CIA Used USAID Funds To Stage Fake Impeachment Hoax Against Trump

mudwhistle

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Jul 21, 2009
Messages
141,051
Reaction score
80,235
Points
2,645
Location
Headmaster's Office, Hogwarts
Everyone is screaming about Kash Patel and Pam Bondi not publishing the Epstein List, but is looks like they've been busy finding out what our government has been up to. And it's really looking bad. Worse than we thought.

They already fired a high ranking CIA official this week, and I expect charges to be forthcoming.



 
You're the dumbest, most gullible idiot who's ever posted. How do fund an impeachment????? Did they pay Trump to make the phone call to the Ukraine. Did they tell him to try to overthrow the government.

You have to be certifiably stupid to fall for this one.
RLMAO!!!

Lady, you're the one who doesn't know what they're talking about.

I used to be in the field. I know how this works. You don't.

When I was in the JSOTF in Somalia under UNISOM the Summer of 93' they were paying bribes to locals to rat out Mohamed Farrah Aideed. One of the ways the Dark Community gets intel is by buying information. Where do you think that money comes from?

01aaaaadad.webp


Stop being a gullible commie Dumbass.
 

Terry Adirim was dismissed from her post at the CIA after playing a leading role in the Biden-era Pentagon directive requiring troops to receive COVID vaccinations.


Terry Adirim, a senior official at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and former Defense Department appointee under President Joe Biden, was terminated from her post last week due to her involvement in the implementation of the military’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate......

OP are you talking about two different things here? You might want to clean it up some. :dunno:
 
RLMAO!!!

Lady, you're the one who doesn't know what they're talking about.

I used to be in the field. I know how this works. You don't.

When I was in the JSOTF in Somalia under UNISOM the Summer of 93' they were paying bribes to locals to rat out Mohamed Farrah Aideed. One of the ways the Dark Community gets intel is by buying information. Where do you think that money comes from?

View attachment 1104172

Stop being a gullible commie Dumbass.

You have to be the dumbest most gullible person I have ever encountered. Yes, we're well aware that USAID was funding intel going to the CIA, and promoting American interests in Third World countries. That's what is SUPPOSED to do, moron.

You still haven't explained how USAID funded Trump's phone call to the Ukraine, or the January 6th insurrection. That's the part which proves you're a moron.

When you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything.
 

Terry Adirim was dismissed from her post at the CIA after playing a leading role in the Biden-era Pentagon directive requiring troops to receive COVID vaccinations.


Terry Adirim, a senior official at the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and former Defense Department appointee under President Joe Biden, was terminated from her post last week due to her involvement in the implementation of the military’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate......

OP are you talking about two different things here? You might want to clean it up some. :dunno:
No cleaning up needed.

They're focusing on the CIA and their illegal activities.

I pointed out only one issue. I expect more heads to roll in the future.

Does that clean some stuff up enough for you?
 
You have to be the dumbest most gullible person I have ever encountered. Yes, we're well aware that USAID was funding intel going to the CIA, and promoting American interests in Third World countries. That's what is SUPPOSED to do, moron.

You still haven't explained how USAID funded Trump's phone call to the Ukraine, or the January 6th insurrection. That's the part which proves you're a moron.

When you stand for nothing, you'll fall for anything.
Nobody said USAID funded Trump's phone call, shitforbrains.

Trump used a secure phone at the White House that was monitored by NSA.

God Damn, you're a f*cking idiot.
 
Conclusion
USAID has provided significant funding to OCCRP, with documented grants totaling over $170 million, and nearly half of OCCRP’s budget reportedly comes from USAID. However, the specific allegation that these funds were used to produce a report for Trump’s 2019 impeachment remains unverified without primary evidence. Broader concerns about USAID’s funding practices, including its history of regime change operations and lack of transparency, lend plausibility to the claims but do not confirm them. Further investigation, such as accessing the alleged OCCRP report or USAID grant agreements, would be needed to substantiate the connection to Trump’s impeachment.
 
Not really. 😐
Okay.....let me spell it out for you.

The Trump adm is busy investigating the CIA.

They're finding things like this:


USAID has provided significant funding to OCCRP, with documented grants totaling over $170 million, and nearly half of OCCRP’s budget reportedly comes from USAID. However, the specific allegation that these funds were used to produce a report for Trump’s 2019 impeachment remains unverified without primary evidence. Broader concerns about USAID’s funding practices, including its history of regime change operations and lack of transparency, lend plausibility to the claims but do not confirm them. Further investigation, such as accessing the alleged OCCRP report or USAID grant agreements, would be needed to substantiate the connection to Trump’s impeachment.

Does this connect any dots for you?


The CIA is illegally using USAID funds to cause regime change in the United States. We know they've been doing it in countries like Venezuela....but this is proof they're doing is in CONUS.
 
Okay.....let me spell it out to you.

The Trump adm is busy investigating the CIA.

They're finding things like this:


USAID has provided significant funding to OCCRP, with documented grants totaling over $170 million, and nearly half of OCCRP’s budget reportedly comes from USAID. However, the specific allegation that these funds were used to produce a report for Trump’s 2019 impeachment remains unverified without primary evidence. Broader concerns about USAID’s funding practices, including its history of regime change operations and lack of transparency, lend plausibility to the claims but do not confirm them. Further investigation, such as accessing the alleged OCCRP report or USAID grant agreements, would be needed to substantiate the connection to Trump’s impeachment.

Does this connect any dots for you?


The CIA is illegally using USAID funds to cause regime change in the United States. We know they've been doing it in countries like Venezuela....but this is proof they're doing is in CONUS.
It would have been better to report each case in a separate thread.....You don't get points for economy here. ;)
 
Not really. 😐
Sometimes you have to get rid of bad actors with lessor issues so you can get them out, and worry about proving the bigger issues later, because court cases take time.

Reminds me of how they got rid of Al Capone with tax evasion charges knowing he was guilty of racketeering and murder charges. They locked him up on something simple to prove.

The firing of a high level CIA official is just scratching the surface. There's a lot more going on that they have to deal with. I only provided her as an example of what's going on in the CIA. These people are currently plotting an assassination of Trump. They want to get rid of them ASAP.
 
It would have been better to report each case in a separate thread.....You don't get points for economy here. ;)
Well, your opinion is duly noted.

This is, after all, a message board, not an official legal webpage.

And thanks for taking an unnecessary crap on my thread.
 
You are the one that is belaboring the point.
No I'm not.
You brought this point up. I didn't.

Anyone with half a brain can see that this situation with the CIA is more complex than it appears.

I expect more of it will be made public in the future. However, a lot of it is still classified, so we won't be able to connect all of the dots till some time in the future. I simply pointed out that pieces are being moved and actions are taking place that aren't open to public viewing. They announce a firing, but the real reasons for the firing may be totally different than the public statements they issue to justify them.

Do you follow me?
 
No I'm not.
You brought this point up. I didn't.

Anyone with half a brain can see that this situation with the CIA is more complex than it appears.

I expect more of it will be made public in the future. However, a lot of it is still classified, so we won't be able to connect all of the dots till some time in the future. I simply pointed out that pieces are being moved and actions are taking place that aren't open to public viewing. They announce a firing, but the real reasons for the firing may be totally different than the public statements they issue to justify them.

Do you follow me?
be·la·bor
[bəˈlābər]
verb

  1. argue or elaborate (a subject) in excessive detail:
 
Back
Top Bottom