Climate Change CO2 Question

ReinyDays said:
Argon's atomic weight is 40 amu ... or 40 grams per mole ... we use addition to find the atomic weight of carbon dioxide ... (1 x 12) + (2 x 16) ... more like 44 grams per mole ... is your periodic chart up-to-date? ... there has been a few changes in the past 300 years ...

Have you contacted Anderson Window Inc. about this discrepancy in their literature? ... water vapor is the best far and away, but keeping windows at 225ºF is a safety hazard ...

If you live near a coal seam I wouldn't bother ...
Click to expand...

Do we have atmospheric water vapor readings from 1850?

Asking for a Denier friend
 
CrusaderFrank said:
Do we have atmospheric water vapor readings from 1850?

Asking for a Denier friend
Click to expand...

That's a very odd question ... the equilibrium state is 100% RH ... so in 1850 BC, we would read either 100% RH or rising RH's until we reach 100% ...

That's true on Mars as well ... it doesn't matter to humidity if it's our original atmosphere of carbon dioxide or the biologically altered N2/O2 atmosphere we have today ... so it's safe to say RH was 100% for these past four billion years ... but just within the Asteroid belt ... the Giants have a hydrogen atmosphere and I have no idea if there's water vapor as well ... doubtful there's liquid water at the surface ... my understanding is that it's liquid helium ...
 
ReinyDays said:
That's a very odd question ... the equilibrium state is 100% RH ... so in 1850 BC, we would read either 100% RH or rising RH's until we reach 100% ...

That's true on Mars as well ... it doesn't matter to humidity if it's our original atmosphere of carbon dioxide or the biologically altered N2/O2 atmosphere we have today ... so it's safe to say RH was 100% for these past four billion years ... but just within the Asteroid belt ... the Giants have a hydrogen atmosphere and I have no idea if there's water vapor as well ... doubtful there's liquid water at the surface ... my understanding is that it's liquid helium ...
Click to expand...

Interesting so there's never as much as a .01% variance in atmospheric CO2 over any time period?

Are you sure?
 
ReinyDays said:
That's a very odd question ... the equilibrium state is 100% RH ... so in 1850 BC, we would read either 100% RH or rising RH's until we reach 100% ...

That's true on Mars as well ... it doesn't matter to humidity if it's our original atmosphere of carbon dioxide or the biologically altered N2/O2 atmosphere we have today ... so it's safe to say RH was 100% for these past four billion years ... but just within the Asteroid belt ... the Giants have a hydrogen atmosphere and I have no idea if there's water vapor as well ... doubtful there's liquid water at the surface ... my understanding is that it's liquid helium ...
Click to expand...

So the "Melting ice caps" have no effect whatsoever on atmospheric H2O?
 
ReinyDays said:
Ever since liquid water collected on Earth's surface ... water evaporates and then condenses ... 4 billion years ... won't change until the Laws of Nature are upended ...
Click to expand...

So ice ball earth and no ice cap Earth have the exact same atmospheric H2O
 
CrusaderFrank said:
So ice ball earth and no ice cap Earth have the exact same atmospheric H2O
Click to expand...

Put numbers on the molecules ... the only difference is water vapor would have to sublimate off the ice sheets, rather than evaporate ...

Is there a reason you don't believe me when I state 100% RH is the equilibrium state? ... because once you accept that fact, these questions answer themselves ...
 
ReinyDays said:
Put numbers on the molecules ... the only difference is water vapor would have to sublimate off the ice sheets, rather than evaporate ...

Is there a reason you don't believe me when I state 100% RH is the equilibrium state? ... because once you accept that fact, these questions answer themselves ...
Click to expand...

Well because it sounds ridiculous
 
ReinyDays said:
That doesn't make it wrong ... water molecules are evaporating and condensing all the time ... when these numbers are equal, we have equilibrium, or saturation in meteorological jargon ... 100% RH ... what do you think "equilibrium" means? ...
Click to expand...

Does NOT mean that it never varies due to changes, right?
 
ReinyDays said:
Well ... meteorites add mass to Earth ... which increases gravity ... that kind of change? ...

I guess you don't understand equilibrium ... Big G never changes under Classical, and doesn't exist under Modern ... take your pick ...
Click to expand...

Sorry, I thought you knew what you were talking about. My mistake
 
ReinyDays said:
Well ... meteorites add mass to Earth ... which increases gravity ... that kind of change? ...

I guess you don't understand equilibrium ... Big G never changes under Classical, and doesn't exist under Modern ... take your pick ...
Click to expand...
Doesn’t every new human?

Doesn’t every new pound we all add?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Green transition a joke!

< Previous Thread

Trump 45’s Environmental Reset: 112 Rule Changes

Next Thread >

Similar threads

Delldude
Climate Change is all bunk?
Replies
17
Views
184
Matted Joybeard
M
EMH
The Co2 Fraud for Dummies....
2
Replies
24
Views
757
EMH
EMH
H
Bernie Sanders..Zeldin whether he agreed with Trump that climate change was a hoax.
2
Replies
29
Views
622
jc456
jc456
EMH
Some advice for Lee Zeldin
Replies
7
Views
431
EMH
EMH
H
How will Chris Wright's Secretary of Energy nomination directly affect global warming..
2 3 4
Replies
77
Views
2K
ding
ding

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom