Get in back of the bus gender neutrals, we're progressing to neurodiverse

IDIOCRACY

Diamond Member
Nov 16, 2017
2,594
2,571
1,938
Ha ha, I just saw this word for the first time. The Democrats are using it to describe Walz son, because he cried while his dad accepted Kamala's appointment.

Neurodiversity is a framework that recognizes the unique ways people's brains process information and function. It's based on the idea that everyone's brain develops similarly, but no two brains function the same.

Do you think the liberals way of applying new labels and definitions to nature is healthy?
 
Are republicans mocking a kid with learning disabilities?

Do you really think that helps you in an election?
It would certainly be appropriate to point out that Walz and the other democrats would surely have demanded this child be aborted if it had been born to someone else. Someone, say, like Sarah Palin.
 
Man, woman, boy girl, retard, crazy, straight, bi, fag.

Things were so much easier when we just used plain and simple terminology to describe things just as they are instead of having dozens of groups or sub groups and even sub sub groups. We'd have said he was retarded and everyone would have just gone their way understanding he has developmental problems and not psychological problems.

Being a child of the 80s I can say that word never would have flown then. It was too specific and too complicated of a meaning.

Have developmental problems? Retard.

Have psychological problems? Crazy.

Then all of society knows what kind of issue they had. 99% of all people don't care or need to know someone elses exact problems in detail using one of dozens and dozens of words that all boil down to the same thing.

99.9999999999% of peope wants to know why there is a stop sign at a specific spot in the road, they just want to know if they should stop so a simple sign that says "stop" is all they need, they don't want an explanation. So if someone is retarded then just say retarded so 99.999999999% of people can just keep on going, because they don't care how someone is retarded, they just want to know if they are retarded
 
It would certainly be appropriate to point out that Walz and the other democrats would surely have demanded this child be aborted if it had been born to someone else. Someone, say, like Sarah Palin.

It was great seeing Walz bring his son front and center. You could see how proud he is of his son

Trump would have hid him and denied he exists

Disabled people make Trump uncomfortable
 
It was great seeing Walz bring his son front and center. You could see how proud he is of his son

Trump would have hid him and denied he exists

Disabled people make Trump uncomfortable
So it is only OTHER peoplel's chldren Walz wants to kill. His own is okay. If Trump would have hidden the child, he would certainly be alive. Walz' son is exactly the kind of person democrats want to kill in the womb and now is too late to deny it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top