Is Anthropogenic (Human-Caused) Global Warming/AGW Falsifiable?

[Crick]

BS. Are you aware than 87% of all climate statistics are made up and bear no resemblance to reality?

I had heard that approximately 0.188675% of the way through life.

 

[BackAgain]

Why do you bother to post here?

Why do you? You persuade only the insufferably weak minded. Like apu dumfuk.

 

[Crick]

Why do you? You persuade only the insufferably weak minded. Like apu dumfuk.

You have NO science backing up your position. Abu and I have mountains of it. Is the problem that you don't understand basic science or that you don't like the politics you think is involved?

 

[BackAgain]

You have NO science backing up your position. Abu and I have mountains of it. Is the problem that you don't understand basic science or that you don't like the politics you think is involved?

You don’t either. You don’t know what the fuck you’re babbling about.

It shows.

 

[Crick]

You don’t either. You don’t know what the fuck you’re babbling about.

It shows.

www.IPCC.ch says you are wrong.

 

[BackAgain]

www.IPCC.ch says you are wrong.

Ipcc is part of the problem.

It isn’t part of the proof.

 

[Dagosa]

Nope you showed nobody any such ruing.


False.


Because he disagrees with your pablum puke? Sure, crack. Sure.

So. It’s fully true. Check.


Zzzz. Bitch, please! Don’t take up so much board space with your gibberish.

Idiot.

 

[Dagosa]

Ipcc is part of the problem.

It isn’t part of the proof.

You and every other science illiterate Humper following bozo are part of the problem.

 

[EMH]

www.IPCC.ch says you are wrong.

PARROTING IS NOT SCIENCE
FRAUD IS NOT SCIENCE
FUDGING DATA IS NOT SCIENCE
AVOIDING BASIC CLIMATE QUESTIONS IS NOT SCIENCE

 

[Dagosa]

PARROTING IS NOT SCIENCE
FRAUD IS NOT SCIENCE
FUDGING DATA IS NOT SCIENCE
AVOIDING BASIC CLIMATE QUESTIONS IS NOT SCIENCE

Burp.

 

[Samofvt]

 

[Grumblenuts]

 

[abu afak]

View attachment 1011551
View attachment 1011556​

Your graphic's source says it's from 'integrityvermont' a Vanity website of "Seth Adam Manley." It doesn't deal with the current issue at all.

In Fact:

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐞: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐚𝐝 >𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝐩𝐩𝐦 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐭𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐂𝐎𝟐
"The last time carbon dioxide was so plentiful in our planet's atmosphere was in the Pliocene era, around 3 million years ago... Although the sun's force was about the same, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐚 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝟏𝟓 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐞𝐫 and Arctic summer temperatures were 14° higher than the present day."
Royal Meteorological Society, 2019

The Pliocene: The Last Time Earth had >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2

The Pliocene: >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2

www.rmets.org

`

 

[Dagosa]

View attachment 1011551
View attachment 1011556​

Seth Adam Manley a Republican candidate……

 

[Dagosa]

Your graphic's source says it's from 'integrityvermont' a Vanity website of "Seth Adam Manley." It doesn't deal with the current issue at all.

In Fact:

𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐜𝐞𝐧𝐞: 𝐓𝐡𝐞 𝐋𝐚𝐬𝐭 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐭𝐡 𝐡𝐚𝐝 >𝟒𝟎𝟎 𝐩𝐩𝐦 𝐨𝐟 𝐀𝐭𝐦𝐨𝐬𝐩𝐡𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐜 𝐂𝐎𝟐
"The last time carbon dioxide was so plentiful in our planet's atmosphere was in the Pliocene era, around 3 million years ago... Although the sun's force was about the same, 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐬𝐞𝐚 𝐥𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐥𝐬 𝐰𝐞𝐫𝐞 𝟏𝟓 𝐦𝐞𝐭𝐫𝐞𝐬 𝐡𝐢𝐠𝐡𝐞𝐫 and Arctic summer temperatures were 14° higher than the present day."
Royal Meteorological Society, 2019

The Pliocene: The Last Time Earth had >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2

The Pliocene: >400 ppm of Atmospheric CO2

www.rmets.org

`

His shit actually supports global warming. And deniers don’t even know it.

 

[Grumblenuts]

Stealth Conservatives: Election Truther Gets a Leg Up From Phil Scott

Say hello to Seth Adam Manley, Republican candidate for House in the Chittenden-22 district. Mr. Manley believes the oft-debunked claim that voting machines can be hacked, says global warming is ju…

thevpo.org

 

[abu afak]

His shit actually supports global warming. And deniers don’t even know it.

At what his graph says is "Optimal for Plants" - 1200-2000 PPM CO2 - the poles would likely Melt and sea level at 240' Higher.
Which is Not Optimal for humans.. or NYC, London, Florida, East coast, Gulf Coast, and the world largest city Shanghai (13') which is already just waiting overflow at current level when the lag catches up.
`

 

[Crick]

Ipcc is part of the problem.

It isn’t part of the proof.

What other mainstream science do you reject out of hand?

 

[EMH]

View attachment 1011551
View attachment 1011556​

Actual DATA FACTS about Co2 = it does NOT WARM ANYTHING...


Theory - increasing atmospheric Co2 warms atmosphere

DATA - nope, highly correlated satellite and balloon data showed NO WARMING for decades of rising Co2, until FUDGED in 2005

 

[Dagosa]

At what his graph says is "Optimal for Plants" - 1200-2000 PPM CO2 - the poles would likely Melt and sea level at 240' Higher.
Which is Not Optimal for humans.. or NYC, London, Florida, East coast, Gulf Coast, and the world largest city Shanghai (13') which is already just waiting overflow at current level when the lag catches up.
`

Exactly…it’s the rate of change too fast for our species to adapt. They want to talk about earlier times when early humanoids could not even survive. They are dullards.