SuMar
VIP Member
- Mar 16, 2010
- 1,864
- 328
How is this healthy for the unsuspecting partner that is about to have sex with the HIV recipient?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Joe the Plumber for America? Are you fucking kidding me SuMar?
Typical punk liberal move. Deflecting from topic...Nice try, thanks for playing though.
Planned Parenthood must be hoping more women will become pregnant by HIV partners and seek abortions as a solution.
And would Black Fag like to elaborate on that?Planned Parenthood must be hoping more women will become pregnant by HIV partners and seek abortions as a solution.
Omg what you just said is so stupid on so many levels
Joe the Plumber for America? Are you fucking kidding me SuMar?
How is this healthy for the unsuspecting partner that is about to have sex with the HIV recipient?
Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.
ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF
Ahhh...If only Bristol Palin had taken that advise...she wouldn't be dragging around her bastard child, the product of a drunken, underage fuck session.
The statement never said you don't have to tell your partner , only that it is your right when to disclose. Many laws in countries, and in the US (the states), have laws about having to inform if you have HIV and you have sex..,
How is this healthy for the unsuspecting partner that is about to have sex with the HIV recipient?
Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.
ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF
According to your link, it shows that the HIV recipient can choose to or not disclose their disease.
Of course disclosing the information is the right (and only) thing to do. Encouraging these folks that it's a choice of if or when is careless and not safe. Not disclosing is putting the other partner at risk and should be considered a crime.
The statement never said you don't have to tell your partner , only that it is your right when to disclose. Many laws in countries, and in the US (the states), have laws about having to inform if you have HIV and you have sex..,
There should not be an "if" or "when" when it comes to disclosing the HIV disease. The when should be before engaging in sex.
HIV infected man charged with 21 counts of recklessly risking infection | FOX2now.com
There maybe laws, but how good are the laws to these victims he infected because he chose to keep his mouth shut and not disclose his condition?
Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.
ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF
According to your link, it shows that the HIV recipient can choose to or not disclose their disease.
Of course disclosing the information is the right (and only) thing to do. Encouraging these folks that it's a choice of if or when is careless and not safe. Not disclosing is putting the other partner at risk and should be considered a crime.
Here it is. Of course, the advise is taken totally out of context. Typical for Erick Erickson, who created this faux outrage.
ISSUU - Healthy Happy Hot by IPPF
According to your link, it shows that the HIV recipient can choose to or not disclose their disease.
Of course disclosing the information is the right (and only) thing to do. Encouraging these folks that it's a choice of if or when is careless and not safe. Not disclosing is putting the other partner at risk and should be considered a crime.