william the wie
Gold Member
- Nov 18, 2009
- 16,667
- 2,402
- 280
Taking the most famous example of innumeracy: Climate Change; back in 1961 Edward Lorenz refuted this idiocy before it was born and did so in the meteorology Dept. of MIT.
The refutation was quite simple the number of decimal places of the weather model in the primitive computer he was using rounded to six decimal places, the print out of the results rounded to five decimals. When attempting replication of results using the printout numbers the models diverged.
After numerous attempts to debug the program by Lorenz and others the conclusion was reached that Chaos, unpredictability in a deterministic system, existed in all predictive models. "Chaos" by James Gleick explained this problem in simple language back in 1987 in an NYT best seller. At the limit weather and therefore climate change which uses the same data sets could conceivably predict under ideal conditions 90 days out. That the photon emission frequencies of H2O and CO2 do not support any of the Climate Change models yet used is another problem that lies outside of my circle of competence.
Another numeracy problem is real income direction v. what normal people see. What is not normally addressed is real income volatility which is sky-rocketing.
So how much of a threat is innumeracy?
The refutation was quite simple the number of decimal places of the weather model in the primitive computer he was using rounded to six decimal places, the print out of the results rounded to five decimals. When attempting replication of results using the printout numbers the models diverged.
After numerous attempts to debug the program by Lorenz and others the conclusion was reached that Chaos, unpredictability in a deterministic system, existed in all predictive models. "Chaos" by James Gleick explained this problem in simple language back in 1987 in an NYT best seller. At the limit weather and therefore climate change which uses the same data sets could conceivably predict under ideal conditions 90 days out. That the photon emission frequencies of H2O and CO2 do not support any of the Climate Change models yet used is another problem that lies outside of my circle of competence.
Another numeracy problem is real income direction v. what normal people see. What is not normally addressed is real income volatility which is sky-rocketing.
So how much of a threat is innumeracy?