so, instead of outright lying and claiming it is, why dont they work with them to close a suspected loop hole?so basically what you are saying is the OP is in FACT wrong
Yes....and no.
To state unequivocally there is a full out "war on contraception" I'd have to see evidence of a movement to include contraception services in State conscience provisions. I don't have that information, nor even if I did do I have evidence the House GOP is working in collusion with them.
BUT....what they state as a possible outcome is indeed possible.
So are a lot of other non-reproductive worst case scenarios. Personally I see it as a back door way to shelter the issuers from the costs of end of life care by allowing those provisions to be exempted as a matter of "conscience". That's actually worse in my opinion.
partisan political CRAP
It's a special interest legal advocacy group, you expected no hyperbole?
That said, their analysis of the law itself is correct IMO. It is possible.
Do you honestly think the GOP House will work with this group? That's like saying the Dem House would seriously entertain suggestions from the Cato Institute.
They're trying to get attention drawn to a loophole that concerns them in a different way. That's their job, just like every other advocacy group's job. Of course they're going to be alarmist about it. Fear sells more than sex, I think.
But that doesn't make them totally wrong.