Feds in Portland Brutalize Navy Vet.

[Canon Shooter]

he was across the fucking street? how you gonna spin that?

Across the street?

Man, I'd call that some damn fine shootin'!

As for the shithead's mother, why isn't she shoving photos of her little snowflake scumbag into the faces of the other snowflake scumbags?

 

[meaner gene]

The intimidation factor of running around in unmarked vans, with unmarked uniforms, and unidentifiable Federal Agents, seems to be backfiring. As anyone with a brain could have figured out it would.

If they're unidentifiable, how do you know they're federal agents?

Regardless, his status as a Navy Vet gives him no special privileges...

That's the point. Trump and Barr said they're federal law enforcement agents. So you have official notice that federal agents are performing law enforcement in cammo uniforms without badges, identification or insignias on their "uniforms". Driving unmarked vehicles, and arresting people under color of law.

This is problematic because civilians can legally dress in identical garb, and pretend to be federal law enforcement, and they commit no crime

 

[Muhammed]

The obvious reason he got hit is because he didn't move away from the building like the other protesters in the video did.

The fact that he was in the street is totally irrelevant, dumbass.

You got caught in a lie, claiming it was because he was near the courthouse. His being in the street is proof of your lie.

Busted !!!!!

"Near" is a relative term dumbass. The street in front of the courthouse is near the courthouse.

You sure are one stupid whiny bitch, even moreso that the typical moonbat.

 

[Muhammed]

The obvious reason he got hit is because he didn't move away from the building like the other protesters in the video did.

I'll assume you're partisan instead of being stupid. The video shows him standing in the street in front of curb, with a bicycle stand on it.

Since they don't build sidewalks that are lower than the street, and they don't put bicycle racks in the street, photographic evidence is he was standing in a public street.

The fact that he was in the street is totally irrelevant, dumbass.

& him? he was across the fucking street? how you gonna spin that?

I don't spin.

 

[meaner gene]

That's the point. Trump and Barr said they're federal law enforcement agents. So you have official notice that federal agents are performing law enforcement in cammo uniforms without badges, identification or insignias on their "uniforms". Driving unmarked vehicles, and arresting people under color of law.

This is problematic because civilians can legally dress in identical garb, and pretend to be federal law enforcement, and they commit no crime

It also means that private security personnel (whether hired by the federal government or a private individual) can also dress that way, and drive unmarked vehicles and go around arresting people without color of law.

 

[meaner gene]

You got caught in a lie, claiming it was because he was near the courthouse. His being in the street is proof of your lie.

Busted !!!!!

"Near" is a relative term dumbass. The street in front of the courthouse is near the courthouse.

Don't be an idiot, or play one on TV. The street belongs to the city of portland, and the feds have NO (repeat no) jurisdiction over it.

If he was standing in the street he was not (repeat not) on federal property, which all the feds have jurisdiction over.

Wanna try another LIE to get out of your string of lies

 

[meaner gene]

& him? he was across the fucking street? how you gonna spin that?

I don't spin.

He's like a whirling dervish. He says the street is "near" a courthouse over which the feds have legal authority. His argument is that anything within sight of a court house (in the street, or even across the street) is fair game for federal agents.

 

[meaner gene]

The fact that he was in the street is totally irrelevant, dumbass.

I don't spin.

"Near" is a relative term dumbass. The street in front of the courthouse is near the courthouse.

Anybody else notice a pattern of lies?

 

[meaner gene]

 

[meaner gene]

In United States v. Grace, supra, the Supreme Court held that the public sidewalks forming the perimeter of the Supreme Court grounds are traditional public forums, just like other public sidewalks, and that a federal statute prohibiting parading, picketing and similar activity on those sidewalks was unconstitutional.

 

[Muhammed]

You got caught in a lie, claiming it was because he was near the courthouse. His being in the street is proof of your lie.

Busted !!!!!

"Near" is a relative term dumbass. The street in front of the courthouse is near the courthouse.

Don't be an idiot, or play one on TV. The street belongs to the city of portland, and the feds have NO (repeat no) jurisdiction over it.

If he was standing in the street he was not (repeat not) on federal property, which all the feds have jurisdiction over.

Wanna try another LIE to get out of your string of lies

Their jurisdiction is the entirety of the USA and it's territories. That includes the entire city of Portland, you fucking ignorant dumbass.

 

[meaner gene]

Generally, all types of expression are constitutionally protected in traditional "public forms" such as streets, sidewalks, parks and public plazas.

 

[meaner gene]

Their jurisdiction is the entirety of the USA and it's territories. That includes the entire city of Portland, you fucking ignorant dumbass.

United States v. Grace, supra, the Supreme Court says you're an idiot.

 

[meaner gene]

Their jurisdiction is the entirety of the USA and it's territories. That includes the entire city of Portland, you fucking ignorant dumbass.

Since February 1, 1940, the United States acquires no jurisdiction over federal lands in a state until the head or other authorized officer of the department or agency which has custody of the lands formally accepts the jurisdiction offered by state law. See 40 U.S.C. § 255; Adams v. United States, 319 U.S. 312 (1943)

 

[Muhammed]

The fact that he was in the street is totally irrelevant, dumbass.

I don't spin.

"Near" is a relative term dumbass. The street in front of the courthouse is near the courthouse.

Anybody else notice a pattern of lies?

You just think they are lies because you're too fucking stupid to know any better.

 

[Muhammed]

Their jurisdiction is the entirety of the USA and it's territories. That includes the entire city of Portland, you fucking ignorant dumbass.

Since February 1, 1940, the United States acquires no jurisdiction over federal lands in a state until the head or other authorized officer of the department or agency which has custody of the lands formally accepts the jurisdiction offered by state law. See 40 U.S.C. § 255; Adams v. United States, 319 U.S. 312 (1943)

OK I concede that point. I should have said that the feds have the power to arrest anywhere within the USA and it's territories.

 

[Canon Shooter]

This is problematic because civilians can legally dress in identical garb, and pretend to be federal law enforcement, and they commit no crime

Absolutely false.

Impersonating a federal officer is a felony punishable by up to three years in prison:

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/falsely-impersonating-a-federal-officer-what-is-the-penalty-53754

You can dress up as Superman, but it doesn't mean you can fly...

 

[meaner gene]

This is problematic because civilians can legally dress in identical garb, and pretend to be federal law enforcement, and they commit no crime

Absolutely false.

Impersonating a federal officer is a felony punishable by up to three years in prison:

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/falsely-impersonating-a-federal-officer-what-is-the-penalty-53754

You can dress up as Superman, but it doesn't mean you can fly...

These federal agents aren't wearing a standard uniform. They have no bdges no identifiers, and the uniform itself is just cammo gear available from anywhere including sporting goods stores to go hunting.

Nothing they're wearing is identifiable as a federal law enforcement officer. Which means somebody dressing identically, can't be charged with impersonation.

Otherwise everybody who wears a dark suit and sunglasses could be charged with impersonating a secret service agent.

 

[toomuchtime_]

This is problematic because civilians can legally dress in identical garb, and pretend to be federal law enforcement, and they commit no crime

Absolutely false.

Impersonating a federal officer is a felony punishable by up to three years in prison:

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/falsely-impersonating-a-federal-officer-what-is-the-penalty-53754

You can dress up as Superman, but it doesn't mean you can fly...

These federal agents aren't wearing a standard uniform. They have no bdges no identifiers, and the uniform itself is just cammo gear available from anywhere including sporting goods stores to go hunting.

Nothing they're wearing is identifiable as a federal law enforcement officer. Which means somebody dressing identically, can't be charged with impersonation.

Otherwise everybody who wears a dark suit and sunglasses could be charged with impersonating a secret service agent.

As you describe them, they sound just like plainclothes detectives picking up a suspect. Are Democrats now opposed to plainclothes detectives making arrests?

 

[Canon Shooter]

This is problematic because civilians can legally dress in identical garb, and pretend to be federal law enforcement, and they commit no crime

Absolutely false.

Impersonating a federal officer is a felony punishable by up to three years in prison:

https://www.hg.org/legal-articles/falsely-impersonating-a-federal-officer-what-is-the-penalty-53754

You can dress up as Superman, but it doesn't mean you can fly...

These federal agents aren't wearing a standard uniform. They have no bdges no identifiers, and the uniform itself is just cammo gear available from anywhere including sporting goods stores to go hunting.

Nothing they're wearing is identifiable as a federal law enforcement officer. Which means somebody dressing identically, can't be charged with impersonation.

Otherwise everybody who wears a dark suit and sunglasses could be charged with impersonating a secret service agent.

If they "pretend" (your word) they're law enforcement personnel, they've committed a felony. That's not open to debate...