Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 67,504
- 58,068
- 3,615
The “if” is for a court to decide, but your House Clowns were too scared to go to court.If they are all invalid they can all be challenged on that basis.And the Executive Branch has the authority to challenge them, Short Bus Rider.
Not all of them in one fell swoop. That has never been done. The authority of congress to issue subpoenas is well established.If they are all invalid they can all be challenged on that basis.
Hmm...."If" is the operative word. Certainly those issued after the passage of the House resolution could not be covered by that excuse. Right?
Why?
No. The court does not need to decide what is patently false. Obviously those were not "invalid". Again, no other president has ignored every subpoena and tried to use such specious arguments to do so.
Obviously those were not "invalid".
Hmmmm...............
Do I take the OPINION of an alt-left, single digit IQ hack on some low rent messageboard...............or wait for the ruling of the courts.............
It's a coin toss...................
![banana :banana: :banana:](/styles/smilies/banana.gif)