Coca-Cola takes heat after 'Jesus' and 'Trump' not allowed on personalized cans, Kamala Harris is allowed

[d0gbreath]

Damn do you buy drawers that have Trump's picture on them as well.

Just my tightie-whities. He's on the inside, in the back.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Damn do you buy drawers that have Trump's picture on them as well.

What an incendiary question to ask. I don't have any of his products, I simply call out the hypocritical actions of people in media, politics, business or otherwise.

I'm your conscience and it seems I may have upset you.

 

[bendog]

Always with the deep search to find something to be offended by.

You understood she had some logic to this one? JFC. Are they all socialists or something in canada? Does private property mean anything to them?

 

[pknopp]

You understood she had some logic to this one? JFC. Are they all socialists or something in canada? Does private property mean anything to them?

Sadly politics have become many people's religion. Don't be offending their religion.

 

[marvin martian]

Just my tightie-whities. He's on the inside, in the back.

^^^Leftists are compelled to share their humiliating sexual fantasies with the world. I don't get it.

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

I would get a personalized can that says "Share a Coke with Hurricane Helene"

 

[airplanemechanic]

I'm don't try to prevent people from expressing their opinions, that's what the Soviets, N Korea and China do.

I can disagree, but I never try to silence.

You left one out, that's what the left does, too.

 

[bendog]

Sadly politics have become many people's religion. Don't be offending their religion.

So she's pissed Jesus or the Old Weird Guy's pic is on the can ... of coke?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Well, in former East German and the Soviet system, one lead to the other.

Both went bankrupt and were replaced.

Not allowing personalized coke cans for certain names did that?

Holy shit dude... are you okay?

 

[shockedcanadian]

Not allowing personalized coke cans for certain names did that?

Holy shit dude... are you okay?

I am using the broader, more nefarious expansion of such efforts.

Though it may seem unfeasible on the outset, it isn't difficult to truncate individual instances of abnormal interference into citizens freedoms or choices relative to that which is allowed. This holds true for policing, justice, constitutional pursuits, social engineering via media, search engines, or, more simple corporate, subtle, unknown decisions for which we only sometimes see exposed as in this case.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

I am using the broader, more nefarious expansion of such efforts.

Because you know a private company not allowing a couple names on a coke can does not support your paranoid nonsense.

And you would look utterly ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

So you didn't just leap from A to B... you leapt from an unnamed fantasy to B, because A was such a poor and irrelevant example.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Because you know a private company not allowing a couple names on a coke can does not support your paranoid nonsense.

And you would look utterly ridiculous to suggest otherwise.

So you didn't just leap from A to B... you leapt from an unnamed fantasy to B, because A was such a poor and irrelevant example.

There is no paranoia when you have a fact in front of you. Indisputable by the companies own response. What you can have are those like yourself, some perhaps more methodical in their determination to explain and obfuscate the intent.

Trumps name was not allowed on the personalized creation of paying customers, while Harris was allowed.

Stop trying to explain the obvious, you undermine your credibility.

 

[Mister Iggy]

Try commenting on the article.

Yes, i will drink that.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is no paranoia when you have a fact in front of you.

What a stupid response.

Dogs have 4 legs. Therefore the gubmint is coming for me.

Mind numbing.

 

[shockedcanadian]

What a stupid response.

Dogs have 4 legs. Therefore the gubmint is coming for me.

Mind numbing.

You notice of all the countless examples of some sort of accidental bias or oversight, either through government or corporations, none of it ever seem be in favor of Trump and contrary to his opponents interests? This has been the rule since 2016.

You don't have to like him, vote for him or what have you. You don't cut off your nose to spite you face. This seems to be the objective of many for some time now.

 

[task0778]

Coca-Cola takes heat after 'Jesus' and 'Trump' not allowed on personalized cans, Kamala Harris is allowed​

I like Pepsi better anyway. Screw Coke.

Seems like a poor business decision to me. There are a lotta people that will not buy a soda can with Kamala's picture on it, especially if they find out Coke won't allow Jesus or Trump on their cans. But hey, they can play politics all they want cuz I don't like 'em anyway.