Birthright Citizenship…Arguments to begin this week at the Supreme Court.

[BrokeLoser]

SUPREME COURT TO FINALLY HEAR ARGUMENTS ON THE ANCHOR BABY SCOURGE​

If SCOTUS rules for good real core Americans should we be ready for cities to burn down? What if the ruling is retroactive? What if we have to send home all with an illegal lineage? How will people prove their legal lineage?

Supreme Court to Finally Hear Arguments on the Anchor Baby Scourge - League of Power

After decades of deliberate ethnic cleansing against the American people, the US Supreme Court will finally hear arguments this week about our nation’s insane “anchor baby” policy. The Democrats’ ethnic cleansing lawfare teams are trying to stop President Donald Trump’s executive order to end...

www.lopmatrix.com

 

[Scoutster]

Although I’m not a supporter of anchor babies, I do not see the court overruling the 14th as it stands. Congress and a president needs to amend the constitution. No, I don’t believe you should automatically be given birth right citizenship if neither one of your parents are American citizens.

 

[Independent thinker]

SUPREME COURT TO FINALLY HEAR ARGUMENTS ON THE ANCHOR BABY SCOURGE​

If SCOTUS rules for good real core Americans should we be ready for cities to burn down? What if the ruling is retroactive? What if we have to send home all with an illegal lineage? How will people prove their legal lineage?

Supreme Court to Finally Hear Arguments on the Anchor Baby Scourge - League of Power

After decades of deliberate ethnic cleansing against the American people, the US Supreme Court will finally hear arguments this week about our nation’s insane “anchor baby” policy. The Democrats’ ethnic cleansing lawfare teams are trying to stop President Donald Trump’s executive order to end...

www.lopmatrix.com

I hope this works out. To continue allowing people to come here illegally, have babies, and then they all get to stay and have the government take care of them is insane.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Although I’m not a supporter of anchor babies, I do not see the court overruling the 14th as it stands. Congress and a president needs to amend the constitution. No, I don’t believe you should automatically be given birth right citizenship if neither one of your parents are American citizens.

It all lies in the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” and in Framer intent.
How will this Trump SCOTUS translate the phrase and what will they think the Framers intent was.

 

[Delldude]

Although I’m not a supporter of anchor babies, I do not see the court overruling the 14th as it stands. Congress and a president needs to amend the constitution. No, I don’t believe you should automatically be given birth right citizenship if neither one of your parents are American citizens.

No amendment needed. Just an interpretation.

 

[theHawk]

SUPREME COURT TO FINALLY HEAR ARGUMENTS ON THE ANCHOR BABY SCOURGE​

If SCOTUS rules for good real core Americans should we be ready for cities to burn down? What if the ruling is retroactive? What if we have to send home all with an illegal lineage? How will people prove their legal lineage?

Supreme Court to Finally Hear Arguments on the Anchor Baby Scourge - League of Power

After decades of deliberate ethnic cleansing against the American people, the US Supreme Court will finally hear arguments this week about our nation’s insane “anchor baby” policy. The Democrats’ ethnic cleansing lawfare teams are trying to stop President Donald Trump’s executive order to end...

www.lopmatrix.com

Roberts will cuck out as usual. Amy Commie Barret of course will too.

 

[Foxfyre]

No amendment needed. Just an interpretation.

Agreed. We need interpretation based on original intent.

 

[MisterBeale]

The globalist deep state is hypocritical, and intelligent Americans know this.

 

[TNHarley]

the Framers intent was.

This is obviously the most important. And the debates about this amendment are well documented. "anchor babies" is NOT what they meant.

 

[WEATHER53]

If the method and vehicle of your birth here is illegal then I can’t imagine how thinkers would construe that you are magically fully good for US citizenship, I think it’s a litmus for who in USSC is governed by facts vs feelings

 

[WEATHER53]

It all lies in the phrase “subject to the jurisdiction thereof” and in Framer intent.
How will this Trump SCOTUS translate the phrase and what will they think the Framers intent was.

Remember the framers had no earthly inkling of the idea of illegsls walking in here at time of writing. Since it was not addressed then it’s not endorsed

 

[ThisIsMe]

SUPREME COURT TO FINALLY HEAR ARGUMENTS ON THE ANCHOR BABY SCOURGE​

If SCOTUS rules for good real core Americans should we be ready for cities to burn down? What if the ruling is retroactive? What if we have to send home all with an illegal lineage? How will people prove their legal lineage?

Supreme Court to Finally Hear Arguments on the Anchor Baby Scourge - League of Power

After decades of deliberate ethnic cleansing against the American people, the US Supreme Court will finally hear arguments this week about our nation’s insane “anchor baby” policy. The Democrats’ ethnic cleansing lawfare teams are trying to stop President Donald Trump’s executive order to end...

www.lopmatrix.com

I doubt they will overturn it. The implications would be profound. Just a bunch, but I think they will all rule against this.

 

[22lcidw]

The Supreme Court can say that no one is entitled to any government help in any way though. Nothing. Sounds harsh. Survival of a nation is somewhat perilous. People really do not want to pay for others and they will not tolerate the inflation as a tax on us all.

 

[Rawley]

Although I’m not a supporter of anchor babies, I do not see the court overruling the 14th as it stands.

Why not?

 

[Unkotare]

I hope this works out. To continue allowing people to come here illegally, have babies, and then they all get to stay ....

They don't. Just the US citizen, unless the deported family chooses to take him with them.

 

[Rawley]

I doubt they will overturn it. The implications would be profound.

How? Fewer illegals coming across to the border to have babies? How is that "profound?"

 

[Unkotare]

This is obviously the most important. And the debates about this amendment are well documented. "anchor babies" is NOT what they meant.

"Anchor babies" don't, of course, exist.

 

[80zephyr]

Although I’m not a supporter of anchor babies, I do not see the court overruling the 14th as it stands. Congress and a president needs to amend the constitution. No, I don’t believe you should automatically be given birth right citizenship if neither one of your parents are American citizens.

"On every question of construction carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text or invented against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed." --Thomas Jefferson

 

[80zephyr]

"Anchor babies" don't, of course, exist.

Just How Does an Anchor Baby Anchor the Illegal Alien Parent?

A reader asked: "Just what is the mechanism that allows an anchor baby to keep his or her illegal alien parents in the U.S.?"There are four different mechanisms at work here, as my CIS colleague, Jon Feere, and I see it:

cis.org

 

[Zincwarrior]

I thought they heard arguments back on May 15?