- Moderator
- #121
I think this has been a very great discussion. All of the candidates are having good points.
LOL, you think?
Yes. Very often. I'd recommend you doing the same sometime
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I think this has been a very great discussion. All of the candidates are having good points.
LOL, you think?
Newt's lying again, Illinois already had a law regarding a viable fetus; the laws Obama voted against concerned NON viable fetuses:Newt says Obama is pro abortion because he voted as state senator to protect doctors who perform abortions. Newt forgets he once supported "exceptions" to his anti abortion stance. How is the manner of conception relevant if one is pro life?
What he was talking about was abortion doctors killing babies that survived the actual abortion.
************************************
When Obama was a state senator, abortion opponents proposed "born alive" legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003. The proposals intent was to require doctors to provide immediate life-saving care to any infant that survived an intended abortion. The legislation, which included multiple bills, specified that an infant surviving a planned abortion is "born alive" and "shall be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate protection under the law."
The bills' supporters said it gave added emphasis to laws already on the books, deterring the death of abortion survivors from neglect. (One of the bills' strongest supporters was a nurse who said she had witnessed infants left to die in dirty utility rooms.) Abortion-rights proponents, on the other hand, said the legislation was a back-door attempt to stop legal abortions.
Illinois already had a law on its books from 1975 that said if a doctor suspected an abortion was scheduled for a viable fetus meaning able to survive outside of the mother's body then the child must receive medical care if it survives the abortion. The new laws didn't distinguish between viable and nonviable, meaning that an infant of any age that survived an abortion should receive care.
late term
Gee, more union bashing by the GOP. Why do they hate working people?
Why do you try to claim that Unions are working people when every American needs to work to live and yet few if any are in unions?
Gee, more union bashing by the GOP. Why do they hate working people?
Why do you try to claim that Unions are working people when every American needs to work to live and yet few if any are in unions?
Yet Boeing is booming on that union labor.
Gee, more union bashing by the GOP. Why do they hate working people?
Why do you try to claim that Unions are working people when every American needs to work to live and yet few if any are in unions?
Yet Boeing is booming on that union labor.
Gingrich is vastly overstating the current level of danger and warfare.
Yes, and an odd one from a guy who didn't serve. Newt's CHEERFUL may take the cake however. Romney & Paul are the best thus far.Santorum breaking from the pack by choosing a noun rather than an adjective to describe himself.
Gingrich is vastly overstating the current level of danger and warfare.
Gee, more union bashing by the GOP. Why do they hate working people?
Because nobody working on an assembly line is worth $71 an hour in wages and bennies.
Because many debts are completely wiped clean and the ones that are reaafirmed are renegotiated to fit the companies new business model post bankruptcy. Many times settled for 50% or less.
Why do you think the bailouts didn't rescue the companies? If they had the subsequent bankruptcies wouldn't have been necessary.
What would be the business model of a company continuing after bankruptcy with negligible assets and large debts? It seems to me that by far the most profit-maximizing plan would be to end the existence of the company.
I don't understand your question, so I'm not sure if I can even grant the premise, much less address it. What bailouts and what companies, and how are you inferring what I think about them?
The auto bailout.
It didn't save gm. It saved the union.
The bankruptcy saved gm.
Apparently this is too complicated for most liberals to understand.
Obama DID NOT SAVE GM. THE BANKRUPTCY JUDGE THAT FORGAVE AND RESTRUCTURED THEIR DEBT DID.
Got it now? All Obama did was line the pockets of the unions.
Gee, more union bashing by the GOP. Why do they hate working people?
Because nobody working on an assembly line is worth $71 an hour in wages and bennies.
I make more than that inspecting commercial airliners. Ask Southwest or Hawaiian Air if they wished they had paid for guys like me beforehand.
No, the following is from Tampa Bay Fact Check, and Obama voted PRESENT on all three bills:Newt's lying again, Illinois already had a law regarding a viable fetus; the laws Obama voted against concerned NON viable fetuses:What he was talking about was abortion doctors killing babies that survived the actual abortion.
************************************
When Obama was a state senator, abortion opponents proposed "born alive" legislation in 2001, 2002 and 2003. The proposals intent was to require doctors to provide immediate life-saving care to any infant that survived an intended abortion. The legislation, which included multiple bills, specified that an infant surviving a planned abortion is "born alive" and "shall be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate protection under the law."
The bills' supporters said it gave added emphasis to laws already on the books, deterring the death of abortion survivors from neglect. (One of the bills' strongest supporters was a nurse who said she had witnessed infants left to die in dirty utility rooms.) Abortion-rights proponents, on the other hand, said the legislation was a back-door attempt to stop legal abortions.
Illinois already had a law on its books from 1975 that said if a doctor suspected an abortion was scheduled for a viable fetus meaning able to survive outside of the mother's body then the child must receive medical care if it survives the abortion. The new laws didn't distinguish between viable and nonviable, meaning that an infant of any age that survived an abortion should receive care.
late term
This is already well known and you are wrong. Obama voted in favor of infanticide