CDC Acknowledges Heart Risks To Young People, Aflds Says Must Discontinue Covid-19 Vaccination In People ≤ 30

I usually just use Google. However, sometimes I do notice that I get different results depending on search terms.
Google has engineered the narrative for you. They have decided what you need to see, and what you should not see.
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
 
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
We each have our own bias, as does each source of information. If we subjectively research or vet a news story or topic, we search via sources that confirm our bias. If we objectively research a news story or topic, then we search all sources, regardless of the bias of the source, for the actual truth. In order to objectively search for the actual truth, we must isolate ourselves from our own bias.
 
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
We each have our own bias, as does each source of information. If we subjectively research or vet a news story or topic, we search via sources that confirm our bias. If we objectively research a news story or topic, then we search all sources, regardless of the bias of the source, for the actual truth. In order to objectively search for the actual truth, we must isolate ourselves from our own bias.
I usually just resort to the fewest fallacies.
 
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
We each have our own bias, as does each source of information. If we subjectively research or vet a news story or topic, we search via sources that confirm our bias. If we objectively research a news story or topic, then we search all sources, regardless of the bias of the source, for the actual truth. In order to objectively search for the actual truth, we must isolate ourselves from our own bias.
I usually just resort to the fewest fallacies.
If one's perception of what fallacy is is based solely upon what the MSM and google engineers and feeds lefties, then one's perception is owned and engineered by the MSM and Google.
 
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
We each have our own bias, as does each source of information. If we subjectively research or vet a news story or topic, we search via sources that confirm our bias. If we objectively research a news story or topic, then we search all sources, regardless of the bias of the source, for the actual truth. In order to objectively search for the actual truth, we must isolate ourselves from our own bias.
I usually just resort to the fewest fallacies.
If one's perception of what fallacy is is based solely upon what the MSM and google engineers and feeds lefties, then one's perception is owned and engineered by the MSM and Google.
If the "gospel Truth" is based solely upon right wing perception of any unsound reasoning, then right wingers are even less well informed.
 
americasfrontlinedoctors.org ^ | 6/15/2021

LOS ANGELES, CA – America’s Frontline Doctors released the following statement today in response to the announcement by the Centers for Disease Control that they will hold a June 18th emergency meeting of The Advisory Committee on Immunization Practice (ACIP) to address increased rates of inflammation of the heart muscle and heart lining after COVID-19 vaccination, particularly in young people. In a June 10th meeting the CDC disclosed, as of May 31, 475 cases of myocarditis/pericarditis were reported to VAERS of Americans age 30 and younger. The conditions called myocarditis and pericarditis can cause permanent heart damage. AFLDS is currently suing the Dept. of Health and Human Services to prevent additional emergency use authorizations of COVID-19 vaccines.

“It’s long past time that the CDC acknowledged there are hundreds of cases involving young people who have been vaccinated. Almost all of these children require hospitalization and 20% have reduced heart function. The children/youths will need to be on heart failure drugs and no physical activity for 3-6 months to try to prevent permanent heart failure. The CDC must immediately suspend any additional authorizations for the use of COVID-19 vaccines in children. If an otherwise healthy 12-year-old suffers heart damage after receiving these vaccines, their life will never be the same. These conditions can change a young person’s healthy heart to that of a frail 70 year old overnight. It continues to be unfortunate that the CDC refuses to acknowledge risks and mounting adverse events until they are forced to by rising cases.

“Pediatric Medical Director for America’s Frontline Doctors, Dr Angie Farella submitted a letter to CDC for review on this very issue. She wrote, “Vaccines take years to safely test. It’s not only the number of people tested but the length of time that is important when creating new vaccines. These experimental agents must not be rushed and licensed early, before the completion of all trials.”

“The risk to children from COVID-19 is statistically insignificant, yet the nation’s medical bureaucracy and Big Pharma continue to put our children at risk to push an experimental agent that is not medically necessary. Parents, physicians and elected officials must stand up for our nation’s children now before we find more damage has been done at the hands of politicized science.”

--------------------

Meanwhile...
WHOA! Did Andrew Cuomo Just Use Real Science to Demolish Their Whole Vaccine Narrative?

On the bright side, some lucky young folks will not be allowed to go to university, for lack of vaccine passport, and will thereby avoid getting brainwashed.
Not arguing one way or the other... but I read the report straight from the CDC, and I am not seeing these kinds of numbers. As well as I don't see anywhere where the CDC is reviewing administration to young adults.
And who is American Front Line Doctors?
 
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
We each have our own bias, as does each source of information. If we subjectively research or vet a news story or topic, we search via sources that confirm our bias. If we objectively research a news story or topic, then we search all sources, regardless of the bias of the source, for the actual truth. In order to objectively search for the actual truth, we must isolate ourselves from our own bias.
I usually just resort to the fewest fallacies.
If one's perception of what fallacy is is based solely upon what the MSM and google engineers and feeds lefties, then one's perception is owned and engineered by the MSM and Google.
If the "gospel Truth" is based solely upon right wing perception of any unsound reasoning, then right wingers are even less well informed.
You are starting to see the way, but we need resent and distrust BOTH kinds of media sources. If you trust either type of biased media, they will own you and your perception of the political landscape. Subjective research is research that is done to prove your belief or perception, objective research is only looking for the truth.

Lefties have a very difficult time isolating themselves from their own bias, since lefty biased news and propaganda sources are overwhelming and forced upon society.
 
And who is American Front Line Doctors?
Well credentialed doctors. Lefties love saying that they trust what doctors have to say about covid culture topics, but only if the doctors stick to the political covid narrative. AFLD do not worry about complying with the political narrative.
 
And who is American Front Line Doctors?
Well credentialed doctors. Lefties love saying that they trust what doctors have to say about covid culture topics, but only if the doctors stick to the political covid narrative. AFLD do not worry about complying with the political narrative.
Nevertheless... what I read straight from the same CDC release they mention... I am not seeing what they say the release says.
 
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
We each have our own bias, as does each source of information. If we subjectively research or vet a news story or topic, we search via sources that confirm our bias. If we objectively research a news story or topic, then we search all sources, regardless of the bias of the source, for the actual truth. In order to objectively search for the actual truth, we must isolate ourselves from our own bias.
I usually just resort to the fewest fallacies.
If one's perception of what fallacy is is based solely upon what the MSM and google engineers and feeds lefties, then one's perception is owned and engineered by the MSM and Google.
If the "gospel Truth" is based solely upon right wing perception of any unsound reasoning, then right wingers are even less well informed.
You are starting to see the way, but we need resent and distrust BOTH kinds of media sources. If you trust either type of biased media, they will own you and your perception of the political landscape. Subjective research is research that is done to prove your belief or perception, objective research is only looking for the truth.

Lefties have a very difficult time isolating themselves from their own bias, since lefty biased news and propaganda sources are overwhelming and forced upon society.
I demur. Right-Wingers resort to mostly nothing but Bigotry not any valid arguments or sound reasoning. Anyone can read it for themselves here in the public domain.
 
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
We each have our own bias, as does each source of information. If we subjectively research or vet a news story or topic, we search via sources that confirm our bias. If we objectively research a news story or topic, then we search all sources, regardless of the bias of the source, for the actual truth. In order to objectively search for the actual truth, we must isolate ourselves from our own bias.
I usually just resort to the fewest fallacies.
If one's perception of what fallacy is is based solely upon what the MSM and google engineers and feeds lefties, then one's perception is owned and engineered by the MSM and Google.
If the "gospel Truth" is based solely upon right wing perception of any unsound reasoning, then right wingers are even less well informed.
You are starting to see the way, but we need resent and distrust BOTH kinds of media sources. If you trust either type of biased media, they will own you and your perception of the political landscape. Subjective research is research that is done to prove your belief or perception, objective research is only looking for the truth.

Lefties have a very difficult time isolating themselves from their own bias, since lefty biased news and propaganda sources are overwhelming and forced upon society.
I demur. Right-Wingers resort to mostly nothing but Bigotry not any valid arguments or sound reasoning. Anyone can read it for themselves here in the public domain.
A remarkably subjective post, not just anyone can be objective. I don't come across many lefties who can step away from their subjective ideology long enough to objectively evaluate political news and topics. Understanding objective thought vs subjective thought is one of the big differences between lefties and righties.

Screenshot_20210506-074915_DuckDuckGo.jpg
 
I just did a search on two different sites. Google and DuckDuckGo. I got similar results but duckduckgo gave me more right wing viewpoints.

In all, I found the right wing view points to employ less sound reasoning.
We each have our own bias, as does each source of information. If we subjectively research or vet a news story or topic, we search via sources that confirm our bias. If we objectively research a news story or topic, then we search all sources, regardless of the bias of the source, for the actual truth. In order to objectively search for the actual truth, we must isolate ourselves from our own bias.
I usually just resort to the fewest fallacies.
If one's perception of what fallacy is is based solely upon what the MSM and google engineers and feeds lefties, then one's perception is owned and engineered by the MSM and Google.
If the "gospel Truth" is based solely upon right wing perception of any unsound reasoning, then right wingers are even less well informed.
You are starting to see the way, but we need resent and distrust BOTH kinds of media sources. If you trust either type of biased media, they will own you and your perception of the political landscape. Subjective research is research that is done to prove your belief or perception, objective research is only looking for the truth.

Lefties have a very difficult time isolating themselves from their own bias, since lefty biased news and propaganda sources are overwhelming and forced upon society.
I demur. Right-Wingers resort to mostly nothing but Bigotry not any valid arguments or sound reasoning. Anyone can read it for themselves here in the public domain.
A remarkably subjective post, not just anyone can be objective. I don't come across many lefties who can step away from their subjective ideology long enough to objectively evaluate political news and topics. Understanding objective thought vs subjective thought is one of the big differences between lefties and righties.

View attachment 504059
Same here regarding right-wingers. What a coincidence.
 
Same here regarding right-wingers. What a coincidence.
The difference of course, is that you just had a right winger carefully explain objectively evaluating political topics and stories to you, and differentiate subjective research vs objective research. You will never find a lefty who can demonstrate that he understands how to do this, or who values objective thought more than subjective thought.
 
Same here regarding right-wingers. What a coincidence.
The difference of course, is that you just had a right winger carefully explain objectively evaluating political topics and stories to you, and differentiate subjective research vs objective research. You will never find a lefty who can demonstrate that he understands how to do this, or who values objective thought more than subjective thought.
I don't believe You simply because you are Wrong even though you are on the right because I am Right even though I am on the left. See how easy that is.
 
You anti vaxers and Covid skeptics might want to have a look at this....before you go on the ventilator


Nearly all COVID-19 deaths in the U.S. now are in people who weren’t vaccinated, a staggering demonstration of how effective the shots have been and an indication that deaths per day — now down to under 300 — could be practically zero if everyone eligible got the vaccine.

An Associated Press analysis of available government data from May shows that “breakthrough” infections in fully vaccinated people accounted for fewer than 1,200 of more than 853,000 COVID-19 hospitalizations. That’s about 0.1%.
 

Forum List

Back
Top