Dick Tuck
Board Troll
- Aug 29, 2009
- 8,511
- 505
- 48
You seem to want to impose your value and finance system on them. Facts are a problem for you too apparently. This plan has been in place 20 years. The people who, "conceived it" are probably not in office. A guy lost his home because he didn't follow rules and someone in his family started a fire. Now, the "community" can look at this and decide for themselves if or how to make changes.
Impose? No, shame those who believe that emergency service should be made available to only those who can afford it, would be a better description of my position.
Suit yourself. It still is a value judgement on your part. By the way, five of the eight fire departments do handle fires without affordibility as a factor. They didn't show up either.
It's my values, attitudes, and belief that people should have access to emergency services regardless of their ability to pay. You're correct, that's my ethic.