Montrovant
Fuzzy bears!
What is with people and their inability to conceptualize that proving a negative is a logical fallacy...the fact that it has never been DIS-proved that homosexuality is genetic is not proof that it IS genetic.
The article does not contradict the point that homosexuality is caused by sexual abuse. It simply shows that a lot of homosexuals, more than the rest of the population, have been sexually abused...and of those, a disproportionate number are homosexuals, and of THOSE, a disproportionate portion claim they didn't know they were homosexual until AFTER the abuse.
I know what the article and the study show. I'm not interested in what it DOESN'T show. That would be a different discussion.
You are the one who claimed irrefutable evidence that homosexuality is not genetic.
The article author says clearly that the study should not be assumed to show causation.