- Moderator
- #221
Gee what a surprise.
CNNs post debate coverage is ALL ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL
Which is funny because the candidates didnt even really talk about birth control, they talked about religious freedom.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Gee what a surprise.
CNNs post debate coverage is ALL ABOUT BIRTH CONTROL
Let's try to keep it real, oh and civil
Ron Paul took Santorum's voting record and stapled it to his forehead. RESULT--Santorum is TOAST--and Newt Gingrich moves in to challenge Romney for the nomination--making a 3rd historic comeback.
Ron Paul had a great debate tonight--but he is still weak on foreign policy.
Newt Gingrich won this debate.
This debate is taking place about a mile from my house. The Mesa Arts Center gets some great plays and now they have the four stooges.
It is a gorgeous theatre despite your take on things.
Q: Are you going to answer the question?
Romney: You get to ask the questions you want, I get to give the answers I want.
An emerging GOP theme (and, imho, a valid one) is taking on the press/media itself. The bias the media exhibits is all too clear. Make their bias an issue. I think we're starting to see it.
Good. It's healthy.
People do not trust politicians. But the American people do not trust the media, either. For good reason.
California Girl - isn't there something to be said for not borrowing money from the bank to "give to charity?" I'm all for helping our fellow citizens of the world...but if we don't have any money, we don't have any money...shouldn't we make sure we are covering the necessities in the U.S. before we spend the massive amounts of money we spend overseas?
Why is it heartless to ask such questions?
Were you his enemy from the get go? Were republicans his enemy from the second he won the election...from day one as they touted?Why does CG disrespect the office of the President. So infantile.
I respect the office.... not the man. He lost my respect the day he called me 'the enemy' simply because my political views are different to his. He disrespects the office, not me. He disrespects Americans.
Ron Paul.... foreign aid is absolutely fucking vital to some of the world's most vulnerable people. Heartless bastard is not a trait I respect in a politician.
Ron Paul is an idiot.
He threw rocks at congress. HE'S PART OF CONGRESS!
Ron Paul is an idiot.
He threw rocks at congress. HE'S PART OF CONGRESS!
Yeah, he's that "part of Congress" they nicknamed Dr. No. Whenever the vote is 434-1, you can find him bucking the system. He's been doing it for years, and it's a damned shame nobody else has listened to him up to this point.
Ron Paul is an idiot.
He threw rocks at congress. HE'S PART OF CONGRESS!
Yeah, he's that "part of Congress" they nicknamed Dr. No. Whenever the vote is 434-1, you can find him bucking the system. He's been doing it for years, and it's a damned shame nobody else has listened to him up to this point.
Like I said the man is an idiot. You should try talking to him one and one. Talk about batshit crazy.... he is that!
Yeah, he's that "part of Congress" they nicknamed Dr. No. Whenever the vote is 434-1, you can find him bucking the system. He's been doing it for years, and it's a damned shame nobody else has listened to him up to this point.
Like I said the man is an idiot. You should try talking to him one and one. Talk about batshit crazy.... he is that!
You're entitled to your opinion, right, wrong or indifferent. Congress approval at 9%, though. Good target for rocks, IMHO.
Like I said the man is an idiot. You should try talking to him one and one. Talk about batshit crazy.... he is that!
You're entitled to your opinion, right, wrong or indifferent. Congress approval at 9%, though. Good target for rocks, IMHO.
9 percent approval and your guy is right in the middle of it.
He's part of the problem and has been since 1996. Well actuually before that in 1979 when he first served as Rep.
So he's throwing rocks at himself which further proves he's an idiot.
Ron Paul is an idiot.
He threw rocks at congress. HE'S PART OF CONGRESS!
Yeah, he's that "part of Congress" they nicknamed Dr. No. Whenever the vote is 434-1, you can find him bucking the system. He's been doing it for years, and it's a damned shame nobody else has listened to him up to this point.
Ron Paul is an idiot.
He threw rocks at congress. HE'S PART OF CONGRESS!
Yeah, he's that "part of Congress" they nicknamed Dr. No. Whenever the vote is 434-1, you can find him bucking the system. He's been doing it for years, and it's a damned shame nobody else has listened to him up to this point.
Yeah..he "bucks" the system alright. As in larding bills with pork and then not voting for them.
He knows they will pass..and he still gets to look clean.
So WHO won the debate?Yeah, he's that "part of Congress" they nicknamed Dr. No. Whenever the vote is 434-1, you can find him bucking the system. He's been doing it for years, and it's a damned shame nobody else has listened to him up to this point.
Yeah..he "bucks" the system alright. As in larding bills with pork and then not voting for them.
He knows they will pass..and he still gets to look clean.
Is it your contention that his constituents have less right to their own money because their Rep has principles?
The point is Paul gets the pork also.Yeah, he's that "part of Congress" they nicknamed Dr. No. Whenever the vote is 434-1, you can find him bucking the system. He's been doing it for years, and it's a damned shame nobody else has listened to him up to this point.
Yeah..he "bucks" the system alright. As in larding bills with pork and then not voting for them.
He knows they will pass..and he still gets to look clean.
Is it your contention that his constituents have less right to their own money because their Rep has principles?
The point is Paul gets the pork also.Yeah..he "bucks" the system alright. As in larding bills with pork and then not voting for them.
He knows they will pass..and he still gets to look clean.
Is it your contention that his constituents have less right to their own money because their Rep has principles?