Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
That is what they're saying.
My point is, based on WHAT??? They're saying that in order to HIDE the fact that they are victims.
There was a survey done that the CDC looked at, as well as previous studies supposedly.
HIV/STD Risks in Young Men Who Have Sex with Men Who Do Not Disclose Their Sexual Orientation --- Six U.S. Cities, 1994--2000
That this is an attempt to hide anyone as victims is speculation that I don't agree with. I'll admit it might be a motivation for some, but I find it hard to credit the idea that the entirety, or even the majority, of the CDC is out to lower age limits or hide underage victims of sexual abuse, homosexual or heterosexual.
How odd then that all their studies on the increased HIV infection rate of underaged boys seeks to paint the boys as consenting sexual partners....and also identifies them as "homosexual" when they admit they don't identify themselves as homosexual.
Interesting, no?
They aren't homosexual, they were forced into homosexual relationships when they were UNDERAGE.
Do they not identify themselves as homosexual, or do they not identify themselves as homosexual publicly?
I think the point was that, at least in the survey, they were willing to identify as homosexual anonymously, but many were unwilling to do so publicly.
Whether they are painted as consenting sexual partners or not, I can't say. I haven't seen anything one way or the other. I haven't looked in depth, though, so I'm not going to just deny it.