How JD Vance emerged as the chief saboteur of the transatlantic alliance

C_Clayton_Jones

Diamond Member
Joined
Apr 28, 2011
Messages
79,643
Reaction score
41,024
Points
2,605
Location
In a Republic, actually
'JD Vance was supposed to be the inconsequential vice-president.

But his starring role in Friday’s blowup between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy – where he played a cross between Trump’s bulldog and tech bro Iago – may mark the moment that the postwar alliance between Europe and America finally collapsed.

Trump and Vance teamed up to goad Zelenskyy into a feud in the Oval Office. But it was Vance that snaked his way in first, riling up the Ukrainian president by telling him that he was leading “propaganda tours” of the destruction wrought by Russia’s invasion.
[…]
There is a thing in Washington that many people understand but that few will say: that the Trump administration was looking for a pretext to ruin its relationship with Ukraine, and that the canned messaging that followed the Oval Office feels oddly coordinated and premeditated.'


Attacking an ally and siding with the war criminal Putin is obviously Vance pandering to the Trump Cult who will need a new Cult Leader come 2028.
 
The Radical Left and their greedy little grifter Zelensky have chosen war over peace.

zelenskykjffjdjdgd.webp

zalenskyhuyydydyd.webp
 
'JD Vance was supposed to be the inconsequential vice-president.

But his starring role in Friday’s blowup between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy – where he played a cross between Trump’s bulldog and tech bro Iago – may mark the moment that the postwar alliance between Europe and America finally collapsed.

Trump and Vance teamed up to goad Zelenskyy into a feud in the Oval Office. But it was Vance that snaked his way in first, riling up the Ukrainian president by telling him that he was leading “propaganda tours” of the destruction wrought by Russia’s invasion.
[…]
There is a thing in Washington that many people understand but that few will say: that the Trump administration was looking for a pretext to ruin its relationship with Ukraine, and that the canned messaging that followed the Oval Office feels oddly coordinated and premeditated.'


Attacking an ally and siding with the war criminal Putin is obviously Vance pandering to the Trump Cult who will need a new Cult Leader come 2028.
1740842884035.webp
 
'JD Vance was supposed to be the inconsequential vice-president.

But his starring role in Friday’s blowup between Donald Trump and Volodymyr Zelenskyy – where he played a cross between Trump’s bulldog and tech bro Iago – may mark the moment that the postwar alliance between Europe and America finally collapsed.

Trump and Vance teamed up to goad Zelenskyy into a feud in the Oval Office. But it was Vance that snaked his way in first, riling up the Ukrainian president by telling him that he was leading “propaganda tours” of the destruction wrought by Russia’s invasion.
[…]
There is a thing in Washington that many people understand but that few will say: that the Trump administration was looking for a pretext to ruin its relationship with Ukraine, and that the canned messaging that followed the Oval Office feels oddly coordinated and premeditated.'


Attacking an ally and siding with the war criminal Putin is obviously Vance pandering to the Trump Cult who will need a new Cult Leader come 2028.

Looked like a preplanned set up to me.

Trump was ready to finish and Vance chimed in with I have one more thing

His lecturing on what diplomacy was and whining you never thanked us today was condescending and triggered Trump
 
Looked like a preplanned set up to me.

Trump was ready to finish and Vance chimed in with I have one more thing

His lecturing on what diplomacy was and whining you never thanked us today was condescending and triggered Trump
Looks like the standard Progressive Socialist marching orders that you spewed to me. It's so easy now to recognize this.
 
JD showed he will be the same strong president that Trump is - he won’t stand for disrespect and hostility from a foreign leader to which America gave $160 billion and saved them from destruction.
 
P.S. This thread is yet another example as to how libs ALWAYS defend the wrong people. Illegals over Americans, Islamic terrorists over Jews, violent criminals over law-abiders. And now we add this to the list.
 
Last edited:
None of the others called Putin a Genius for invading
None took sides with Putin over US intelligence
None voted with Putin at the UN over our Allies
None surrendered to Putin
The US warmongers wanted Russia to invade Ukraine. We started the instability back in 2014 when we installed a puppet regime to antagonize Russia and persecute ethnic Russians in Ukraine.

It’s laughable you take the side of “US intelligence”, these are the same liars who lied to us about WMD in Iraq.
 
P.S. This thread is yet another example as to how libs ALWAYS defend the wrong people. Illegals over Americans, Islamic terrorists over Jews, violent criminals over law-a ideas. And now we add this to the list.
Liberals are defending a country that is being invading by a tyrant

Conservatives are lining up to defend the tyrant
 
Back
Top Bottom