- Jul 26, 2010
- 37,151
- 12,647
Where was the plan?/—-/ He answers them all the time. Now post a link proving otherwise, you chump.
That was just more of the usual.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where was the plan?/—-/ He answers them all the time. Now post a link proving otherwise, you chump.
/—-/ The plan is the plan. He is sticking to it. You’re used to democRATs who change positions as the wind shifts.Where was the plan?
That was just more of the usual.
Which equals no plan./—-/ The plan is the plan. He is sticking to it. You’re used to democRATs who change positions as the wind shifts.
/——/ You are a joke. Go pound sand.Which equals no plan.
Like trump on the florida abortion bill./—-/ The plan is the plan. He is sticking to it. You’re used to democRATs who change positions as the wind shifts.
Um... there are no plans there./—-/ He answers them all the time. Now post a link proving otherwise, you chump.
There’s no plan. There’s barely even a concept of a plan./—-/ The plan is the plan. He is sticking to it. You’re used to democRATs who change positions as the wind shifts.
The joke is on you clown, go peddle that bullshit somewhere else./——/ You are a joke. Go pound sand.
"Donald Trump is a threat to democracy. That was true before an assassination attempt was foiled at his golf course Sunday, and it remains true after. Political violence in general, and assassinating presidential candidates specifically, also poses risks to democracy.
There is no contradiction between these ideas whatsoever. Yet Trump’s supporters have responded to both attempts on his life by muddying the waters, exploiting the near-tragedies with cynical efforts to redefine critiques of Trump’s authoritarian inclinations as violent provocation.
[…]
There is a more serious conceptual problem with the argument that denouncing Trump as a threat to democracy inspired violence: It ignores the truth or falsity of the matter. Taken at face value, the argument implies that we cannot say a presidential candidate threatens democracy even if he plainly does. A party could nominate a candidate who openly promises to end elections and imprison all his critics, and the opposing party would be prevented from describing this candidate as a threat to democracy for fear of inspiring assassination attempts...”
Donald Trump Is a Threat to Democracy, and Saying So Is Not Incitement
Opposing political violence does not mean ignoring authoritarianism.nymag.com
Republicans need to stop lying that appropriate, factual, warranted criticism of Trump is somehow ‘inciting’ violence against Trump.
You are inciting people to take shots at Trump and you don't give a damn."Donald Trump is a threat to democracy. That was true before an assassination attempt was foiled at his golf course Sunday, and it remains true after. Political violence in general, and assassinating presidential candidates specifically, also poses risks to democracy.
There is no contradiction between these ideas whatsoever. Yet Trump’s supporters have responded to both attempts on his life by muddying the waters, exploiting the near-tragedies with cynical efforts to redefine critiques of Trump’s authoritarian inclinations as violent provocation.
[…]
There is a more serious conceptual problem with the argument that denouncing Trump as a threat to democracy inspired violence: It ignores the truth or falsity of the matter. Taken at face value, the argument implies that we cannot say a presidential candidate threatens democracy even if he plainly does. A party could nominate a candidate who openly promises to end elections and imprison all his critics, and the opposing party would be prevented from describing this candidate as a threat to democracy for fear of inspiring assassination attempts...”
Donald Trump Is a Threat to Democracy, and Saying So Is Not Incitement
Opposing political violence does not mean ignoring authoritarianism.nymag.com
Republicans need to stop lying that appropriate, factual, warranted criticism of Trump is somehow ‘inciting’ violence against Trump.
You of course don't actually believe this, but you ran out of the spoonfed talking points. So it's trolling time.You are inciting people to take shots at Trump and you don't give a damn.
It has nothing to do with me. Leftists say that Trump will take democracy away and Trump gets shot at twice. Are you a fact denier?You of course don't actually believe this, but you ran out of the spoonfed talking points. So it's trolling time.
So what?Leftists say that Trump will take democracy away and Trump gets shot at twice.
I'm not sure what nonsense they are pouring into your brain, across the pond...A democracy is only as strong as the education of it's people.
That's why the Democrat party like to keep their base thick.
Right on cue, you can't make this stuff up, Lefty numpty comes flying in, lolI'm not sure what nonsense they are pouring into your brain, across the pond...
But you might want to get up to speed.
A College-Educated Party?
A College-Educated Party? The Democratic Party has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last two decades. Nearly half (48 percent) of Democrats today have a four-year college degree, a dramatic increase since the last 1990s when only about one in four had a college education. Much of...www.americansurveycenter.org
I see you're used to making up lies and being corrected.Right on cue, you can't make this stuff up, Lefty numpty comes flying in, lol