Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Impeachment Trial... Questions phase
- Thread starter Slade3200
- Start date
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,977
- 17,361
- 2,190
- Thread starter
- #182
are you shitting me? Bolton’s lawyer saying it means it came from Bolton. Lawyers don’t say those things without it coming from their client. You’re so dried up from arguments you’re pulling that shit? Go take a nap.No matter what it will be held up in court, so they should have completed the paper work, Bolton never said he would sue his lawyer did! BOLTON SAID NOTHING,, you failed move onYou’re not following... he was asked to talk earlier and he said he would sue... he is now offering to comply. Get it?he would have talked earlier ,, to late nowIt was a strategy... months in court or pursue in the senate. Bolton went from suing to willing to comply. Looking like a smart move at this point. Wouldn’t you agree?Democrats asked for Bolton as a witnessYou're confused in your own conversation, dope.
His lawyer said I will sue you
democrats didn’t follow up
WHOS FAULT IS THAT?
what are you scared of... he’s a conservative do you really think he will lie to the senate and risk his freedom for the opposite party? Or are you scared he will tell the truth?
Jitss617
Diamond Member
- Jan 2, 2019
- 39,095
- 9,330
- 1,340
- Banned
- #183
No it didn’t it came from the lawyerare you shitting me? Bolton’s lawyer saying it means it came from Bolton. Lawyers don’t say those things without it coming from their client. You’re so dried up from arguments you’re pulling that shit? Go take a nap.No matter what it will be held up in court, so they should have completed the paper work, Bolton never said he would sue his lawyer did! BOLTON SAID NOTHING,, you failed move onYou’re not following... he was asked to talk earlier and he said he would sue... he is now offering to comply. Get it?he would have talked earlier ,, to late nowIt was a strategy... months in court or pursue in the senate. Bolton went from suing to willing to comply. Looking like a smart move at this point. Wouldn’t you agree?Democrats asked for Bolton as a witness
His lawyer said I will sue you
democrats didn’t follow up
WHOS FAULT IS THAT?
what are you scared of... he’s a conservative do you really think he will lie to the senate and risk his freedom for the opposite party? Or are you scared he will tell the truth?
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,977
- 17,361
- 2,190
- Thread starter
- #184
Am I kidding? No, because I never made that claim. Don’t put words in my mouth.So if you file to run for office, that makes you immune from investigation?Graham/Cruz - good question... would obama have the right to investigate Mitts son if he had evidence that he was engaged in corruption in Russia.
Schiff - good answer... the DOJ should control and conduct that investigation through their normal process. The president shouldn’t engage in pushing investigations into political rivals.
You're kidding, right?
bripat9643
Diamond Member
- Apr 1, 2011
- 170,170
- 47,325
- 2,180
Yes you did.Am I kidding? No, because I never made that claim. Don’t put words in my mouth.So if you file to run for office, that makes you immune from investigation?Graham/Cruz - good question... would obama have the right to investigate Mitts son if he had evidence that he was engaged in corruption in Russia.
Schiff - good answer... the DOJ should control and conduct that investigation through their normal process. The president shouldn’t engage in pushing investigations into political rivals.
You're kidding, right?
Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,521
- 9,228
- 1,340
You mean like Obama?
Yes there is, turd. I have already quoted itThat is not a valid reason. There is no law , rule or regulation that requires a full vote in the house to issue subpoenas. Pure nonsense.
The president doesn't get to decide how the House conducts investigations or impeachment.
Contempt of Congress - Wikipedia
As announced in Wilkinson v. United States,[9] a Congressional committee must meet three requirements for its subpoenas to be "legally sufficient." First, the committee's investigation of the broad subject area must be authorized by its chamber;
That is not a law, dope.
From your link:
"Congressional rules empower all its standing committees with the authority to compel witnesses to produce testimony and documents for subjects under its jurisdiction. Committee rules may provide for the full committee to issue a subpoena, or permit subcommittees or the chairman (acting alone or with the ranking member) to issue subpoenas."
Who's the dope?
Is the constitution not the supreme law of the land, dope.
There's precedent and under our legal system based on English common law, precedent carries weight under the law.
This ain't France, shitforbrains. And if you need to ask about that, don't you'll just look all the more stupid.
LOL...
There's tons of precedent stating that the president must comply with congressional subpoenas as well, dope.
Name one example of where they refused to turn over anything.
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Dating other men doesn’t count.
Me too. And a video ;-)No one believes that shit, but I got papers to back up my Un-Bullshit!
Me too except for I had a threesome with the prom queen and her runner up... and finished with a 4.2 but who’s countingI dated the prom queen and graduated Suma with a 4.0, loser.
Wow, you’re declaring it a loss for the dems?! I’m shocked. That carries as much weight as your mom telling you that youre smart and good looking.I’m already declaring this as a loss for Democrats. Bored with it and Schiff looks desperate!
Schiff is asking you to
“Throw out The Law, Appeals Courts Don’t Matter, Supreme Court Doesn't Matter. Nothing Matters but what we accuse The President of and We Have Supreme Authority Over Everyone!
If you allow the President to assert his Civil Rights, you as The Senate are Obstructing My Impeachment!”
I’m Out!
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,977
- 17,361
- 2,190
- Thread starter
- #189
No shit. The lawyer representing Bolton, the lawyer speaking for Bolton. That’s my point. Go nap now.No it didn’t it came from the lawyerare you shitting me? Bolton’s lawyer saying it means it came from Bolton. Lawyers don’t say those things without it coming from their client. You’re so dried up from arguments you’re pulling that shit? Go take a nap.No matter what it will be held up in court, so they should have completed the paper work, Bolton never said he would sue his lawyer did! BOLTON SAID NOTHING,, you failed move onYou’re not following... he was asked to talk earlier and he said he would sue... he is now offering to comply. Get it?he would have talked earlier ,, to late nowIt was a strategy... months in court or pursue in the senate. Bolton went from suing to willing to comply. Looking like a smart move at this point. Wouldn’t you agree?
what are you scared of... he’s a conservative do you really think he will lie to the senate and risk his freedom for the opposite party? Or are you scared he will tell the truth?
Hutch Starskey
Diamond Member
- Mar 24, 2015
- 35,521
- 9,228
- 1,340
Schiff never found out HE DIDNT FOLLOW UPThe discussion was about executive privilege, dope.The claim was the subpoenas were invalid.Because SCHIFF DIDNT FOLLOW UP! How is that trumps faultDerp... I just watched the Trump team answer. EP was not mentioned.
Huh?
How does one "follow up" on a claim that was never made?
Get up to speed.
EP would be invoked to the issuing body, dope.
Jitss617
Diamond Member
- Jan 2, 2019
- 39,095
- 9,330
- 1,340
- Banned
- #191
How do you know?No shit. The lawyer representing Bolton, the lawyer speaking for Bolton. That’s my point. Go nap now.No it didn’t it came from the lawyerare you shitting me? Bolton’s lawyer saying it means it came from Bolton. Lawyers don’t say those things without it coming from their client. You’re so dried up from arguments you’re pulling that shit? Go take a nap.No matter what it will be held up in court, so they should have completed the paper work, Bolton never said he would sue his lawyer did! BOLTON SAID NOTHING,, you failed move onYou’re not following... he was asked to talk earlier and he said he would sue... he is now offering to comply. Get it?he would have talked earlier ,, to late now
what are you scared of... he’s a conservative do you really think he will lie to the senate and risk his freedom for the opposite party? Or are you scared he will tell the truth?
The Original Tree
Diamond Member
Again Executive Privilege does not exist and that’s why we never challenged the President on Executive Privilege.
Oh and we don’t need no stinking votes, there is No Law!
We are The Law!
And Dah President is a cheater in the future so you’s gots tah calls us dah witnesses. Cuz he’s gonna cheat it dat der election yessir!
Oh and we don’t need no stinking votes, there is No Law!
We are The Law!
And Dah President is a cheater in the future so you’s gots tah calls us dah witnesses. Cuz he’s gonna cheat it dat der election yessir!
Jitss617
Diamond Member
- Jan 2, 2019
- 39,095
- 9,330
- 1,340
- Banned
- #194
That’s the process .. helloooo mcflySchiff never found out HE DIDNT FOLLOW UPThe discussion was about executive privilege, dope.The claim was the subpoenas were invalid.Because SCHIFF DIDNT FOLLOW UP! How is that trumps fault
Huh?
How does one "follow up" on a claim that was never made?
Get up to speed.
EP would be invoked to the issuing body, dope.
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,977
- 17,361
- 2,190
- Thread starter
- #195
Because I’m a genius.How do you know?No shit. The lawyer representing Bolton, the lawyer speaking for Bolton. That’s my point. Go nap now.No it didn’t it came from the lawyerare you shitting me? Bolton’s lawyer saying it means it came from Bolton. Lawyers don’t say those things without it coming from their client. You’re so dried up from arguments you’re pulling that shit? Go take a nap.No matter what it will be held up in court, so they should have completed the paper work, Bolton never said he would sue his lawyer did! BOLTON SAID NOTHING,, you failed move onYou’re not following... he was asked to talk earlier and he said he would sue... he is now offering to comply. Get it?
what are you scared of... he’s a conservative do you really think he will lie to the senate and risk his freedom for the opposite party? Or are you scared he will tell the truth?
And because that is literally a lawyers job
Jitss617
Diamond Member
- Jan 2, 2019
- 39,095
- 9,330
- 1,340
- Banned
- #196
So you don’t know .. I bet Bolton would have came forward and told you yes truno talked about many things had lots of ideas.. what’s your pointBecause I’m a geniusHow do you know?No shit. The lawyer representing Bolton, the lawyer speaking for Bolton. That’s my point. Go nap now.No it didn’t it came from the lawyerare you shitting me? Bolton’s lawyer saying it means it came from Bolton. Lawyers don’t say those things without it coming from their client. You’re so dried up from arguments you’re pulling that shit? Go take a nap.No matter what it will be held up in court, so they should have completed the paper work, Bolton never said he would sue his lawyer did! BOLTON SAID NOTHING,, you failed move on
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,977
- 17,361
- 2,190
- Thread starter
- #197
you're an idiot then. If his lawyer said that and it wasn’t true then that lawyer would be disbarredSo you don’t know .. I bet Bolton would have came forward and told you yes truno talked about many things had lots of ideas.. what’s your pointBecause I’m a geniusHow do you know?No shit. The lawyer representing Bolton, the lawyer speaking for Bolton. That’s my point. Go nap now.No it didn’t it came from the lawyerare you shitting me? Bolton’s lawyer saying it means it came from Bolton. Lawyers don’t say those things without it coming from their client. You’re so dried up from arguments you’re pulling that shit? Go take a nap.
Jitss617
Diamond Member
- Jan 2, 2019
- 39,095
- 9,330
- 1,340
- Banned
- #198
How do you knowyou're an idiot then. If his lawyer said that and it wasn’t true the. That lawyer would be disbarredSo you don’t know .. I bet Bolton would have came forward and told you yes truno talked about many things had lots of ideas.. what’s your pointBecause I’m a geniusHow do you know?No shit. The lawyer representing Bolton, the lawyer speaking for Bolton. That’s my point. Go nap now.No it didn’t it came from the lawyer
sartre play
Gold Member
- May 4, 2015
- 10,366
- 3,275
- 210
In fact he did not write the art of the deal, & the book was a good read but not fact driven.
Slade3200
Diamond Member
- Jan 13, 2016
- 67,977
- 17,361
- 2,190
- Thread starter
- #200
Ok, enough trolling for you... I’m out of food.How do you knowyou're an idiot then. If his lawyer said that and it wasn’t true the. That lawyer would be disbarredSo you don’t know .. I bet Bolton would have came forward and told you yes truno talked about many things had lots of ideas.. what’s your pointBecause I’m a geniusHow do you know?No shit. The lawyer representing Bolton, the lawyer speaking for Bolton. That’s my point. Go nap now.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 78
- Views
- 755
- Replies
- 30
- Views
- 306
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 89
- Replies
- 214
- Views
- 2K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 0
- Views
- 4
- Replies
- 266
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 108
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8750
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 485
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-