If Harris wins the debate on creepy Disney or improves her odds, there won't be another debate, if she loses, there will

[shockedcanadian]

Almost guaranteed, the Dems are a political party not a policy party. This is why Trump is a sucker for accepting the debate on ABC and not forcing her on to go onto Fox as well.

He is being played almost certainly which is why they added the additions of notes and sitting down etc, it was to get Trump to the debate by appearing to capitulate. This took the focus off of "three debates" which Trump promoted often and made him feel he is somehow "winning" by getting her to accept the original debate terms. Huh?

It is what it is. The average citizen has to watch a three month media sprint to the W.H after Biden left.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

What debate? You mean the Kommie infomercial?

 

[rightwinger]

Damn…..You boys are paranoid already

 

[shockedcanadian]

Damn…..You boys are paranoid already

Where have you been the last six months?

I have a bridge for sale, for you, a special price!

 

[rightwinger]

Where have you been the last six months?

I have a bridge for sale, for you, a special price!

What size?

 

[JohnDB]

Damn…..You boys are paranoid already

Trump can be coached, going by previous debate performances, into being passable and coherent. He is not great at debate forums. He misses lots of opportunities where his opposition is weak in an ongoing fashion to make points that do not resonate with voters. Very frustrating for his base.

Harris has yet to perform well even during fluff interviews with softball questions designed to make her look good.
Tulsi Gabbard ate her lunch and supper during the Democrats primary. Her best response was to call Biden a racist.
The latest fluff interview on CNN with a recognized obvious supporter was heavily edited to pull the best moments she had...and yet those were still disastrous.

During her first days as VP she had a VERY difficult time keeping to the same message the White House was issuing. She constantly was harassed about the policy differences between the two of them.

the Debate are past the point of "low expectations with surprising results". It's to the point that we expect screeching and tears with her going on a bender afterwards that will border on alcohol poisoning. People love to watch shark week for the fish getting chewed up by large teeth. Kamala is the bait.

 

[rightwinger]

Trump can be coached, going by previous debate performances, into being passable and coherent. He is not great at debate forums. He misses lots of opportunities where his opposition is weak in an ongoing fashion to make points that do not resonate with voters. Very frustrating for his base.

Harris has yet to perform well even during fluff interviews with softball questions designed to make her look good.
Tulsi Gabbard ate her lunch and supper during the Democrats primary. Her best response was to call Biden a racist.
The latest fluff interview on CNN with a recognized obvious supporter was heavily edited to pull the best moments she had...and yet those were still disastrous.

During her first days as VP she had a VERY difficult time keeping to the same message the White House was issuing. She constantly was harassed about the policy differences between the two of them.

the Debate are past the point of "low expectations with surprising results". It's to the point that we expect screeching and tears with her going on a bender afterwards that will border on alcohol poisoning. People love to watch shark week for the fish getting chewed up by large teeth. Kamala is the bait.

Trump is uncoachable

Harris is a former prosecutor facing a felon and habitual liar

 

[buckeye]

If Kamala was actually presidential material, she would welcome debate, not run from it like a scared school girl.

 

[Donald H]

The success of either candidate in the debate will be decided by the prevailing attitudes of the majority of the voters.

If Americans want fascism, they'll get it!

In the present circumstances, that could be considered to be a change for the better.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Almost guaranteed, the Dems are a political party not a policy party. This is why Trump is a sucker for accepting the debate on ABC and not forcing her on to go onto Fox as well.

He is being played almost certainly which is why they added the additions of notes and sitting down etc, it was to get Trump to the debate by appearing to capitulate. This took the focus off of "three debates" which Trump promoted often and made him feel he is somehow "winning" by getting her to accept the original debate terms. Huh?

It is what it is. The average citizen has to watch a three month media sprint to the W.H after Biden left.

That's a neat story. Lol.

Good grief.

 

[Donald H]

America is ready for Trump. Why suddenly all the pessimism over his ability and chances?

 

[Catsnmeters]

America is ready for Trump. Why suddenly all the pessimism over his ability and chances?

It's panic.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Trump can be coached, going by previous debate performances, into being passable and coherent. He is not great at debate forums. He misses lots of opportunities where his opposition is weak in an ongoing fashion to make points that do not resonate with voters. Very frustrating for his base.

Harris has yet to perform well even during fluff interviews with softball questions designed to make her look good.
Tulsi Gabbard ate her lunch and supper during the Democrats primary. Her best response was to call Biden a racist.
The latest fluff interview on CNN with a recognized obvious supporter was heavily edited to pull the best moments she had...and yet those were still disastrous.

During her first days as VP she had a VERY difficult time keeping to the same message the White House was issuing. She constantly was harassed about the policy differences between the two of them.

the Debate are past the point of "low expectations with surprising results". It's to the point that we expect screeching and tears with her going on a bender afterwards that will border on alcohol poisoning. People love to watch shark week for the fish getting chewed up by large teeth. Kamala is the bait.

She will know the talking points in and out though. Trump will seem evasive when his mind goes to a broader issue or on one of his tangents. It isn't a rally, but he treats it like it is. He has to think back to his university days and structure his arguments sharply in order to win. She is good at regurgitating someone elses words.

I was in the Toastmasters Club when I worked at IBM. Somewhat by default I was nominated to be the "regional representative" and to represent our team. I turned it down, perhaps unwisely because I do enjoy debate and speeches of persuasion, even just to debate and philosophize. There was no benefit to me so I didn't want to put in the effort.

There were small law class debates in High School and of course university required plenty of debate and exchanges of ideas, though far less than I see in U.S university course videos I have watched. To be a good debater you have to answer the question. He needs to address it in a strong manner first, before turning the tables on her, which he likes to do and does fairly well because he understand the Dems weaknesses.

Therefore, focus on your strength first on the policy. The more important the policy for him "economy, the border, abortion, World War III" the more time he should spend on it. The more detailed he should be.

The debate against Biden could have been won by a wider margin if he drilled them with facts, especially facts based on Trumps years. The fallacy that "Trump lost all these jobs while Dems gained" is the worst and one he must debunk in this debate. "During covid our economy didn't lose millions of jobs, they were furloughed because states shut down during covid. Biden just regained those jobs and then used false job stats after record debt for the I.R.A that hurt American workers drastically. Overstated by almost a million jobs. What else did they overstate that we don't hear about"?

I mean this is really childs play. Harris will try to get him off balance with personal attacks, attacking silly things to get his attention. He has to stay focused, because she will just repeat what she practiced.

The media are trying to make this debate bigger than it is because they want the same kind of HR they worked on Biden to get. He thus has to get her off her talking points. Having the mic off could hurt him in the long wrong run but if it keeps him disciplined it will be to his advantage. No crowd? That's absurd if true.

She probably wins this debate, even if it's just an even outcome it will guarantee she doesn't do a second. The media want an easy argument as to why Trump lost the eelction in 2024 against someone with the worst approval rating in history, in a government with the worst approval rating, record inflation, massive personal debt and open borders.

When WWIII begins as Europe continues their decline and inability to assist without any pressure on them, it will not be pretty.

 

[Ava]

If Kamala was actually presidential material, she would welcome debate, not run from it like a scared school girl.

Here are just a few examples of why she runs from public scrutiny.

 

[JohnDB]

Trump is uncoachable

Harris is a former prosecutor facing a felon and habitual liar

This sounds like hopeful wishing moreso than a future prediction based on past performances.

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

If Kamala was actually presidential material, she would welcome debate, not run from it like a scared school girl.

She’s a prop.

 

[Rawley]

Almost guaranteed, the Dems are a political party not a policy party. This is why Trump is a sucker for accepting the debate on ABC and not forcing her on to go onto Fox as well.

He can't "force her"

He needs to get her in front of the American people in an unscripted format, even if just once. The Cackler bombed in a nine minute software interview that the practiced for six weeks. On ABC she's going to have to survive for 90 minutes (even with softball questions).

 

[rightwinger]

This sounds like hopeful wishing moreso than a future prediction based on past performances.

I am confident in the results

Harris is significantly more intelligent than Trump and has a more in depth knowledge of the issues

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

He can't "force her"

He needs to get her in front of the American people in an unscripted format, even if just once. The Cackler bombed in a nine minute software interview that the practiced for six weeks. On ABC she's going to have to survive for 90 minutes (even with softball questions).

The questions will be scripted and her answers will be sent through an earpiece.

 

[shockedcanadian]

He can't "force her"

He needs to get her in front of the American people in an unscripted format, even if just once. The Cackler bombed in a nine minute software interview that the practiced for six weeks. On ABC she's going to have to survive for 90 minutes (even with softball questions).

Yes. They will have the questions ahead of time. The CNN interview was needed from her team, with assistance from Walz only to show that she is NOT perfect. Probably because she didn't know what questions were coming.

In the end, no way big corporate far-left creepy Disney doesn't ensure her teams know the specific questions. When I watched Hillary speak I could tell she prepped for a specific question. it was too refined, too rehearsed.

One can only rehearse in such a manner if they have the questions ahead of time. You can know the general subjects that will be covered, but you can't know a specific question that allows you to answer in an optimal manner.