If Your Health is Ruined Since the COVID Vax, How to Look Up the Deadliness of Your Batch. Did You Draw the 5% of "Hot Lots?"

munkle

Diamond Member
Dec 18, 2012
5,196
8,907
2,130
Very simply, almost all the "adverse events" SO FAR in the CDC's "Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System" (VAERS) are associated with just 5% or so of the Pfizer and Moderna batches put out from 2021 - 2023. Long-term safety still unknown since there were obviously no long-term clinical safety trials, but turbo cancers in young people are on the rise.



1732684252228.png



Turbo cancers:


Every vaccination card has the batch number you received, for each shot. We are talking mostly about the Pfizer and Moderna primary two-shot series. Some of the batches have appalling numbers of death and disability reports to VAERS associated with them, in the double digits. Use the drop-down box to find your batch, then you can see what other people who were given the same batch have experienced.


LOOK UP YOUR BATCH IN How Bad is My Batch

VAERS Reports



Top killer batches
1732684597136.png

1732684618717.png


Expose News


Government Reports prove Pfizer & Moderna purposely manufactured Deadly Batches of the Covid-19 Vaccines

"An investigation of official U.S. Government data, provided by the Centers for Disease Control, has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines numerous times.

This means the deadliest batches of Covid-19 vaccine have now been identified but Medicine Regulators have refused to withdraw them and they are still being administered to the public.

The figures reveal that every single death reported as an adverse reaction to the Covid-19 injections has been caused by just 4 to 5% of the batches of Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines produced.

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the small minority of “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States, while other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations."...

Vaccine injured testimonies, video censored by Youtube


“Over 1,000 Peer-Reviewed Medical Papers of COVID Vaccine Injuries.”
 
Last edited:
The problem with using VAERS that way is you can't correct for the way the jabs were administered.

People who received the vax in a clinical setting are more likely to have an adverse reaction reported to VAERS, compared to people who received it at a CVS or Walgreens, and just went on their way.

Also the batches were not localized- they were split up and distributed over broad geographic areas, which further compounds the inconsistencies in reporting AE's.
 
People who received the vax in a clinical setting are more likely to have an adverse reaction reported to VAERS, compared to people who received it at a CVS or Walgreens, and just went on their way.

Above seems to further support the research findings .

That is , those that received Killer Shots and did not report adverse effects are understating the full nature of these appalling findings .

And I do not understand your last point .
If an individual batch is identifiable it does not matter where it is was used ,imho.
Unless you can produce some very hard evidence that individual batch results were hugely affected by time of use , or, from dramatically different conditions , your contention makes little sense .
 
I got the double dosed Moderna in May 2021, still got Covid twice and experienced adverse shot reaction for two years which ended in late 2023. Totally lost appetite along with 35 pounds in a six week stretch mid 2022, well after any Covid positives.
When the media and health fully stop lying, history will label this as the greatest travesty ever forced upon Americans
 
And I do not understand your last point .
If an individual batch is identifiable it does not matter where it is was used ,imho.
Unless you can produce some very hard evidence that individual batch results were hugely affected by time of use , or, from dramatically different conditions , your contention makes little sense
Because VAERS is just reporting AE's.

If someone receives the jab in the hospital, they are under surveillance. AE's are more likely to be reported in that setting because the person is under medical care.

If a person received the jab in a pharmacy, they are presumably in better health to begin with, and they just go about their business. There is no one monitoring them, and AE's are less likely to be reported to VAERS.

The batches are not localized. Some of the doses will be done in clinical settings, some will not. Same batch, but different odds of reporting AE's due to the way they are administered.

This is what makes drawing conclusions from VAERS problematic. You need to be able to correct for confounding factors, and VAERS does not collect enough information to do that.
 
I got the double dosed Moderna in May 2021, still got Covid twice and experienced adverse shot reaction for two years which ended in late 2023. Totally lost appetite along with 35 pounds in a six week stretch mid 2022, well after any Covid positives.
When the media and health fully stop lying, history will label this as the greatest travesty ever forced upon Americans
And you probably never made a VAERS report. I did not take the jab myself, but I have several family members that did, and also had various adverse reactions. None of them were reported to VAERS (even though they should have been).

This is the problem with using VAERS data to draw conclusions. Plus a lot of those batches were also distributed overseas, and most countries have their own monitoring systems that don't interface with VAERS.

There need to be proper cohort studies done to assess the AE's in a controlled way, but apparently that is not a funding priority...
 
And you probably never made a VAERS report. I did not take the jab myself, but I have several family members that did, and also had various adverse reactions. None of them were reported to VAERS (even though they should have been).

This is the problem with using VAERS data to draw conclusions. Plus a lot of those batches were also distributed overseas, and most countries have their own monitoring systems that don't interface with VAERS.

There need to be proper cohort studies done to assess the AE's in a controlled way, but apparently that is not a funding priority...
I reported it multiple time to about 4 entities with much bullshit pushback about “long Covid” but that stopped mid 2023
 
This gets more amazing .
You prefer them to report happy feelings rather than adverse events?
You seem to have totally lost your grasp on reality .

Quite staggering the lengths that Deniers will go to hang on to their madness .
If you can't understand the limitations inherent in the VAERS reporting, why do you comment?

A single batch of vax can be distributed to multiple States and sometimes other countries, and administered in a wide variety of settings. It is NOT consistent. The reporting is NOT consistent.

If you draw conclusions with the illusion that it IS consistent, your conclusion will be WRONG.

This is NOT a difficult concept to grasp.

The early batches were prioritized to older people, and people in institutionalized settings. This is already a higher risk population, and they are in settings where AE's are more likely to be reported. If the reported AE's were fewer in those batches, that would be a mystery- not the other way around...

Query the database on those "hot" batches, drill down and read the individual reports. I have spent hundreds of hours doing that. It is not what you think.

Even the allowable variation from one jab to another is large- +/- 50% of a dose is allowable. A large portion of the mRNA is destroyed in the act of inoculating the person - it is not a stable molecule to being with. Some of the jabs did almost nothing, others were almost "overdoses". Same batch, differences in administration.

Also I DO NOT advocate for the jab. I did not receive it myself. I do not advise others to get it.

At the same time, I will push back on disinformation, because people need to make their own decision based on the best available information, not bullshit analyses.
 
Last edited:
Very simply, almost all the "adverse events" SO FAR in the CDC's "Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System" (VAERS) are associated with just 5% or so of the Pfizer and Moderna batches put out from 2021 - 2023. Long-term safety still unknown since there were obviously no long-term clinical safety trials, but turbo cancers in young people are on the rise.



View attachment 1047106


Turbo cancers:


Every vaccination card has the batch number you received, for each shot. We are talking mostly about the Pfizer and Moderna primary two-shot series. Some of the batches have appalling numbers of death and disability reports to VAERS associated with them, in the double digits. Use the drop-down box to find your batch, then you can see what other people who were given the same batch have experienced.


LOOK UP YOUR BATCH IN How Bad is My Batch

VAERS Reports



Top killer batches
View attachment 1047108
View attachment 1047109

Expose News


Government Reports prove Pfizer & Moderna purposely manufactured Deadly Batches of the Covid-19 Vaccines

"An investigation of official U.S. Government data, provided by the Centers for Disease Control, has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines numerous times.

This means the deadliest batches of Covid-19 vaccine have now been identified but Medicine Regulators have refused to withdraw them and they are still being administered to the public.

The figures reveal that every single death reported as an adverse reaction to the Covid-19 injections has been caused by just 4 to 5% of the batches of Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines produced.

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the small minority of “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States, while other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations."...

Vaccine injured testimonies, video censored by Youtube


“Over 1,000 Peer-Reviewed Medical Papers of COVID Vaccine Injuries.”


Anything above 2+2 is far too complicated for the low-rent, dumbass rubes LOL
 
If you can't understand the limitations inherent in the VAERS reporting, why do you comment?

A single batch of vax can be distributed to multiple States and sometimes other countries, and administered in a wide variety of settings. It is NOT consistent. The reporting is NOT consistent.

If you draw conclusions with the illusion that it IS consistent, your conclusion will be WRONG.

This is NOT a difficult concept to grasp.

The early batches were prioritized to older people, and people in institutionalized settings. This is already a higher risk population, and they are in settings where AE's are more likely to be reported. If the reported AE's were fewer in those batches, that would be a mystery- not the other way around...

Query the database on those "hot" batches, drill down and read the individual reports. I have spent hundreds of hours doing that. It is not what you think.

Even the allowable variation from one jab to another is large- +/- 50% of a dose is allowable. A large portion of the mRNA is destroyed in the act of inoculating the person - it is not a stable molecule to being with. Some of the jabs did almost nothing, others were almost "overdoses". Same batch, differences in administration.

Also I DO NOT advocate for the jab. I did not receive it myself. I do not advise others to get it.

At the same time, I will push back on disinformation, because people need to make their own decision based on the best available information, not bullshit analyses.
You are whining about an amazing product that saved millions on millions from dying.
 
If you can't understand the limitations inherent in the VAERS reporting, why do you comment?

A single batch of vax can be distributed to multiple States and sometimes other countries, and administered in a wide variety of settings. It is NOT consistent. The reporting is NOT consistent.

If you draw conclusions with the illusion that it IS consistent, your conclusion will be WRONG.

This is NOT a difficult concept to grasp.

The early batches were prioritized to older people, and people in institutionalized settings. This is already a higher risk population, and they are in settings where AE's are more likely to be reported. If the reported AE's were fewer in those batches, that would be a mystery- not the other way around...

Query the database on those "hot" batches, drill down and read the individual reports. I have spent hundreds of hours doing that. It is not what you think.

Even the allowable variation from one jab to another is large- +/- 50% of a dose is allowable. A large portion of the mRNA is destroyed in the act of inoculating the person - it is not a stable molecule to being with. Some of the jabs did almost nothing, others were almost "overdoses". Same batch, differences in administration.

Also I DO NOT advocate for the jab. I did not receive it myself. I do not advise others to get it.

At the same time, I will push back on disinformation, because people need to make their own decision based on the best available information, not bullshit analyses.
I advise one consult with your doctor and not the para bellums.
 
I advise one consult with your doctor and not the para bellums.
You are whining about an amazing product that saved millions on millions from dying.
And you don't know what the hell you are talking about. You don't even comprehend what I wrote in this thread.

I think people should decide for themselves based on the best information available to them.

Do you know the group who is the most vaccine-hesitant are people with phd's? I know several medical professionals who want nothing to do with the mRNA shots.

I have a strong natural immune system, and I took steps to reduce the chances of a severe illness without the jab, and I have not suffered for it. That's me. Not everyone- just me. My decision. I don't make decisions for other people.
 
Very simply, almost all the "adverse events" SO FAR in the CDC's "Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System" (VAERS) are associated with just 5% or so of the Pfizer and Moderna batches put out from 2021 - 2023. Long-term safety still unknown since there were obviously no long-term clinical safety trials, but turbo cancers in young people are on the rise.



View attachment 1047106


Turbo cancers:


Every vaccination card has the batch number you received, for each shot. We are talking mostly about the Pfizer and Moderna primary two-shot series. Some of the batches have appalling numbers of death and disability reports to VAERS associated with them, in the double digits. Use the drop-down box to find your batch, then you can see what other people who were given the same batch have experienced.


LOOK UP YOUR BATCH IN How Bad is My Batch

VAERS Reports



Top killer batches
View attachment 1047108
View attachment 1047109

Expose News


Government Reports prove Pfizer & Moderna purposely manufactured Deadly Batches of the Covid-19 Vaccines

"An investigation of official U.S. Government data, provided by the Centers for Disease Control, has revealed that extremely high numbers of adverse reactions and deaths have been reported against specific lot numbers of the Covid-19 vaccines numerous times.

This means the deadliest batches of Covid-19 vaccine have now been identified but Medicine Regulators have refused to withdraw them and they are still being administered to the public.

The figures reveal that every single death reported as an adverse reaction to the Covid-19 injections has been caused by just 4 to 5% of the batches of Pfizer and Moderna Covid-19 vaccines produced.

But what’s perhaps more concerning is that the small minority of “deadly” lots were distributed widely across the United States, while other “benign” lots were sent to just a few locations."...

Vaccine injured testimonies, video censored by Youtube


“Over 1,000 Peer-Reviewed Medical Papers of COVID Vaccine Injuries.”

 

Forum List

Back
Top