basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,045
- 2,220
- Banned
- #1
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you a Nazi? Curbing climate change has nothing to do with messing with white people.Great, a other brown new deal or "fuck whites" deal.
Are you a Nazi? Curbing climate change has nothing to do with messing with white people.Great, a other brown new deal or "fuck whites" deal.
Are you a Nazi? Curbing climate change has nothing to do with messing with white people.Great, a other brown new deal or "fuck whites" deal.
Oh my, the Nazi card. How original.
Just watch the green new deal introductory video by AOC and you will quickly come to realize that it has a lot more to do with being brown, than being green.
The future is very... very... brown.
Bernie Sanders’ version of the Green New Deal will accomplish the same nothing, but for a mere $16 trillion
Sure, that may be a lot of money, but it is considerably cheaper than the Ocasio-Cortez deal, which could cost anywhere between $52 and $93trillion.
Sanders’ scheme calls specifically for the elimination of fossil fuels by the year 2050. In return, the senator promises an additional 20 million jobs.
The senator’s campaign promises the plan will pay for itself within 15 years, in part by making the fossil fuel industry “pay for their pollution, through litigation, fees, and taxes, and eliminating federal fossil fuel subsidies.” Who knew you could tax and sue $16 trillion out of a domestic industry with a market cap that's a small fraction of that amount.
Most interesting of all, however, is what is largely missing from the 35-page climate change document.
China is mentioned only five times and India is mentioned once. Neither country is recognized explicitly for being the world's leaders in pollution, adding on more than enough carbon emissions to offset any US reductions. Sanders’ proposal never once explains how he intends to address either country's carbon footprint. Nor could he.
Also, the word “nuclear” appears only five times throughout the entire document.