Homosexuals say they didn't identify as homosexual until after sexually molested

Oh honey, I haven't made a mistake, bless you.

There are always pro-homos around to *debunk* studies... thank goodness the CDC, the APA, Guttmacher's, PP and the universities are so thoroughly saturated with "non-partisan" homosexuals, so they can do that!

Wow. You live in some sort of irrational world where there is a conspiracy involved with anything that doesn't fit with your religious belief system and cultural tradional values. There is a cabal of homosexuals that attempt to undermine studies regarding the reasons behind their orientation just so they can be seen as normal or as victims, right? Or the cabal of climate scientists that suck from the government teat through NSF grants by falsely claiming that global warming is a threat. Or the other group of scientists who do the same thing but for evolution or the Big Bang. Right?

All these people are out to get you and yours. You are always under threat. The socialists, the gays, the illegal immigrants, the blacks, the climate scientists, the evolutionists, the muslims, the atheists are all coming to recruit you by force, to take you children and brainwash them, to steal your hard-earned money, to take your property, and send you off to a re-education camp where you will forsake Jesus but will still be executed and after you die you'll see, finally, that all of it was just Satan's doing. That's the kind of world you live in, isn't it?



And what does any of this have to do with my religious system? Does your religious system approve of the rape of 13 year old boys and an increase of HIV infection among them? Where have I mentioned religion in this thread?

Yes, I disapprove of a lifestyle that allows the rape of young boys by older HIV infected men. I take it you do not. Got it.
 
Last edited:
except as the study shows :

I'm less than convinced by the results of a single study.
The numbers can easily be twisted to prove pretty much anything.
We've seen it before and we'll see it again.
 
I'll bet you a dollar that 13 and 14 year old boys experiment with each other as well as with any willing girls they know, and that link will NOT be forthcoming.
:popcorn:

I can't comment on boys getting their junk together but I know I did with a couple of girls from the age of 11, the age I had my first snog and feel.
I never had any interest in other lads but I'm pretty sure the gay one's had a fiddle or few on the quiet; without waiting to be raped by an adult.

Nature is tough to beat, regardless of sexuality.

except as the study shows many of those who consider themselves homosexual DiD NOT CONSIDER THAT until they have been "introduced" to the practice.
By the older men.
Pederasty is as old as humanity is - it was not deemed a something illegal in the ancient times, for example.
That was is and always will be the introduction to the "trade" by older men.
those 13-14-15 year olds labeled as yong men having sex with men and contracting the STDs are most likely the child prostitution rings - not the school peers partying.

that is the main difference. you don't have to be introduced to heterosexual sex while a teenager, it's natural.
But a lot of young boys are being forced to homosexual relationships - and not by peers - by the older ones - and that what the study and statistics from that study have proven.

read the freaking study, not the article about it :rolleyes:

Of course, in ancient times, if you wanted a boy-toy, you just bought one :rolleyes:
 
I'll bet you a dollar that 13 and 14 year old boys experiment with each other as well as with any willing girls they know, and that link will NOT be forthcoming.
:popcorn:

I can't comment on boys getting their junk together but I know I did with a couple of girls from the age of 11, the age I had my first snog and feel.
I never had any interest in other lads but I'm pretty sure the gay one's had a fiddle or few on the quiet; without waiting to be raped by an adult.

Nature is tough to beat, regardless of sexuality.

except as the study shows many of those who consider themselves homosexual DiD NOT CONSIDER THAT until they have been "introduced" to the practice.
By the older men.
Pederasty is as old as humanity is - it was not deemed a something illegal in the ancient times, for example.
That was is and always will be the introduction to the "trade" by older men.
those 13-14-15 year olds labeled as yong men having sex with men and contracting the STDs are most likely the child prostitution rings - not the school peers partying.

that is the main difference. you don't have to be introduced to heterosexual sex while a teenager, it's natural.
But a lot of young boys are being forced to homosexual relationships - and not by peers - by the older ones - and that what the study and statistics from that study have proven.

read the freaking study, not the article about it :rolleyes:

The article points out the flaws in the study. Why do you want us to ignore that?
 
There has always been a problem with certain men who recruit boys.

However, the critical flaws in the study cannot be ignored.

We cannot pretend that the heterosexual adults have a tremendous impact on hurting young girls.
 
The study isn't about heterosexual adults hurting young girls.

Start a different thread.
 
I can't comment on boys getting their junk together but I know I did with a couple of girls from the age of 11, the age I had my first snog and feel.
I never had any interest in other lads but I'm pretty sure the gay one's had a fiddle or few on the quiet; without waiting to be raped by an adult.

Nature is tough to beat, regardless of sexuality.

except as the study shows many of those who consider themselves homosexual DiD NOT CONSIDER THAT until they have been "introduced" to the practice.
By the older men.
Pederasty is as old as humanity is - it was not deemed a something illegal in the ancient times, for example.
That was is and always will be the introduction to the "trade" by older men.
those 13-14-15 year olds labeled as yong men having sex with men and contracting the STDs are most likely the child prostitution rings - not the school peers partying.

that is the main difference. you don't have to be introduced to heterosexual sex while a teenager, it's natural.
But a lot of young boys are being forced to homosexual relationships - and not by peers - by the older ones - and that what the study and statistics from that study have proven.

read the freaking study, not the article about it :rolleyes:

The article points out the flaws in the study. Why do you want us to ignore that?

Read the study, troll.
 
The study isn't about heterosexual adults hurting young girls.

Start a different thread.

It is inherent in the OP, particularly when the evidence if flawed and you are pursuing an unbalanced and obsessive interest in same sex attractions.

Now, please don't troll your own thread.
 
except as the study shows many of those who consider themselves homosexual DiD NOT CONSIDER THAT until they have been "introduced" to the practice.
By the older men.
Pederasty is as old as humanity is - it was not deemed a something illegal in the ancient times, for example.
That was is and always will be the introduction to the "trade" by older men.
those 13-14-15 year olds labeled as yong men having sex with men and contracting the STDs are most likely the child prostitution rings - not the school peers partying.

that is the main difference. you don't have to be introduced to heterosexual sex while a teenager, it's natural.
But a lot of young boys are being forced to homosexual relationships - and not by peers - by the older ones - and that what the study and statistics from that study have proven.

read the freaking study, not the article about it :rolleyes:

The article points out the flaws in the study. Why do you want us to ignore that?

Read the study, troll.

You are trolling your own thread, Ms. Obsessive.

All adults who prey on children, homosexuals and heterosexuals, must be captured and locked away forever.
 
It's hard to capture the predators if you refuse to acknowledge the existence of the victims.
 
No, you don't. Not when you refer to them as "men having sex with men" and lump them into groups with men who are of the age of consent.

Not when you do your desperate best to hide the fact that homosexuals are preying upon underaged boys, and not just preying upon them, but infecting them with HIV, by pretending it's indicative of an epidemic of hetero abuse of young girls.

I mean, not only is that crazy, but it's obviously an attempt to hide the problem.

So much for being about the *science* of health, eh?
 
No, you don't. Not when you refer to them as "men having sex with men" and lump them into groups with men who are of the age of consent.

Not when you do your desperate best to hide the fact that homosexuals are preying upon underaged boys, and not just preying upon them, but infecting them with HIV, by pretending it's indicative of an epidemic of hetero abuse of young girls.

I mean, not only is that crazy, but it's obviously an attempt to hide the problem.

So much for being about the *science* of health, eh?

Does the CDC use those age groupings for other studies? Do they use them for non-sexual diseases?

If they do not, then I can see you having a point.
 
The study isn't about heterosexual adults hurting young girls.

Start a different thread.

Of course it isn't, that wouldn't promote your anti-homosexual agenda :eusa_whistle:
 
No, you don't. Not when you refer to them as "men having sex with men" and lump them into groups with men who are of the age of consent.

Not when you do your desperate best to hide the fact that homosexuals are preying upon underaged boys, and not just preying upon them, but infecting them with HIV, by pretending it's indicative of an epidemic of hetero abuse of young girls.

I mean, not only is that crazy, but it's obviously an attempt to hide the problem.

So much for being about the *science* of health, eh?

"I" don't refer to them that way at all.

Not a person here denies that grown men and women, heterosexuals and homosexuals, prey on children.

Heteros, yes, like, homosexuals, infect boys and girls with STDs.

What is your point?
 
No, you don't. Not when you refer to them as "men having sex with men" and lump them into groups with men who are of the age of consent.

Not when you do your desperate best to hide the fact that homosexuals are preying upon underaged boys, and not just preying upon them, but infecting them with HIV, by pretending it's indicative of an epidemic of hetero abuse of young girls.

I mean, not only is that crazy, but it's obviously an attempt to hide the problem.

So much for being about the *science* of health, eh?

"I" don't refer to them that way at all.

Not a person here denies that grown men and women, heterosexuals and homosexuals, prey on children.

Heteros, yes, like, homosexuals, infect boys and girls with STDs.

What is your point?

My point is that the HIV infection rate of 13 year old boys is increasing, via homosexual sex, and the homo lobby is referring to the victims as "men having sex with men" and ignoring the fact that this particular group is being infected at a higher rate than 13 year old girls.

Yet still, you insist on pretending the two issues are one and the same.

They aren't.
 
They are referring to them as "men having sex with men" and failing to address it as a second issue. They maintain that it's all about *education* but fail to address the fact that 13 year olds are being victimized and infected...that's not a matter of education, it's a matter of increased abuse of young boys by homosexuals.

I don't think that's the CDC's responsibility for one, they collect data and their primary concern is public health which is focused on the huge number is in the 15-19 and 20-24 age range. That is a matter of education.

In terms of 13-14 yr olds, a much younger group - you don't know if they are or are not being victimized. Kids do become sexually active at that age (look at teen pregnancy) and it's not necessarily abuse by an adult though it can be. Are there procedures in place to investigate this, whether it's underage boys or girls?

Education is still the most important tool to prevention.

The other thing is this - in order to investigate something as a crime, the victim has to be willing to report it. So how much of this very small group is the result of molestation and how much is not is really not well reseached (or is it?).

How can a five year old girl report a crime? How can a five year old boy report a crime?

By taking the same approach you do to any sexual crime against a child - they may not report it, but parents might notice something. If a child comes up with HIV - then someone in the medical field, or associate case workers might question them. If a child presents with HIV, that should galvanize some action.
 
Hey 911 I just got raped? My uncle just fudge packed me? My cousin just told me to lie there and hold "the cucumber" ?

Come on here. We know this shit is going on.

Woah. No one is saying it does not go on. Everyone knows sex crimes against children occur and because it's most often family members - it probably grossly under reported. I don't think anyone is denying that.
 

Forum List

Back
Top