colfax_m
Diamond Member
- Nov 18, 2019
- 38,988
- 14,843
- 1,465
I never said they arrested members of the executive. I said they have arrested people who didn't comply with subpoenas. As we can both admit, that's obviously true. I see no reason that executive branch employees would be exempt from that authority.I haven't moved any goal posts.The last arrest was like a century ago. There was a court case about it. Precedent is on my side.
McGrain v. Daugherty - Wikipedia
AND HE GOES FOR THE LIE.
Midland National Bank of Washington Court House is not the Executive branch, lying scumbag. Arresting a bank president is not making war on another branch of the federal government, attempting to use arms against the executive branch is, and an act of treason per article III of the Constitution you have never read.
This coequal branches of government thing REALLY disturbs you.
Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? Where is that written in the Constitution?
Congress has oversight over the executive. That's written into the Constitution. That's is division of power. Without Congressional oversight, the executive would be supreme over all other branches.
Moving the goal posts?
You've got nothing but hate site talking points.
Slither back to your gutter, you're defeated.
When pinned down on your lie that congress has arrested members of the executive branch, which you, as expected, tried to cover up by lying about a bank president in the Tea Pot Dome scandal, you throw out a red herring about "Since when do members of the executive branch get immunity? "
That's called "moving the goals posts," sparky.