Is it ever acceptable to bomb a school or a hospital? (Poll)

Is it ever acceptable to bomb a school or a hospital?

  • Yes

    Votes: 38 64.4%
  • No

    Votes: 21 35.6%

  • Total voters
    59
An act that meets a military objective when weighed against the possibility of harm to civilians.

Now, predictably, you will claim an attack on a formerly-protected structure used unlawfully to conduct warfare out of (thus removing its protected status) is ALWAYS wrong, when I already proved that is not the case.

Do me a favor. Don't. Your one-note song is boring the ass off me, kid.
Close. The military objective must OUTWEIGH the civilian casualties. And attacking hospitals and schools, the civilian casualties far outweigh the military objective, thus making it illegal to target.
 
There is no such thing as "honourable warfare". All war is criminal.
Industrialists and bankers whose fortunes are subsidized by public funding removed any "honor" from war centuries ago.
1725121260101.jpeg

" War Is a Racket is a speech and a 1935 short book by Smedley D. Butler, a retired United States Marine Corps major general and two-time Medal of Honor recipient.[2][3]

"Based on his career military experience, Butler discusses how business interests commercially benefit from warfare. He had been appointed commanding officer of the Gendarmerie during the 1915–1934 United States occupation of Haiti."
War Is a Racket - Wikipedia
 
That quote is inaccurate, so is the source. Israel started as Caanan in the second millennium BC. Then the kingdoms of Israel and Judah from the tenth century BC to 587 BC.
Which has exactly nothing to do with greedy, racist Jews stealing land in Palestine during the 20th and 21st century.

The 3 Stages of Zionism

"In 1904, the Zionist leader Menachem Ussishkin explained, 'without ownership of the land, the land of Israel will never become Jewish.'

"Then he identified the three strategies for acquiring land: purchase, conquest and government requisition..."

"Let’s start with the first stage of Zionism. By 1914, Jews owned about 2% of Palestine and by 1948, they owned about 5.7%, or about 1.5 million dunams of Mandate Palestine's 26.3 million dunams."
 
Which has exactly nothing to do with greedy, racist Jews stealing land in Palestine during the 20th and 21st century.

The 3 Stages of Zionism

"In 1904, the Zionist leader Menachem Ussishkin explained, 'without ownership of the land, the land of Israel will never become Jewish.'

"Then he identified the three strategies for acquiring land: purchase, conquest and government requisition..."

"Let’s start with the first stage of Zionism. By 1914, Jews owned about 2% of Palestine and by 1948, they owned about 5.7%, or about 1.5 million dunams of Mandate Palestine's 26.3 million dunams."
You better be glad I am watching WWE Bash in Berlin with few breaks. Again, Zionism has nothing to do with the ancient history of Israel.
 
I recognize genocide as part of the human condition when wielding the power of government. The US Government has practiced genocide against the Native American people, against the southerners during the US Civil War, against the Japanese in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The Zionists have practiced genocide against the Palestinians in the Nakba back in the 40s or 50s, and pretty much steadily ever since with a sort of crescendo today in Gaza.

The Zionists have practiced genocide against the Palestinians in the Nakba back in the 40s or 50s, and pretty much steadily ever since with a sort of crescendo today in Gaza.

Obviously.
As we can see in the fact that the largest product of Palestine is more Palestinians.
 
Which has exactly nothing to do with greedy, racist Jews stealing land in Palestine during the 20th and 21st century.

The 3 Stages of Zionism

"In 1904, the Zionist leader Menachem Ussishkin explained, 'without ownership of the land, the land of Israel will never become Jewish.'

"Then he identified the three strategies for acquiring land: purchase, conquest and government requisition..."

"Let’s start with the first stage of Zionism. By 1914, Jews owned about 2% of Palestine and by 1948, they owned about 5.7%, or about 1.5 million dunams of Mandate Palestine's 26.3 million dunams."

Which has exactly nothing to do with greedy, racist Jews stealing land in Palestine during the 20th and 21st century.

Which land did the Jews steal from the Ottoman Empire?

"Let’s start with the first stage of Zionism. By 1914, Jews owned about 2% of Palestine and by 1948, they owned about 5.7%, or about 1.5 million dunams of Mandate Palestine's 26.3 million dunams."

And the Arabs owned less than 1%.
 
No I haven't, but my current Israeli Congressman has. He even wore his IDF uniform whilst on duty in the US House, making it clear who he works for.
There is no such thing as an Israeli Congressman. He is an American. You are confused. He served in the US Army.

In January 2015, Mast volunteered with the Israel Defense Forces through Sar-El, working at a base outside Tel Aviv packing medical kits and moving supplies.
 
Last edited:
I recognize genocide as part of the human condition when wielding the power of government. The US Government has practiced genocide against the Native American people, against the southerners during the US Civil War, against the Japanese in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The Zionists have practiced genocide against the Palestinians in the Nakba back in the 40s or 50s, and pretty much steadily ever since with a sort of crescendo today in Gaza.
You really need to seek professional help for these delusions.
 
There is no such thing as "honourable warfare". All war is criminal.

“War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things: the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth a war, is much worse. When a people are used as mere human instruments for firing cannon or thrusting bayonets, in the service and for the selfish purposes of a master, such war degrades a people. A war to protect other human beings against tyrannical injustice; a war to give victory to their own ideas of right and good, and which is their own war, carried on for an honest purpose by their free choice, — is often the means of their regeneration. A man who has nothing which he is willing to fight for, nothing which he cares more about than he does about his personal safety, is a miserable creature who has no chance of being free, unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself. As long as justice and injustice have not terminated their ever-renewing fight for ascendancy in the affairs of mankind, human beings must be willing, when need is, to do battle for the one against the other.”

― John Stuart Mill

Wow, Mill sure nailed your ass to the wall, didn't he?
 
I recognize genocide as part of the human condition when wielding the power of government. The US Government has practiced genocide against the Native American people, against the southerners during the US Civil War, against the Japanese in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. The Zionists have practiced genocide against the Palestinians in the Nakba back in the 40s or 50s, and pretty much steadily ever since with a sort of crescendo today in Gaza.
Words have established, accepted meanings. In no rational way does what's happening in Gaza constitute a genocide.

And you're okay with Hamas seeking to genocide Jews.

What the fuck is wrong with you?
 

Forum List

Back
Top