In Order to Cut U.S. military spending dramatically would you be willing to......

[Mac-7]

Well one small strategic nuke, with fallout would pretty much prevent moronic Americans from invading.

That quote makes no sense

who is America supposed to be invading?

Yea the quote does make sense, not all nukes wipe out cities. In fact the Us Navy just equipped some missile subs with low yield nukes. So it makes sense to the educated

Pentagon Confirms Low-Yield Nuclear Warhead on Ballistic Missile Sub - USNI News

The Pentagon acknowledged Tuesday it had indeed deployed at least one low-yield nuclear warhead on a U.S. Navy submarine.

news.usni.org

So small or low yield nukes have their purpose on the battlefield as no one wants to invade into the fallout

Mainland china claims taiwan as its own territory

it would be like a future democrat president nuking Texas because its still voting republican

 

[esalla]

Well one small strategic nuke, with fallout would pretty much prevent moronic Americans from invading.

That quote makes no sense

who is America supposed to be invading?

Yea the quote does make sense, not all nukes wipe out cities. In fact the Us Navy just equipped some missile subs with low yield nukes. So it makes sense to the educated

Pentagon Confirms Low-Yield Nuclear Warhead on Ballistic Missile Sub - USNI News

The Pentagon acknowledged Tuesday it had indeed deployed at least one low-yield nuclear warhead on a U.S. Navy submarine.

news.usni.org

So small or low yield nukes have their purpose on the battlefield as no one wants to invade into the fallout

Mainland china claims taiwan as its own territory

it would be like a future democrat president nuking Texas because its still voting republican

Do you support your neighbor losing his legs to defend Taiwan?

As for China destroying Taiwan to take it back, they certainly would. You do know that they just welded people into their homes to die right. China has no morals at all, assuming that they do is a major mistake

 

[Jarlaxle]

Beat brain with stick now

Are you on drugs?

What war? Taiwan would last 4 minutes. Or do you want Americans to lose their legs there

I suspect that Taiwan might have a couple of surprises if invaded. Plutonium-239 or Uranium-235, perhaps.

Several hundred anti-ship missiles..

Only need a couple if they're the right kind.

China only has 2 ships


Beat brain with stick now

Tell us again that China can be beat with 2 of the right kind anti ship missiles......

Are you on drugs?

If so beat brain with stick

China, no. An invasion fleet, yes.

 

[esalla]

Beat brain with stick now

Are you on drugs?

What war? Taiwan would last 4 minutes. Or do you want Americans to lose their legs there

I suspect that Taiwan might have a couple of surprises if invaded. Plutonium-239 or Uranium-235, perhaps.

Several hundred anti-ship missiles..

Only need a couple if they're the right kind.

China only has 2 ships


Beat brain with stick now

Tell us again that China can be beat with 2 of the right kind anti ship missiles......

Are you on drugs?

If so beat brain with stick

China, no. An invasion fleet, yes.

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You work for the Biden war team right

 

[Jarlaxle]

Which are there - why?

Are you attempting to make some sort of POINT?

 

[Mac-7]

Do you support your neighbor losing his legs to defend Taiwan?

It wouldn't be first time

See WWII and Korea for recent examples

 

[Mac-7]

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You are mistaken

china has the largest navy now

 

[Jarlaxle]

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You work for the Biden war team right

WHat the fuck are you babbling about now?

 

[Rye Catcher]

...make it the policy of the U.S. to use nuclear weapons liberally if necessary?

Across four separate political discussion boards I see the repeated whining about how the U.S. spends too much on its military. Some have even insisted the U.S. could cut its annual military by 50%.

One of the main things used as a basis for this is President Eisenhower's famed "military industrial complex speech" (actually military industrial governmental complex).

But what almost everyone ignores is that Eisenhower was a big supporter of using nuclear weapons if necessary as a response to conventional military attacks. And Eisenhower took it seriously. When he took office the Korean War was still going on. Eisenhower threatened the Chinese with the use of nuclear weapons. And Ike meant it. He ordered the dropping and detonations of several nuclear weapons across the North Pacific.

So in order to cut the U.S. defense budget by half, would you be willing to support the casual use of nuclear weapons by the U.S.? For example if North Korea attacks South Korea again would you support the U.S. conducted a wide ranging nuclear attack on the North? If Iran attacked Saudi Arabia or tried to close the Straits of Hormuz would you support the U.S. making selected nuclear strikes on Iran?

Don't pretend that if the U.S. cuts its defense budget that the other nations on Earth are simply going to "act nice".

Support evidence that IKE threatened China with the use of Nuclear Weapons.

 

[esalla]

Do you support your neighbor losing his legs to defend Taiwan?

It wouldn't be first time

See WWII and Korea for recent examples

You didn't answer

 

[Moonglow]

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You are mistaken

china has the largest navy now

Yet we have the largest navy ships...

 

[esalla]

...make it the policy of the U.S. to use nuclear weapons liberally if necessary?

Across four separate political discussion boards I see the repeated whining about how the U.S. spends too much on its military. Some have even insisted the U.S. could cut its annual military by 50%.

One of the main things used as a basis for this is President Eisenhower's famed "military industrial complex speech" (actually military industrial governmental complex).

But what almost everyone ignores is that Eisenhower was a big supporter of using nuclear weapons if necessary as a response to conventional military attacks. And Eisenhower took it seriously. When he took office the Korean War was still going on. Eisenhower threatened the Chinese with the use of nuclear weapons. And Ike meant it. He ordered the dropping and detonations of several nuclear weapons across the North Pacific.

So in order to cut the U.S. defense budget by half, would you be willing to support the casual use of nuclear weapons by the U.S.? For example if North Korea attacks South Korea again would you support the U.S. conducted a wide ranging nuclear attack on the North? If Iran attacked Saudi Arabia or tried to close the Straits of Hormuz would you support the U.S. making selected nuclear strikes on Iran?

Don't pretend that if the U.S. cuts its defense budget that the other nations on Earth are simply going to "act nice".

Support evidence that IKE threatened China with the use of Nuclear Weapons.

Dayton is a 13 year old history minor

 

[Mac-7]

Yet we have the largest navy ships...

What?

The age of Dreadnoughts ruling the oceans ended in 1941

 

[esalla]

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You are mistaken

china has the largest navy now

Yet we have the largest navy ships...

 

[esalla]

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You work for the Biden war team right

WHat the fuck are you babbling about now?

Have faith that you will never know.

So are you happy that you will be paying more taxes retard

 

[Mac-7]

You didn't answer

Do I have to draw you a picture?

Yes!

Freedom isnt free

 

[esalla]

You didn't answer

Do I have to draw you a picture?

Yes!

Freedom isnt free

So in your demented mind your neighbor should lose his or her legs fighting for Taiwan's freedom

Get medicated

 

[esalla]

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You are mistaken

china has the largest navy now

That is what I said shirley?

I love high school kids with a computer who think they know something

 

[Moonglow]

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You are mistaken

china has the largest navy now

Yet we have the largest navy ships...

Our aircraft carriers are the largest capital ships in the world. The USS Enterprise I being the largest of the large...

 

[esalla]

So you can defeat the largest navy in the world with 2 anti ship missiles?

You are mistaken

china has the largest navy now

Yet we have the largest navy ships...

Our aircraft carriers are the largest capital ships in the world. The USS Enterprise I being the largest of the large...

Totally false

List of largest ships by gross tonnage - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

But you keep stroking