Kevin_Kennedy
Defend Liberty
- Aug 27, 2008
- 18,553
- 1,923
- 245
wiki is sourced.. and were the TWO sources I provided on top of that from two of your own usual stomping ground.
oh my, an "institute". How impressive.
*yawn*
maybe I can get a shout out from a "Think Tank" next.
The point being that I never said China was a free market. They obviously are a centrally planned economy, even more so than the U.S. is. But you can't deny that their status as an economic power has gone up since they've introduced capitalistic reforms. They were a stagnant third world country under Mao and communism, but they've become what they are today thanks to capitalistic reforms.
Now you would rather attack my source as a "blog," despite the Mises Institute being one of the foremost economic resources on the web. Attacking the source means that you can't attack the information, which means you have no argument. If you did, you could discuss the information regardless of the source.
no, the POINT being that your kind always avoid the albatross of the very same COMMIE CHINA which benefits from your bullshit free market opinion. No, what I can't deny is that they are BENEFITING from your kind who are willing to sell out America for pennies on the Renminbi as long as if lines the pockets of a scant few in relation to the general population. They are a communist nation. Economically ans socially. THAT, despite the above insistance otherwise, is the cold, hard fact regarding this economic partner that you people hold so dear. Hell, if CUBA were treated like CHINA we'd see a fucking economic blossom in Havana too. You say "stagnant third world nation under mao communism"....
..... DESPITE THAT THEY ARE STILL A FUCKING MAO COMMIE NATION. They are what they are today because your kind keep making reasons to give them wealth under FMC as if they are not going to take it. Certainly, since they don't seem to have to trade on par with what they produce and sell to us, no less.
and no, attacking sources means that I hold a standard for information above some silly fucking www.Iagreewithmyself.com website that anyone can create. Hell, Nambla has as much online validity as what you've posted. Maybe instead of crying about my standard for evidence you should make some effort to find some that isn't so fucking pathetic that it looks like sean hannity citing drudge who picked up a story from newsmax.
If you look at what they call their political party yes you would come to the conclusion that they're communist. If you look at their actual economy, however, the truth is they're a mixed economy just like the U.S. Now you can work yourself up into a righteous anger if you want, but you're not going to change reality.
Yes, anyone could go and create the equivalent to the Mises Institute no problem. With their thousands of articles, books, journals, conferences, debates, and so on and so forth online for free. Yes, that's easily imitated no doubt about it.