DGS49
Diamond Member

EPA Administration Says $20 Billion Grants to Climate Groups Are Now Terminated
The move was announced in a post on Tuesday.
The mind reels. If (1) Congress spends money that it lacks the Constitutional "power" to spend, and (2) passes an unconstitutional law that removes the President's power to decline go through with unconstitutional spending because in his judgment it is both wasteful and unconstituitonal, and (3) the President flouts this law by cancelling such spending, what is a Constitutional scholar to make of it? It is a puzzle.
According to one of the beneficiaries of the cancelled spending, “This is not just an attack on clean energy investments—it’s a blatant violation of the Constitution,” said Lena Moffitt, executive director of Evergreen Action, an environmental group that supports the project, in a statement last month. “The Trump team is once again trying to illegally slash programs meant to help American families to fund tax cuts for billionaires.”
But where in the Constitution does Congress get the "power" to "help American families"? Or to save the planet, for that matter? I've scoured the Constitution countless times, and Congress does not have the power to "help" any individual. Ever. Whether that "help" takes the form of food, healthcare, housing, education, or free dog food, it ain't in there.