For those believing a conspiracy brought down three skyscrapers on 911, see what a gasoline fire did to a major highway in Northern CA.

[Robert W]

We have posters posting that believe that a missile hit the Pentagon and that the skyscrapers came down to planted explosives. We all know that the airplanes burst immediately into massive flames and that it was the flames that took out the skyscrapers. But to see the picture where you see the massive power of flames on steel and concrete, watch this video and let me know if you still think there was a massive conspiracy in NY City on 911 and the Pentagon as well. This was one Tanker truck filled with Gasoline that crashed a major freeway and the bridge as well.

 

[DukeU]

Serious question.

Where is the video of the plane that hit the Pentagon?

There are many videos of the planes that hit WTC, but none of the one that hit the Pentagon???

 

[Oddball]

False equivalence.

Gasoline burns at a much hotter temperature than kerosene....Especially so when it has open access to oxygen.

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Serious question.

Where is the video of the plane that hit the Pentagon?

There are many videos of the planes that hit WTC, but none of the one that hit the Pentagon???

About .03

 

[Oddball]

About .03

Wow....Them there 757s are sooooo huge!

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

Wow....Them there 757s are sooooo huge!

..and going so fast too~

No..it's not a missile...LOl!

 

[Cellblock2429]

Serious question.

Where is the video of the plane that hit the Pentagon?

There are many videos of the planes that hit WTC, but none of the one that hit the Pentagon???

/——-/ YouTube is your friend.

 

[Oddball]

..and going so fast too~

No..it's not a missile...LOl!

What slammed into the Pentagon in that video isn't anywhere near the size of a 757.

 

[DukeU]

About .03

Can't see the video.

 

[Oddball]

Can't see the video.

It's a clear shot of the Mexican staring frog of southern Sri Lanka.

 

[DukeU]

/——-/ YouTube is your friend.

Checked YT, only video doesn't confirm a plane.

 

[DukeU]

..and going so fast too~

No..it's not a missile...LOl!

Not too fast for cameras around WTC.

 

[Nobody911]

We have posters posting that believe that a missile hit the Pentagon and that the skyscrapers came down to planted explosives. We all know that the airplanes burst immediately into massive flames and that it was the flames that took out the skyscrapers. But to see the picture where you see the massive power of flames on steel and concrete, watch this video and let me know if you still think there was a massive conspiracy in NY City on 911 and the Pentagon as well. This was one Tanker truck filled with Gasoline that crashed a major freeway and the bridge as well.

On September 11, 2001, the collapse of the World Trade Center (WTC) buildings was primarily due to the impact of the hijacked airplanes, which severed crucial structural columns and initiated fires fueled by jet fuel.

The intense heat from the fires caused the steel support columns to weaken significantly, leading to the structural failure of the buildings. The impact of the airplanes dislodged fireproofing materials, exposing the steel to higher temperatures than it was designed to withstand.

The combination of the impact damage and the weakening of the steel due to the heat caused the floors to sag and the structural integrity of the buildings to be compromised. As a result, the weight of the floors above the impact zones caused a progressive collapse of each building, ultimately resulting in their complete destruction.

Jet fuel burns at high temperatures, but it typically does not burn hot enough to melt steel beams, which have a melting point of around 2500°F (1370°C). However, in a fire fueled by jet fuel, the intense heat can weaken steel structures, causing them to lose their structural integrity and potentially collapse. This phenomenon is known as "softening" or "weakening" of the steel, rather than melting.

The key factor in the collapse of structures during fires is usually not the melting of steel, but the loss of strength and stiffness due to high temperatures. When steel is heated to high temperatures, it can lose its load-bearing capacity, leading to structural failures. Additionally, fires can cause rapid thermal expansion and distortion of steel components, further compromising the structural integrity of a building.

In summary, while jet fuel fires may not directly melt steel, they can still cause significant damage to steel structures through weakening, softening, and loss of load-bearing capacity, which may ultimately result in structural failure.


The collapse of the WTC buildings was a tragic event resulting from a combination of factors, including the initial impact, the fires, and the structural design of the buildings.

However, the 9/11 might have been an inside job. Who benefited most from the tragedy? Just go ask Dick Cheney! lol.

 

[sparky]

so did these 747's melt too??? ~S~

 

[Cellblock2429]

Checked YT, only video doesn't confirm a plane.

/——/ I’ve learned long ago that convincing you 9/11 deniers is impossible. Only if you were standing there filming it would you believe it. Google: images
plane parts 911 pentagon

And even more:Fact check: Airplane debris was found at Pentagon on 9/11 and footage of attack was released

 

[sparky]

So parts of planes, especially the identifying ones, go through a 2500F fireball that takes down a skyscrapper, and ends up without any notable burn marks?

~S~

 

[Cellblock2429]

So parts of planes, especially the identifying ones, go through a 2500F fireball that takes down a skyscrapper, and ends up without any notable burn marks?

~S~

/----/ The Pentagon is not a skyscraper.

 

[DukeU]

/——/ I’ve learned long ago that convincing you 9/11 deniers is impossible. Only if you were standing there filming it would you believe it. Google: images
plane parts 911 pentagon

And even more:Fact check: Airplane debris was found at Pentagon on 9/11 and footage of attack was released

Just show me the video.

Fact check huh?

Fact check: Donald Rumsfeld DID NOT report that $2.3 Trillion was missing the day before the attacks.

 

[Robert W]

However, the 9/11 might have been an inside job. Who benefited most from the tragedy? Just go ask Dick Cheney!

Cheney's only pay check came to him as VP from the Feds. There was no inside job. All airplanes were accounted for as well as the victims. What I do not understand is that of all the airliner crashes that have happened in this world, why this one is supposedly an inside job?

 

[AZrailwhale]

False equivalence.

Gasoline burns at a much hotter temperature than kerosene....Especially so when it has open access to oxygen.

It isn’t just the heat, it’s the stress. All one member has to do is to weaken just a little bit and it throws a different load on other parts than they were designed to carry. Failures cascade as loads shift resulting in disaster.