Do You Believe We Came From Monkeys?

[james bond]

I should add that to my tagline....

Just add it to all your other assertions as truth.

 

[james bond]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Seriously? God created Adam and took a rib and made a woman? Do you also believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and that Donald Trump is a leader?

Yes, God created Adam and Eve. And Donald Trump. Who is more a leader than Obama and has kept the country out of socialism. And if Hillary won, we would e a bankrupt country because she would've misplace/stole $6 B..

It's better than humans from apes and a universe from nothing and having multiverses. Satan's science had to resort to all sorts of lies like Obama and the Clintons, but they still lost.

ETA: It's not so much politics, but science that divides Christians and non-believers. Not that politics doesn't play a part. It's more about people arguments.

 

[RWS]

Lemme say it agin...

You shouldn't need religion to be a good person. If you do, then you're a bad person trying to get away with it...

You just revealed yourself. "You're a bad person trying to get away with it." You reap what you sow.

No, I have been, and always will be, a good person. I don't need religious bullshit to make me do it.

And if and when i stray, maybe I'll ask for forgiveness. So far, at 50 years old, I'm kinda cool with just being a good person....

 

[RWS]

And if there is a heaven, and I'm not accepted because I don't believe....... even though I am a good person......

I will kick his ass.

 

[Wry Catcher]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Seriously? God created Adam and took a rib and made a woman? Do you also believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and that Donald Trump is a leader?

Yes, God created Adam and Eve. And Donald Trump. Who is more a leader than Obama and has kept the country out of socialism. And if Hillary won, we would e a bankrupt country because she would've misplace/stole $6 B..

It's better than humans from apes and a universe from nothing and having multiverses. Satan's science had to resort to all sorts of lies like Obama and the Clintons, but they still lost.

ETA: It's not so much politics, but science that divides Christians and non-believers. Not that politics doesn't play a part. It's more about people arguments.

It seems your post is mostly fantasy and wishfull thinking. As for did God create Adam and Eve no evidence exists - though it seems Lucy was black and the mother of all of us.

As for the $6 Billion you claim HRC would steal or lose, you have the wrong amount and the wrong administration.

see: How the US sent $12bn in cash to Iraq. And watched it vanish

 

[james bond]

Lemme say it agin...

You shouldn't need religion to be a good person. If you do, then you're a bad person trying to get away with it...

You just revealed yourself. "You're a bad person trying to get away with it." You reap what you sow.

No, I have been, and always will be, a good person. I don't need religious bullshit to make me do it.

And if and when i stray, maybe I'll ask for forgiveness. So far, at 50 years old, I'm kinda cool with just being a good person....

Again, you just revealed yourself. "You're a bad person trying to get away with it." You will reap what you sow.

I can demonstrate because you are here making assertions as such with no evidence. To paraphrase CS Lewis, if God is not real, then what does it matter? It’s because you hate God! Why does life matter? Without God nothing makes sense. There is no reality at all. Atheists can’t account for morality. Why is right right and why is wrong wrong? Atheists can’t account for rationality, logic, and intelligence because their worldview will not allow them to. The only way they can is to take upon the Christian theistic worldview.

The fact that you are in this thread shows you know God is real, but hate God so you suppress the truth by you unrighteousness. I don't claim to be a good person, but a sinful one. That's not due to guilt, but the fact that we're all sinners.

"For God’s wrath is being revealed from heaven against all the ungodliness and wickedness of those who in their wickedness suppress the truth. For what can be known about God is plain to them, because God himself has made it plain to them." Romans 1:18-19

"And just as they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them over to a depraved mind, to do what should not be done. They are filled with every kind of unrighteousness, wickedness, covetousness, malice. They are rife with envy, murder, strife, deceit, hostility. They are gossips, slanderers, haters of God, insolent, arrogant, boastful, contrivers of all sorts of evil, disobedient to parents, senseless, covenant-breakers, heartless, ruthless. Although they fully know God’s righteous decree that those who practice such things deserve to die, they not only do them but also approve of those who practice them." Romans 1:28-30

 

[james bond]

I know there are similarities but I think they are coincidental, like cats and seals both have whiskers. But cats didn't come from seals or vice a versa.

Seriously? God created Adam and took a rib and made a woman? Do you also believe in Santa Claus, the Easter Bunny and that Donald Trump is a leader?

Yes, God created Adam and Eve. And Donald Trump. Who is more a leader than Obama and has kept the country out of socialism. And if Hillary won, we would e a bankrupt country because she would've misplace/stole $6 B..

It's better than humans from apes and a universe from nothing and having multiverses. Satan's science had to resort to all sorts of lies like Obama and the Clintons, but they still lost.

ETA: It's not so much politics, but science that divides Christians and non-believers. Not that politics doesn't play a part. It's more about people arguments.

It seems your post is mostly fantasy and wishfull thinking. As for did God create Adam and Eve no evidence exists - though it seems Lucy was black and the mother of all of us.

As for the $6 Billion you claim HRC would steal or lose, you have the wrong amount and the wrong administration.

see: How the US sent $12bn in cash to Iraq. And watched it vanish

There is no observable evidence for humans came from apes. Apes can't even walk bipedal. While Bill Nye “the Science Guy,” who lives, breathes and smells evolution, said it is not crazy to believe we descended from Martians. Ha ha. What an idiot! There is absolutely no proof of that nor Martians.

Yet, he thinks believing we came from Adam and Eve is not using our heads. More wackiness from the wacktards!

There is scientific evidence to support what the Bible says about human origins. Genetic studies have shown there is a very small difference in the DNA of any two people -- only a tenth of a percent. If humanity were hundreds of thousands of years old, as secular scientists claim, we would expect there to be huge differences between people groups. Yet, there is not! This confirms the starting population of only two people, as described in the Bible.

There is no evidence we descended from imaginary Martians ha ha.

(As for the rest, this isn't the political forum so you got your say and I got mine so will leave it at that.)

 

[Old Rocks]

You know, Bond, you are one dumb fuck. The evidence is in every cell in your body. You are a great ape. Your closed relative in the animal kingdom is a chimpanzee. However, as your posts indicate, you probably are a throwback to when the monkeys and apes diverged. LOL

 

[james bond]

You know, Bond, you are one dumb fuck. The evidence is in every cell in your body. You are a great ape. Your closed relative in the animal kingdom is a chimpanzee. However, as your posts indicate, you probably are a throwback to when the monkeys and apes diverged. LOL

Old Rocks You are dumb as fuck. There is no evidence of monkey in my beautiful body nor anyone's body. Maybe you have a monkey brain, but likely a monkey's brain will be larger than yours. Why don't you videotape yourself and run around like a monkey for us, shit in your hands and put it in your mouth and spit. Then we can all have some laughs and entertainment instead of the torture of reading your idiotic posts..

 

[sparky]

The evidence is in every cell in your body. You are a great ape. Your closed relative in the animal kingdom is a chimpanzee.

there goes my spore theory..... ~S~

 

[Syriusly]

Here's the evidence for no tree of life and no common ancestor -- eukaryogenesis doesn't happen.

Archaeal ancestors of eukaryotes: not so elusive any more

Sorry, you are wrong again.

Almost redundant to even bother to point out that he is wrong again- he is after all talking about evolution- and also believes that water once covered the entire earth- including Mt. Everest.

 

[james bond]

Here's the evidence for no tree of life and no common ancestor -- eukaryogenesis doesn't happen.

Archaeal ancestors of eukaryotes: not so elusive any more

Sorry, you are wrong again.

Almost redundant to even bother to point out that he is wrong again- he is after all talking about evolution- and also believes that water once covered the entire earth- including Mt. Everest.

Yet, you have no explanation for the water. What other planet has this much water on the surface? Hint: Look for planets with plate tectonics.

 

[james bond]

At least, I know some basic geology of Mt. Everest unlike a couple posters here. Science backs up the Bible.

"Peak Formation and Fossils
As two crustal plates collide, heavier rock is pushed back down into the earth's mantle at the point of contact. Meanwhile, lighter rock such as limestone and sandstone is pushed upward to form the towering mountains. At the tops of the highest peaks, like that of Mount Everest, it is possible to find 400-million-year-old fossils of sea creatures and shells that were deposited at the bottom of shallow tropical seas. Now the fossils are exposed at the roof of the world, over 25,000 feet above sea level.


Marine Limestone
The peak of Mount Everest is made up of rock that was once submerged beneath the Tethys Sea, an open waterway that existed between the Indian subcontinent and Asia over 400 million years ago. For the great nature writer John McPhee, this is the most significant fact about the mountain:


When the climbers in 1953 planted their flags on the highest mountain, they set them in snow over the skeletons of creatures that had lived in the warm clear ocean that India, moving north, blanked out. Possibly as much as twenty thousand feet below the seafloor, the skeletal remains had turned into rock. This one fact is a treatise in itself on the movements of the surface of the earth. If by some fiat I had to restrict all this writing to one sentence, this is the one I would choose: The summit of Mt. Everest is marine limestone."

The History of Mount Everest, the World's Tallest Mountain

 

[james bond]

And if there is a heaven, and I'm not accepted because I don't believe....... even though I am a good person......

I will kick his ass.

Okay, I'll ask Jesus to allow me to witness that . It may take place circa 2060 if Sir Isaac Newton was right.

 

[ChesBayJJ]

At least, I know some basic geology of Mt. Everest unlike a couple posters here. Science backs up the Bible.

"Peak Formation and Fossils
As two crustal plates collide, heavier rock is pushed back down into the earth's mantle at the point of contact. Meanwhile, lighter rock such as limestone and sandstone is pushed upward to form the towering mountains. At the tops of the highest peaks, like that of Mount Everest, it is possible to find 400-million-year-old fossils of sea creatures and shells that were deposited at the bottom of shallow tropical seas. Now the fossils are exposed at the roof of the world, over 25,000 feet above sea level.


Marine Limestone
The peak of Mount Everest is made up of rock that was once submerged beneath the Tethys Sea, an open waterway that existed between the Indian subcontinent and Asia over 400 million years ago. For the great nature writer John McPhee, this is the most significant fact about the mountain:


When the climbers in 1953 planted their flags on the highest mountain, they set them in snow over the skeletons of creatures that had lived in the warm clear ocean that India, moving north, blanked out. Possibly as much as twenty thousand feet below the seafloor, the skeletal remains had turned into rock. This one fact is a treatise in itself on the movements of the surface of the earth. If by some fiat I had to restrict all this writing to one sentence, this is the one I would choose: The summit of Mt. Everest is marine limestone."

The History of Mount Everest, the World's Tallest Mountain

And the limestone has nothing to do with a global flood 6000 years ago. As the post states, the fossils are 400 million years old and were elevated to their lofty position by the activity of plate tectonics.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

At least, I know some basic geology of Mt. Everest unlike a couple posters here. Science backs up the Bible.

"Peak Formation and Fossils
As two crustal plates collide, heavier rock is pushed back down into the earth's mantle at the point of contact. Meanwhile, lighter rock such as limestone and sandstone is pushed upward to form the towering mountains. At the tops of the highest peaks, like that of Mount Everest, it is possible to find 400-million-year-old fossils of sea creatures and shells that were deposited at the bottom of shallow tropical seas. Now the fossils are exposed at the roof of the world, over 25,000 feet above sea level.


Marine Limestone
The peak of Mount Everest is made up of rock that was once submerged beneath the Tethys Sea, an open waterway that existed between the Indian subcontinent and Asia over 400 million years ago. For the great nature writer John McPhee, this is the most significant fact about the mountain:


When the climbers in 1953 planted their flags on the highest mountain, they set them in snow over the skeletons of creatures that had lived in the warm clear ocean that India, moving north, blanked out. Possibly as much as twenty thousand feet below the seafloor, the skeletal remains had turned into rock. This one fact is a treatise in itself on the movements of the surface of the earth. If by some fiat I had to restrict all this writing to one sentence, this is the one I would choose: The summit of Mt. Everest is marine limestone."

The History of Mount Everest, the World's Tallest Mountain

Of course, that took a long time , directly contradicting your Bronze Age Fairy Tail

 

[Syriusly]

At least, I know some basic geology of Mt. Everest unlike a couple posters here. Science backs up the Bible.

"Peak Formation and Fossils
As two crustal plates collide, heavier rock is pushed back down into the earth's mantle at the point of contact. Meanwhile, lighter rock such as limestone and sandstone is pushed upward to form the towering mountains. At the tops of the highest peaks, like that of Mount Everest, it is possible to find 400-million-year-old fossils of sea creatures and shells that were deposited at the bottom of shallow tropical seas. Now the fossils are exposed at the roof of the world, over 25,000 feet above sea level.

Absolutely- there are 400 million year old fossils over 25,000 feet above sea level.

Your answer is that means that 6,000 years ago the ark floated by......a scientists answer is that 400 million years ago Mt. Everest was not a mountain- but 6,000 years ago it was maybe a few feet shorter.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

At least, I know some basic geology of Mt. Everest unlike a couple posters here. Science backs up the Bible.

"Peak Formation and Fossils
As two crustal plates collide, heavier rock is pushed back down into the earth's mantle at the point of contact. Meanwhile, lighter rock such as limestone and sandstone is pushed upward to form the towering mountains. At the tops of the highest peaks, like that of Mount Everest, it is possible to find 400-million-year-old fossils of sea creatures and shells that were deposited at the bottom of shallow tropical seas. Now the fossils are exposed at the roof of the world, over 25,000 feet above sea level.

Absolutely- there are 400 million year old fossils over 25,000 feet above sea level.

Your answer is that means that 6,000 years ago the ark floated by......a scientists answer is that 400 million years ago Mt. Everest was not a mountain- but 6,000 years ago it was maybe a few feet shorter.

Nah man, you're not getting this. all science is wrong, because it contradicts the Bible. And all Science is correct, because it all supports the Bible.

Got it?

 

[Syriusly]

At least, I know some basic geology of Mt. Everest unlike a couple posters here. Science backs up the Bible.

"Peak Formation and Fossils
As two crustal plates collide, heavier rock is pushed back down into the earth's mantle at the point of contact. Meanwhile, lighter rock such as limestone and sandstone is pushed upward to form the towering mountains. At the tops of the highest peaks, like that of Mount Everest, it is possible to find 400-million-year-old fossils of sea creatures and shells that were deposited at the bottom of shallow tropical seas. Now the fossils are exposed at the roof of the world, over 25,000 feet above sea level.

Absolutely- there are 400 million year old fossils over 25,000 feet above sea level.

Your answer is that means that 6,000 years ago the ark floated by......a scientists answer is that 400 million years ago Mt. Everest was not a mountain- but 6,000 years ago it was maybe a few feet shorter.

Nah man, you're not getting this. all science is wrong, because it contradicts the Bible. And all Science is correct, because it all supports the Bible.

Got it?

 

[Syriusly]