DOTR
Gold Member
- Oct 24, 2016
- 14,270
- 3,525
- 290
Wow. Im not convinced sorry. Here i thought I was going to see you use those arguments to support gay marriage licenses. Another lie from you I suppose.
Did you offer reasons for the gov't to recognize marriage? No, you did not. Unless you do, your fail is huge.
I offered five of them. That you dont like them is one thing. That you cant use them to support gay marriage licenses is another.
No, you did not. None of those is a reason for gov't to recognize marriage. Maybe have your Mom read what I said I would do and explain what it means. I am done with your inability to comprehend teh written word.
LOL Yep you had a set you have been taught to ape an answer to. And I refused the liberal script. I say again you slimy liberal YOU dont get top pick the reasons I oppose gay marriage licenses.
I never tried to do that.
I said that any reason you can give for the gov't to recognize marriage. That means you have to show a reason why the gov't should recognize straight marriages, and the same could be said of gay marriage.
I never said I would refute every imagined bit of nonsense you spout about gay marriage. You really cannot comprehend what you read, can you?
I dont have to do anything. YOU dont choose the opposition argument so you can knock it down.
There it is plain as day. I gave you plenty of reasons. Use them to support gay marriage licenses.
No, liar, you did not. You did not give me one reason for the gov't to recognize marriage. You gave me 5 reasons against gay marriage. I refuted each one.
One the Catholic church sets certain rules for marriage.
Is that a reason for the gov't to recognize marriage? No, itis not.
Two in the history of our country, our culture, our religion no man has ever been allowed to marry a man.
Is that a reason for the gov't to recognize marriage? No, it is not.
Three the people of the states limited marriage to only a man and a woman. it is the will of the people ratified by over 37 votes.
Is that a reason for the gov't to recognize marriage? No, it is not.
Four gay marriage licenses will give the impression that society considers legal recognition of gay marriage as beneficial as legal recognition of traditional marriage.
Is that a reason for the gov't to recognize marriage? No, it is not.
Five I believe, and society believes that consenting to a license for two men in a relationship is damaging to families.
Is that a reason for the gov't to recognize marriage? No, it is not.
So the "huge fail" is on your part. Apparently you can't comprehend what you read and you can't stop lying.
Wow. Im not convinced sorry. Here i thought I was going to see you use those arguments to support gay marriage licenses. Another lie from you I suppose.
Did you offer reasons for the gov't to recognize marriage? No, you did not. Unless you do, your fail is huge.
I offered five of them. That you dont like them is one thing. That you cant use them to support gay marriage licenses is another.
Pretend you work for the gov't. And you were looking for reasons to license and recognize marriage.
If one of your people said "The Catholic church sets certain rules for marriage"
Would that be a reason for our gov't to recognize a marriage? No.
Or if they said "In the history of our country, our culture, our religion no man has ever been allowed to marry a man".
Would that be a reason for our gov't to recognize a marriage? No.
Or if they said "The people of the states limited marriage to only a man and a woman. it is the will of the people ratified by over 37 votes".
Would that be a reason for our gov't to recognize a marriage? No.
Or if they said"Gay marriage licenses will give the impression that society considers legal recognition of gay marriage as beneficial as legal recognition of traditional marriage".
Would that be a reason for our gov't to recognize a marriage? No.
Or if they said "I believe, and society believes that consenting to a license for two men in a relationship is damaging to families"
Would that be a reason for our gov't to recognize a marriage? No.
If you cannot tell the difference between offering reasons for the gov't to recognize marriage (hint:this would be the gov't recognizing straight marriage), then I cannot respond by showing you how gay marriages would provide the same reason.
Pretend you are a citizen. And you had reasons to oppose gay marriage licenses.
If some guy said he could use any reason you provided for your beliefs as an argument FOR gay marriage licenses and you gave him five of your reasons and he failed to use any of them to support gay marriage licenses then you would be justified thinking him a dunce.