It is interesting to note, when talking about New York, the home of Tammany Hall type election thugs, who perfected the art of election fraud using “absentee” ballots (see: 1931: Tammany Hall, Voter Fraud, and Sullivan County), and that New Yorkers recently rejected a constitutional amendment that would have allowed no-excuse mail in voting, which the communist controlled legislature of N.Y. ignored by then passing legislation allowing no-excuse mail in ballots, which authoritarian Governor Hochul SIGNED INTO LAW, ignoring the N.Y. Constitution and the will of the people, and is now being challenged in court, I thought it might be interesting to know how Delaware’s Supreme Court dealt with a similar situation where its government thug legislators and Governor ignored their constitution and attempted to force the allowance of no-excuse mail-in voting and same day registration upon the people, without their approval as required by Delaware's Constitution.
See DDOE v. Higgin 342 2022 12-13
In the opinion’s conclusion found on page 68, striking both no-excuse mail in voting and same-day registration down, the Court rightfully points out:
"Our decision announced two months ago and explained in this opinion is not intended to reflect the Court’s views on the relative advantages and drawbacks of universal absentee voting or a later registration deadline. The resolution of those issues is within the General Assembly’s province. The Court’s role indeed, our duty is to hold the challenged statutory enactments up to the light of our Constitution and determine whether they are consonant or discordant with it. For the reasons discussed in this opinion, we conclude that the Vote-by-Mail Statute and the Same-Day Registration Statute violate the Constitution’s relevant provisions and thus cannot stand. The changes to our election regime embodied in the challenged statutes must be effected, if at all, by constitutional amendment. Accordingly, the Court of Chancery’s judgment as to the Vote-by-Mail Statute is affirmed; as to the Same-Day Registration Statute, it is reversed."
The question now is, will New York’s Supreme Court, as did Delaware’s S.C., strike down the legislative tyranny imposed upon the good people of New York, and instruct New York’s Tammany Hall type government thugs to go pound sand, and ask the people for their consent as the N.Y. Constitution commands?
JWK
The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”
See DDOE v. Higgin 342 2022 12-13
In the opinion’s conclusion found on page 68, striking both no-excuse mail in voting and same-day registration down, the Court rightfully points out:
"Our decision announced two months ago and explained in this opinion is not intended to reflect the Court’s views on the relative advantages and drawbacks of universal absentee voting or a later registration deadline. The resolution of those issues is within the General Assembly’s province. The Court’s role indeed, our duty is to hold the challenged statutory enactments up to the light of our Constitution and determine whether they are consonant or discordant with it. For the reasons discussed in this opinion, we conclude that the Vote-by-Mail Statute and the Same-Day Registration Statute violate the Constitution’s relevant provisions and thus cannot stand. The changes to our election regime embodied in the challenged statutes must be effected, if at all, by constitutional amendment. Accordingly, the Court of Chancery’s judgment as to the Vote-by-Mail Statute is affirmed; as to the Same-Day Registration Statute, it is reversed."
The question now is, will New York’s Supreme Court, as did Delaware’s S.C., strike down the legislative tyranny imposed upon the good people of New York, and instruct New York’s Tammany Hall type government thugs to go pound sand, and ask the people for their consent as the N.Y. Constitution commands?
JWK
The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”
