Investigating The Investigators - Durham Barr & The Clown Show

[Dante Reawakened]

It's being said that Bigly Bamboozled Barr directed Dirty Dopey Durham to dramatically expand his brief beyond “investigating the investigators” by opening a financial crimes investigation in the fall of 2019 of President Donald Trump based on a tantalizing tip from Italian authorities.

Oh, the good old days:
I remember how much the Cult-of-Personality & the Wingnutty Fringe kept insisting -- "It's coming. The walls are closing in on Trump's targets! Just you wait and see -- Durham! Durham! Durham! Well Durham fizzled like a Trump power drink - carbonated soda -- left out in the air and the Sun too long.

Trump's Cesspool (the drained swamp became a cesspool), was protecting the Cesspool Turd: , “intentional acts of moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption.”

• Oopsies! The New York Times and other news outlets later misleadingly reported that Durham’s review of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe had turned into a criminal investigation, suggesting that the Durham was zeroing in on the investigators of Trump. In fact, Durham’s criminal probe involved Trump himself. Barr never sought to correct the widespread public misperception:

The news reports, however, were all framed around the erroneous assumption that the criminal investigation must mean Mr. Durham had found evidence of potential crimes by officials involved in the Russia inquiry. Mr. Barr, who weighed in publicly about the Durham inquiry at regular intervals in ways that advanced a pro-Trump narrative, chose in this instance not to clarify what was really happening.

quote: By summer 2020, it was clear that the hunt for evidence supporting Mr. Barr’s hunch about intelligence abuses had failed. But he waited until after the 2020 election to publicly concede that there had turned out to be no sign of “foreign government activity” and that the C.I.A. had “stayed in its lane” after all.

MSN

www.msn.com

...

How Barr’s Quest to Find Flaws in the Russia Inquiry Unraveled​

The review by John Durham at one point veered into a criminal investigation related to Donald Trump himself, even as it failed to find wrongdoing in the origins of the Russia inquiry.

How Barr’s Quest to Find Flaws in the Russia Inquiry Unraveled (Published 2023)

The review by John Durham at one point veered into a criminal investigation related to Donald Trump himself, even as it failed to find wrongdoing in the origins of the Russia inquiry.

www.nytimes.com

Clown car occupant #27:

MSN

www.msn.com

 

[Dante Reawakened]

reminds me of how some members don't understand the basics of a 'disagree' button -- what it actually means. Disliking is not equal to disagreeing.

the world of Trumpland and it's alternative facts ...

never mind. I guess there has to be a place for whackos to congregate outside of the failing PRAVDA /Truth Social

 

[Hellokitty]

Um all this shows is how the Durham investigation was just another fishing expedition to try and find a crime to charge TRUMP with.

Barr investigates rumors about TRUMP while ignoring recorded video and eyewitness accounts of corruption involving the Biden's.

 

[BlindBoo]

Um all this shows is how the Durham investigation was just another fishing expedition to try and find a crime to charge TRUMP with.

Barr investigates rumors about TRUMP while ignoring recorded video and eyewitness accounts of corruption involving the Biden's.

Not really. It shows how Faux and friends lied by omission to the Qult, and Barr allowed the lie that the criminal investigation involved the targets of the original probe. Instead of assigning a different prosecutor and allowing Durham to investigate it, he could say without lying that Durham was now investigating criminal activity that came out of their political probe without saying it was a criminal investigation into Trump.

Turn off Faux. It's bad news for Americans.

 

[Dante Reawakened]

It's being said that Bigly Bamboozled Barr directed Dirty Dopey Durham to dramatically expand his brief beyond “investigating the investigators” by opening a financial crimes investigation in the fall of 2019 of President Donald Trump based on a tantalizing tip from Italian authorities.

Oh, the good old days:
I remember how much the Cult-of-Personality & the Wingnutty Fringe kept insisting -- "It's coming. The walls are closing in on Trump's targets! Just you wait and see -- Durham! Durham! Durham! Well Durham fizzled like a Trump power drink - carbonated soda -- left out in the air and the Sun too long.

Trump's Cesspool (the drained swamp became a cesspool), was protecting the Cesspool Turd: , “intentional acts of moral turpitude, dishonesty, or corruption.”

• Oopsies! The New York Times and other news outlets later misleadingly reported that Durham’s review of the origins of the Trump-Russia probe had turned into a criminal investigation, suggesting that the Durham was zeroing in on the investigators of Trump. In fact, Durham’s criminal probe involved Trump himself. Barr never sought to correct the widespread public misperception:

quote: By summer 2020, it was clear that the hunt for evidence supporting Mr. Barr’s hunch about intelligence abuses had failed. But he waited until after the 2020 election to publicly concede that there had turned out to be no sign of “foreign government activity” and that the C.I.A. had “stayed in its lane” after all.

MSN

www.msn.com

...

How Barr’s Quest to Find Flaws in the Russia Inquiry Unraveled​

The review by John Durham at one point veered into a criminal investigation related to Donald Trump himself, even as it failed to find wrongdoing in the origins of the Russia inquiry.

How Barr’s Quest to Find Flaws in the Russia Inquiry Unraveled (Published 2023)

The review by John Durham at one point veered into a criminal investigation related to Donald Trump himself, even as it failed to find wrongdoing in the origins of the Russia inquiry.

www.nytimes.com

Clown car occupant #27:

MSN

www.msn.com

Now we get Barr and Durham are being mocked as incompetent doofuses

The New York Times reported on the Italian tip on Thursday as part of the newspaper's investigation into the Durham probe and said that Barr and Durham considered the matter too serious to ignore.

Rather than hand the matter over to another prosecutor, Durham investigated and was granted criminal prosecutorial powers by Barr for the first time over the course of his probe, the report said.

However, no charges were brought and the details of that investigation and the supposed Italian tipoff have not been made public. Since The New York Times' article, calls have grown for more information to be made public.

"Barr and Durham are being mocked as incompetent doofuses, yet they actually seem to have quite ably and successfully buried that tip from the Italian government about Trump criminality, so their cover-up project was not a failure," tweeted David Frum of The Atlantic.

John Durham Under Pressure to Disclose Details of Trump Criminal Probe