pinqy
Gold Member
Being that your interpretation of the article VI of our constitution is wrong, it makes all of your attempted points above mute.Too simple, and vague, as I expected.Was your thread not about Separation of Church and State?The United States Constitution.
Article VI
but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Article VI guaranteed that governance of this country was not limited to Christians, and it was acknowledged at the time that Article VI allowed Jews, Muslims, atheists, Hindus, etc to hold Federal office.
Amendment I is what Jefferson was referring to when he said “this building a wall of separation between Church & State:” that no religion would dominate the government, and that the government would not tell people which religious beliefs were allowed or favor any religious beliefs over others.
And then in Everson v Board of Education of Ewing Township, the SCOTUS ruled that the establishment clause applied to the states via Amendment XIV, ruling that including parochial schools in reimbursing public transportation fares for school children was NOT a violation of the first amendment.
So, which specific parts of the Constitution are you objecting to?
Article VI which allows those of any or no religious belief to hold office?
Amendment I which forbids religious dominance or favoritism?
Or Amendment XIX, which incorporates most of the Bill of Rights, applying them to state and local governments?
I would appreciate (but I do not anticipate) specific legal arguments, not vague rhetorical claims.
Now....focus like a laser, junior
What does this have to do with anything in the thread?
You were objecting to the concept of Church State separation.If this is your attempt to support Leftist, atheism or anti-Americanism.....you've failed miserably.
The concept of this separation was specifically based on the Establishment Clause, but reasonably also can refer to Article VI and the Free Exercise Clause If the 1A, and the incorporation If the establishment and free exercise clauses by Amendment XIV.
Therefore, if you object to the concept of Church State Separation you must also object to the laws that establish the Walk of Separation.
Is that simple enough for you?
There never was any basis for separating our founding based on the Judeo-Christian concepts and faith from governance.
It was presented to allow Babeuf's and Marx's and Hegel's view of the primacy of government over the God-given rights of the individual.
Free exercise of any or no religion has nothing....nothing.....to do with the bogus restrictions of separation of church and state.
Is that simple enough for you?
Let’s try again:
Do you agree that there should be no religious requirement for office? That Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, Wiccans, etc, should all be equally eligible for office?
Do you agree that the government should not favor or support any religion (or group of religions) over any other?
Do you agree that no one should be required, pressured, or encouraged to attend any religious observation or ceremony?
Do you agree that all people have the equal right to express their religion?
Do you agree that majority opinion should have no role in any expression of religion?
And last, an observation from James Madison: “Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects? that the same authority which can force a citizen to contribute three pence only of his property for the support of any one establishment, may force him to conform to any other establishment in all cases whatsoever?”
Your highlighted part involves the non-discrimination of any religion's that are peaceful, and see God (the same God) as the head of their religious beliefs in which makes them compatible to that of our American culture in which had been formed with the Gospels as our guiding light, and in which had been established in our hearts, within our mind's, and has of course the same God of peace set in stone upon that forming in which we accepted from the beginning.
Of course we are to discriminate against any form of belief that endangers or is hostile towards our American beliefs in which includes our religious beliefs that we had brought with us on day one of our establishing of this nation.... Especially with such beliefs still intact. There is no separating us from our religious beliefs, our God or our country in which we have established so long ago. The attempt to do so is an attempt to seize this nation by any means nessesary, and that is unexceptable to the majority of American's to this very day I do believe.
oh, should I repost my posts and ask you to tell me where I stated that you mentioned a religious requirement for office?Too simple, and vague, as I expected.Was your thread not about Separation of Church and State?The United States Constitution.
Article VI
but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
Article VI guaranteed that governance of this country was not limited to Christians, and it was acknowledged at the time that Article VI allowed Jews, Muslims, atheists, Hindus, etc to hold Federal office.
Amendment I is what Jefferson was referring to when he said “this building a wall of separation between Church & State:” that no religion would dominate the government, and that the government would not tell people which religious beliefs were allowed or favor any religious beliefs over others.
And then in Everson v Board of Education of Ewing Township, the SCOTUS ruled that the establishment clause applied to the states via Amendment XIV, ruling that including parochial schools in reimbursing public transportation fares for school children was NOT a violation of the first amendment.
So, which specific parts of the Constitution are you objecting to?
Article VI which allows those of any or no religious belief to hold office?
Amendment I which forbids religious dominance or favoritism?
Or Amendment XIX, which incorporates most of the Bill of Rights, applying them to state and local governments?
I would appreciate (but I do not anticipate) specific legal arguments, not vague rhetorical claims.
Now....focus like a laser, junior
What does this have to do with anything in the thread?
You were objecting to the concept of Church State separation.If this is your attempt to support Leftist, atheism or anti-Americanism.....you've failed miserably.
The concept of this separation was specifically based on the Establishment Clause, but reasonably also can refer to Article VI and the Free Exercise Clause If the 1A, and the incorporation If the establishment and free exercise clauses by Amendment XIV.
Therefore, if you object to the concept of Church State Separation you must also object to the laws that establish the Walk of Separation.
Is that simple enough for you?
There never was any basis for separating our founding based on the Judeo-Christian concepts and faith from governance.
It was presented to allow Babeuf's and Marx's and Hegel's view of the primacy of government over the God-given rights of the individual.
Free exercise of any or no religion has nothing....nothing.....to do with the bogus restrictions of separation of church and state.
Is that simple enough for you?
Let’s try again:
Do you agree that there should be no religious requirement for office? That Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, Wiccans, etc, should all be equally eligible for office?
Do you agree that the government should not favor or support any religion (or group of religions) over any other?
Do you agree that no one should be required, pressured, or encouraged to attend any religious observation or ceremony?
Do you agree that all people have the equal right to express their religion?
Do you agree that majority opinion should have no role in any expression of religion?
And last, an observation from James Madison: “Who does not see that the same authority which can establish Christianity, in exclusion of all other Religions, may establish with the same ease any particular sect of Christians, in exclusion of all other Sects? that the same authority which can force a citizen to contribute three pence only of his property for the support of any one establishment, may force him to conform to any other establishment in all cases whatsoever?”
Read it again, or have someone help you read it....and see if you find any religious requirement for office.
1.The battle cry of the Left…”separation of church and state.” Why? Truth is, America was founded based on the Judeo-Christian faith, the Bible being the most quoted source by our Founders. And those Founders were religious folks who saw America escaping the king as the extension of the Jews escaping Egypt.
The reason our revolution was so different from the violent, homicidal chaos of the French version was the dominant American culture was Anglo-Saxon and Christian. “52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” http://www.davidlimbaugh.com/mt/archives/2010/02/new_column_libe_4.html
They were believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known by Leftists today, “an extremist Fundamentalist hate group.”
Oh.....a "white" extremist Fundamentalist hate group.”
2. The fact is that as part of Western Civilization, we owe our origins to a particular combination of these doctrines: God created every human in His image and human beings are able to investigate and make rational conclusions about the world. These two ideas were born in Jerusalem and Athens, respectively.
[Ben Shapiro]
To claim that America was not created with these ideas is a terrible lie, a scheme to cheat generations of Americans who believe what government school tells them.
Nor is it an accident….it is the plan.
“Once abolish the God and the government becomes the God.” G.K. Chesterton
3. Nor is it a coincidence that the acolyte of Joseph Stalin, that would be Franklin Roosevelt, as his first Supreme Court nominee, chose KKKer Hugo Black, who wrote into jurisprudence, the infamous ‘separation of church and state’ lie. Perhaps Black never saw the motto on the back of the Great Seal…
annuit coeptis Latin. He (God) has favored our undertakings.
It is the motto, adapted from the Aeneid (IX.625), that appears
on the reverse of the Great Seal of the United States.
4. But, why subvert the faith on which this country was built?
Answer: To replace our inheritance, Genesis 1:26, individualism, with the collective.
"The abandonment of the Christian tradition that created the West's most cherished ideal [with] a radical secularism evident in Europe's indifference to God and church- created a vacuum of belief into which many pseudo-religions have poured: scientism, fascism, communism, environmentalism, multiculturalism, sheer hedonism [and Islam] - all have attempted and failed....to provide Europeans with an alternative to Christianity that can show them what is worth living and dying for."
From "Decline and Fall: Europe's Slow-Motion Suicide," by Bruce Thornton
“…will America be made better by curbing religion in the name of secularism, of vice versa?” Ben Shapiro
Any such reference?
No?
So....why did you pretend there was?
See, while some people who speak against the separation of Church and State do want a theocracy, or otherwise explicitly religious government, most don’t. But neither are they explicit in what they do want: what exactly eliminating separation would mean in practice.
So to determine what exactly you want in specific legal details, and which parts of the Constitution you might oppose, I have to ask your opinion on specific topics.
I note that you didn’t actually respond if you think Muslims, atheists, Hindus, Wiccans, should be allowed to run for Congress or President, or be appointed to the Supreme Court. Maybe you’re ok with it, maybe you’re not. I find it curious that you refuse to answer something fairly fundamental to Church State Separation.