Harris accepts CNN debate invitation for October 23

You know what the problem with ALL of that is, Slade? It relies on the Mayorkas DHS to implement all of those things...the same little lying worm that allowed the border crisis to happen in the first place! Langford was a gullible fool. Trusting the Biden DHS and Mayorkas to do the right thing is like putting Jeffrey Epstein in charge of an exploited women's center!
Wrong again... You obviously didn't read what I put right in front of you.... The Bill prohibits DHS from processing illegals arriving between ports and requires them to close the border when triggered. There are many other measures in the bill that you obviously didn't read... How about you go back and take 1 minute to scan the highlights that I posted so you can at least act like you know what you're talking about.
 
There's no way for the dems to win on this issue. The reason WE HAVE AMNESTY provisions is a 1951 treaty that requires us to not send back people entering the US without a right of entry and claiming asylum, despite the vast majority not being eligible.
 
Actually all that first debate proved is that ABC has ZERO integrity!
That...and whenever Kamala Harris is asked a tough question...you're going to get an answer that doesn't address the question!
She did that with the first question as she jumped into her opening statement. But besides that which tough question did she dodge?
 
She did that with the first question as she jumped into her opening statement. But besides that which tough question did she dodge?
oh, well she dodged on immigration to tag Donnie Dementia by commenting on his small "crowd" size

And she did it with perfect finesse. lol
 
oh, well she dodged on immigration to tag Donnie Dementia by commenting on his small "crowd" size

And she did it with perfect finesse. lol
Haha, that was well executed.. but she did answer by saying she would sign that bipartisan bill into law
 
LOL Yup. More Dems voted against this bullshit bill than Repubs voted for it.
No shit. Dems don’t usually support tough border measures but the bill has the backing from the president and enough Dems to get through with GOP support. So an actual chance to do something… but Trump and his puppets squashed it. True colors shown
 
The bill was better than the current situation
No it was actually much worse in that it codified some really shitty policies
but all you GOP turds that are pretending to be against it just didn’t want to see things get better under Biden in an election year. Pathetic
LOL So Booker and the other DEms voted against it because he wanted to hurt Biden. Interesting theory.
 
No shit. Dems don’t usually support tough border measures but the bill has the backing from the president and enough Dems to get through with GOP support. So an actual chance to do something… but Trump and his puppets squashed it. True colors shown
They supported it for two reasons! The first is that it WASN'T a tough border measure...it would have made it easier for Democrats to keep flooding the country with illegals! The second is that they knew it never had a snowball's chance in Hell of ever being passed and was nothing more than a talking point for the Biden Administration to excuse their awful record on the border by claiming the GOP kept them from fixing the border!
 
That’s a pretty short sighted interpretation.

Dems staying with their principles, GOP going against their principles to pay fealty to Trump…. That would be more accurate
THey should. Because Trump is a God, right? LOL The bullshit you swallow and regurgitate for your party is a hoot.
 
The bill actually put more limits on asylum claims. You might know that if you actually read the bill.

Here….

This bill addresses issues regarding immigration and border security, including by imposing limits to asylum eligibility.

For example, the bill

requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to resume activities to construct a wall along the U.S.-Mexico border;

provides statutory authorization for Operation Stonegarden, which provides grants to law enforcement agencies for certain border security operations;

prohibits DHS from processing the entry of non-U.S. nationals (aliens under federal law) arriving between ports of entry;

limits asylum eligibility to non-U.S. nationals who arrive in the United States at a port of entry;

authorizes the removal of a non-U.S. national to a country other than that individual's country of nationality or last lawful habitual residence, whereas currently this type of removal may only be to a country that has an agreement with the United States for such removal;

expands the types of crimes that may make an individual ineligible for asylum, such as a conviction for driving while intoxicated causing another person's serious bodily injury or death;

authorizes DHS to suspend the introduction of certain non-U.S. nationals at an international border if DHS determines that the suspension is necessary to achieve operational control of that border;

prohibits states from imposing licensing requirements on immigration detention facilities used to detain minors;

authorizes immigration officers to permit an unaccompanied alien child to withdraw their application for admission into the United States even if the child is unable to make an independent decision to withdraw the application;

imposes additional penalties for overstaying a visa; and

requires DHS to create an electronic employment eligibility confirmation system modeled after the E-Verify system and requires all employers to use the system.

Biden wasn't even pretending to attempt to secure the border with the money and power he had, why would anyone trust he would do so with even more money?
 
Can’t have it both ways. If it makes things worse then it isn’t a fix. If it would be a fix then you’re blocking something that’s good for the country for political purposes… which is what happened

Can’t have it both ways. If it makes things worse then it isn’t a fix.

It would make things worse. It isn't a fix.
He'd point and say, "If it still isn't working, well the Republicans voted for it too"

He wanted a band aid, that wouldn't fix things, for political purposes.
 

Forum List

Back
Top