And none of them say it must be shown it was uttered with malice.
As everyone can see for themselves.
You messed up, and i don't have to give any more attention to your error and red herring.
Moving the goal posts. You and I have spent the last several posts talking about what is required for defamation, and now you are bringing malice into it. I posted what Cornell law website says is required for defamation, those are not my words, it’s the word of the law.
Earlier I said that malice was required, when speaking with someone else, but I have since posted what the law states about it, and it’s that, that you and I have been talking about.