Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Him being guilty is a foregone conclusion....
Screw due process.
All the details are in, and the internet contains all the factoids one ever needs ta know to make conclooshuns in 72 hours flat.
We live in a miraculous age/
Ohhh.... I just remembered something else. Since he did renounce his citizenship, he has no Constitutional rights. We are not legally obligated to grant him due process under the law.
Well, that would be true regarding his citizenship, but remember foreigners in foreign countries have Constitutional rights anyway so there's no difference.
Ohhh.... I just remembered something else. Since he did renounce his citizenship, he has no Constitutional rights. We are not legally obligated to grant him due process under the law.
Well, that would be true regarding his citizenship, but remember foreigners in foreign countries have Constitutional rights anyway so there's no difference.
Without claiming citizenship anywhere else, he has none of protections of any country anywhere on the planet. So he can't even be called a foreigner.
Well, that would be true regarding his citizenship, but remember foreigners in foreign countries have Constitutional rights anyway so there's no difference.
Without claiming citizenship anywhere else, he has none of protections of any country anywhere on the planet. So he can't even be called a foreigner.
You know I'm just mocking the left, right Templar?
All while Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi sits in a Mexican jail being tortured and beaten.
And so do many other Americans, for the same crime, going back decades.
Many other Americans are in prisons across the globe for various crimes, real or imagined, some of them soldiers.
You should explain why your selective outrage suddenly made a politically convenient appearance here.
So you're saying Tahmooressi committed a crime? Well yeah according to you he did. It has been explained to you over and over again that he made a wrong turn and was prevented from returning due to a lack of proper signage.
Actually, it isn't outrage. It's more of... "you're a hypocrite" than anything else. Bergdahl has deserted his country, renounced his citizenship, and possibly aided the enemy, now he's worth more attention and resources than a Marine. So... perhaps it is a little bit of outrage after all.
Ahh yes. Renouncing citizenship does not absolve him of the crimes he committed against the US. But even still, when he is tried, he won't have his constitutional rights. In effect, he is stateless. He lacks the protection of any government. Therefore, he has no rights anywhere.
So, if we wanted to, we could have captured him and executed him on the spot, not only for his desertion, but treason.
I can almost feel IQ points dripping away just by reading Templar's posts.Ahh yes. Renouncing citizenship does not absolve him of the crimes he committed against the US. But even still, when he is tried, he won't have his constitutional rights. In effect, he is stateless. He lacks the protection of any government. Therefore, he has no rights anywhere.
So, if we wanted to, we could have captured him and executed him on the spot, not only for his desertion, but treason.
Ah, so you're back to claiming that prisoners can be summarily executed without any judicial procedure...
lolol
And so do many other Americans, for the same crime, going back decades.
Many other Americans are in prisons across the globe for various crimes, real or imagined, some of them soldiers.
You should explain why your selective outrage suddenly made a politically convenient appearance here.
So you're saying Tahmooressi committed a crime? Well yeah according to you he did. It has been explained to you over and over again that he made a wrong turn and was prevented from returning due to a lack of proper signage.
Actually, it isn't outrage. It's more of... "you're a hypocrite" than anything else. Bergdahl has deserted his country, renounced his citizenship, and possibly aided the enemy, now he's worth more attention and resources than a Marine. So... perhaps it is a little bit of outrage after all.
You're sure that Tahmooressi is innocent and sure that Bergdahl is guilty. That is what makes you a hypocrite.
lol, if Obama had gotten the guy out of Mexico instead of getting Bergdahl the RWnuts would be complaining about that.
Ahh yes. Renouncing citizenship does not absolve him of the crimes he committed against the US. But even still, when he is tried, he won't have his constitutional rights. In effect, he is stateless. He lacks the protection of any government. Therefore, he has no rights anywhere.
So, if we wanted to, we could have captured him and executed him on the spot, not only for his desertion, but treason.
Ah, so you're back to claiming that prisoners can be summarily executed without any judicial procedure...
lolol
I can almost feel IQ points dripping away just by reading Templar's posts.Ahh yes. Renouncing citizenship does not absolve him of the crimes he committed against the US. But even still, when he is tried, he won't have his constitutional rights. In effect, he is stateless. He lacks the protection of any government. Therefore, he has no rights anywhere.
So, if we wanted to, we could have captured him and executed him on the spot, not only for his desertion, but treason.
Ah, so you're back to claiming that prisoners can be summarily executed without any judicial procedure...
lolol
Must refrain.
Actually, his statements that he is being mistreated are inconsistent. We do know however that he had a May 28 court date, at which he fired his attorney, so any hearing on his possible innocence is delayed. Further, there was no evidence of mistreatment at the hearing. He now blames the US govt for lising English speaking Mexican attorneys for his hiring of the one he fired.
We don't know what steps the DOS has taken. So, there's a logical fallacy to your OP. But, we know his arrest is not uncommon as Americans tend to carry weapons into Mexico ... and get arrested.
US Marine Held in Mexico Prison for Guns: The Case of Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi - Latin America news - Boston.com
Actually, his statements that he is being mistreated are inconsistent. We do know however that he had a May 28 court date, at which he fired his attorney, so any hearing on his possible innocence is delayed. Further, there was no evidence of mistreatment at the hearing. He now blames the US govt for lising English speaking Mexican attorneys for his hiring of the one he fired.
We don't know what steps the DOS has taken. So, there's a logical fallacy to your OP. But, we know his arrest is not uncommon as Americans tend to carry weapons into Mexico ... and get arrested.
US Marine Held in Mexico Prison for Guns: The Case of Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi - Latin America news - Boston.com
So you're saying Tahmooressi committed a crime? Well yeah according to you he did.
It has been explained to you over and over again that he made a wrong turn and was prevented from returning due to a lack of proper signage.
Actually, it isn't outrage. It's more of... "you're a hypocrite" than anything else. Bergdahl has deserted his country, renounced his citizenship, and possibly aided the enemy, now he's worth more attention and resources than a Marine. So... perhaps it is a little bit of outrage after all.
Explain to us, mr. smartee pants, what's the process for renouncing US citizenship?Ahh yes. Renouncing citizenship does not absolve him of the crimes he committed against the US. But even still, when he is tried, he won't have his constitutional rights. In effect, he is stateless. He lacks the protection of any government. Therefore, he has no rights anywhere.
So, if we wanted to, we could have captured him and executed him on the spot, not only for his desertion, but treason.
