feel so ENLIGHTENED!

 

[meaner gene]

You know that the Department of Ed if funded by fiscal year, about $68 billion in the CR. That would leave $50 billion in limbo. And a cabinet officer with nothing to do and $50 billion to do it with.

You know, if they got rid of the Department of Ed, there would be no need to fund it at all, and there would be NO cabinet officer to begin with.

The Rand Paul legislation does nothing to address any of those points, so the funding would continue, and the sec of ed would continue.

As the dept of ed has been funded by CR (continuing resolution) it means it's funding can't be cut without 60 votes in the senate.

 

[meaner gene]

Lol
Yea, i totally see where they have the authority to regulate and fund public schools.
I feel so ENLIGHTENED!

You can start with
Wickard v. Filburn :: 317 U.S. 111 (1942)

 

[rightwinger]

Can’t believe what a Douchebag Rand Paul is turning into

 

[TNHarley]

Lol
Yea, i totally see where they have the authority to regulate and fund public schools.
I feel so ENLIGHTENED!

You can start with
Wickard v. Filburn :: 317 U.S. 111 (1942)

Thanks for making me read another irrelevant post.

 

[TNHarley]

Can’t believe what a Douchebag Rand Paul is turning into

That Pesky Constitution | FreedomWorks
"that pesky constitution"

 

[rightwinger]

Can’t believe what a Douchebag Rand Paul is turning into

That Pesky Constitution | FreedomWorks
"that pesky constitution"

?

 

[meaner gene]

You can start with
Wickard v. Filburn :: 317 U.S. 111 (1942)

Thanks for making me read another irrelevant post.

You questioned congresses authority for the Department of Education.

I answered.

You could at least thank me for educating you. (about education) And I don't even have a constitutional mandate to do so.