Harris accepts CNN debate invitation for October 23

[konradv]

I would LOVE to see an unscripted question and answer for both Trump and Harris. She doesn’t do that for a reason. That reason is the same that Biden doesn’t do them. Biden has an excuse as he is demented, but Harris is just plain ignorant.

The debate was unscripted and Trump lost bigly! We know because, like all sore losers, he blamed the refs.

#VOTEHARRIS

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Then she needs to stay away from JD Vance!

#VOTEHARRIS

Even Bill won't fuck that couch, and he'll fuck anything.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

I’d put Harris’ speeches up against anything Trump has to offer.

#VOTEKAMALA

Did you know she grew up as a middle-class kid?

DURR

 

[Slade3200]

That bill did nothing to secure the border, Slade. Harris saying she'll sign into law a bill that was ALWAYS DOA in Congress means nothing! The Democrats knew all along that bill wasn't going to pass...it was always political theater that allowed them to claim they wanted to fix the border but Trump "killed" that! The truth is that they always HAD the authority to fix the border and could have done so with ZERO yes votes by the GOP!

Conservative senator Langford would disagree with you. It injected funding for border agents and technology. That would help security, wouldn’t it?

 

[Slade3200]

[QUOTE="Delldude, post: 35391814, member: 52549”]
You have read the bill?
[/QUOTE]
Yes, have you?

 

[konradv]

Did you know she grew up as a middle-class kid?

Relevance?

#DISTRACTION

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Conservative senator Langford would disagree with you. It injected funding for border agents and technology. That would help security, wouldn’t it?

When the border agents are told to rush the illegal aliens in and feed them lunch,
instead of catch them and push them back into Mexico, why is more money for more agents a solution for the insecure border?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Relevance?

#DISTRACTION

You're talking about her speeches.

#DURR

 

[Slade3200]

When the border agents are told to rush the illegal aliens in and feed them lunch,
instead of catch them and push them back into Mexico, why is more money for more agents a solution for the insecure border?

Because taking people into custody is better than people freely roaming o to our country unaccounted for. Do you agree?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Because taking people into custody is better than people freely roaming o to our country unaccounted for. Do you agree?

Taking people into custody?
Or giving them bus and plane tickets into the interior?

I thought you wanted border security?
That would require catching them, taking photos, prints and DNA and then
pushing them back into Mexico.

 

[Slade3200]

Taking people into custody?
Or giving them bus and plane tickets into the interior?

I thought you wanted border security?
That would require catching them, taking photos, prints and DNA and then
pushing them back into Mexico.

Taking them into custody. If they are determined to have a legit asylum claim then bussing them somewhere makes sense. If not they can be deported.

And yes the proposed bill helped with all this. But Trump and some of the GOP didn’t want to give the Dems a win in an election year so they killed. Politics over country. Pathetic

 

[Delldude]

Probably not a good idea though to lend credibility to a bogus network that had to pay $780 million for lying to it's viewers.

But it's OK when ABC rigs a debate?

 

[Man With A Plan]

Conservative senator Langford would disagree with you. It injected funding for border agents and technology. That would help security, wouldn’t it?

The funding for more agents wasn't to secure the border...it was to process illegals faster. You know what that does? It makes the problem WORSE! We can't handle the numbers we have now but that bill would have pushed illegals through the process faster! That bill was never about securing the border...it was about fixing the massive backlog of illegals that the Biden/Harris Administration's policies created!

 

[konradv]

You're talking about her speeches.

#DURR

No I wasn’t. You seem to be confused!

#GETSOMESLEEP

 

[Man With A Plan]

Taking them into custody. If they are determined to have a legit asylum claim then bussing them somewhere makes sense. If not they can be deported.

And yes the proposed bill helped with all this. But Trump and some of the GOP didn’t want to give the Dems a win in an election year so they killed. Politics over country. Pathetic

Come on Slade...that "bill" was never about fixing the border...it was ALWAYS about diverting attention from the god awful mess that Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have created with their open border policy and give them a talking point when the border was brought up. The votes were never there and everyone involved knew they weren't there!
Which brings us right back to the REAL question! Why didn't Joe Biden and Kamala Harris use Executive Orders to secure the border because they've ALWAYS had that ability!

 

[Slade3200]

The funding for more agents wasn't to secure the border...it was to process illegals faster. You know what that does? It makes the problem WORSE! We can't handle the numbers we have now but that bill would have pushed illegals through the process faster! That bill was never about securing the border...it was about fixing the massive backlog of illegals that the Biden/Harris Administration's policies created!

Senator Langford would disagree with you and he coauthored it. You’re just repeating right wing media spin. Try looking at the actual bill. Here….

This bill addresses issues regarding immigration and border security, including by imposing limits to asylum eligibility.

For example, the bill

requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to resume activities to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border;

provides statutory authorization for Operation Stonegarden, which provides grants to law enforcement agencies for certain border security operations;

prohibits DHS from processing the entry of non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) arriving between ports of entry;

limits asylum eligibility to non-U.S. nationals who arrive in the United States at a port of entry;

authorizes the removal of a non-U.S. national to a country other than that individual's country of nationality or last lawful habitual residence, whereas currently this type of removal may only be to a country that has an agreement with the United States for such removal;

expands the types of crimes that may make an individual ineligible for asylum, such as a conviction for driving while intoxicated causing another person's serious bodily injury or death;

authorizes DHS to suspend the introduction of certain non-U.S. nationals at an international border if DHS determines that the suspension is necessary to achieve operational control of that border;

prohibits states from imposing licensing requirements on immigration detention facilities used to detain minors;

authorizes immigration officers to permit an unaccompanied alien child to withdraw their application for admission into the United States even if the child is unable to make an independent decision to withdraw the application;

imposes additional penalties for overstaying a visa; and

requires DHS to create an electronic employment eligibility confirmation system modeled after the E-Verify system and requires all employers to use the system.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Taking them into custody. If they are determined to have a legit asylum claim then bussing them somewhere makes sense. If not they can be deported.

And yes the proposed bill helped with all this. But Trump and some of the GOP didn’t want to give the Dems a win in an election year so they killed. Politics over country. Pathetic

Giving Biden more money to rush more illegal aliens with fake asylum claims into the country even faster was a bad idea.

But Trump and some of the GOP didn’t want to give the Dems a win in an election year

Why would the Republicans help Biden make things worse and allow him to claim
he fixed the border, 6 months before the election?

He and the border Czar fucked it up, they can run on their fuck up.

 

[Billo_Really]

challenging Trump to another showdown​

trump will not accept, of course.

Even he has the minimal intelligence required not to willing show up for a second ass-whipping.

Trump got raped in that first debate.

 

[dudmuck]

But it's OK when ABC rigs a debate?

 

[hadit]

Nobody won that first debate.

Bull. That debate was the seminal event that caused Quid Pro Joe to drop out of the race, and having your opponent drop out after a debate is a very clear sign that you won. Here's the question for you. If, as you claim (now), no one won the debate or Quid Pro had won, would Quid Pro Joe have dropped out? I think we all know that answer.

TRUMP! won, clearly.