Is math racist.

JoeMoma

Platinum Member
Nov 22, 2014
23,012
10,748
950
Is it reasonable to believe that there are statistical differences in racial populations. For example, the Asian people of Japan are most likely shorter on average than Caucasian Americans on average. That being said, people usually don't take offense about differences in how tall people are. However, it is taboo to even suggest that there may be stastically differences in other attributes in racial populations. People are afraid to even suggest that one race may have a statistical advantage over another race when that attribute might be used to suggest that one race is superior to another. People don't want to be branded as racist for good reason.

Is it wrong to even study attributes such as IQ ,athletic ability, or other such attributes with regards to racial populations? Is math/statistics racist?
 
Is it reasonable to believe that there are statistical differences in racial populations. For example, the Asian people of Japan are most likely shorter on average than Caucasian Americans on average. That being said, people usually don't take offense about differences in how tall people are. However, it is taboo to even suggest that there may be stastically differences in other attributes in racial populations. People are afraid to even suggest that one race may have a statistical advantage over another race when that attribute might be used to suggest that one race is superior to another. People don't want to be branded as racist for good reason.

Is it wrong to even study attributes such as IQ ,athletic ability, or other such attributes with regards to racial populations? Is math/statistics racist?
Excuse me, but are you daft???
 
If you are referring to the professor who stated this, it is highly offensive. To both the people she suggests are favoured and to those she suggests are disadvantaged.

I would suggest to any parent who has children who are deemed to be disadvantaged by math to find another school. Furthermore, encourage your children to learn and aspire to tackle the tough subjects and tell this offensive women to fly a kite before she sabotages your childs prospects in life.

This professor is an embarrassment and are harmful to these communities. Setting kids up for failure by trying to convince them they are at disadvantage. Typical low performing socialist teacher.
 
Is it reasonable to believe that there are statistical differences in racial populations. For example, the Asian people of Japan are most likely shorter on average than Caucasian Americans on average. That being said, people usually don't take offense about differences in how tall people are. However, it is taboo to even suggest that there may be stastically differences in other attributes in racial populations. People are afraid to even suggest that one race may have a statistical advantage over another race when that attribute might be used to suggest that one race is superior to another. People don't want to be branded as racist for good reason.

Is it wrong to even study attributes such as IQ ,athletic ability, or other such attributes with regards to racial populations? Is math/statistics racist?
In Thailand they have clinics where they break your legs then reset them 2" longer.
 
NO it isn't.

Indians in india made the zero
The arabs made algebra
Which is totally missing the point of the op
If you are referring to the professor who stated this, it is highly offensive. To both the people she suggests are favoured and to those she suggests are disadvantaged.

I would suggest to any parent who has children who are deemed to be disadvantaged by math to find another school. Furthermore, encourage your children to learn and aspire to tackle the tough subjects and tell this offensive women to fly a kite before she sabotages your childs prospects in life.

This professor is an embarrassment and are harmful to these communities. Setting kids up for failure by trying to convince them they are at disadvantage. Typical low performing socialist teacher.
I am not referring to any specific professor. Also, I am in no way suggesting that people do not educate themselves and their children to the best of their abilities. What I am suggesting is that statistical facts are facts regardless of who finds those facts offensive.
 
Is it reasonable to believe that there are statistical differences in racial populations. For example, the Asian people of Japan are most likely shorter on average than Caucasian Americans on average. That being said, people usually don't take offense about differences in how tall people are. However, it is taboo to even suggest that there may be stastically differences in other attributes in racial populations. People are afraid to even suggest that one race may have a statistical advantage over another race when that attribute might be used to suggest that one race is superior to another. People don't want to be branded as racist for good reason.

Is it wrong to even study attributes such as IQ ,athletic ability, or other such attributes with regards to racial populations? Is math/statistics racist?
Excuse me, but are you daft???
Perhaps I am....... Are you skeerd to address the question posed by the OP?
 
Is it reasonable to believe that there are statistical differences in racial populations. For example, the Asian people of Japan are most likely shorter on average than Caucasian Americans on average. That being said, people usually don't take offense about differences in how tall people are. However, it is taboo to even suggest that there may be stastically differences in other attributes in racial populations. People are afraid to even suggest that one race may have a statistical advantage over another race when that attribute might be used to suggest that one race is superior to another. People don't want to be branded as racist for good reason.

Is it wrong to even study attributes such as IQ ,athletic ability, or other such attributes with regards to racial populations? Is math/statistics racist?
at first I wanted to state "how many different ways can the left try to hide the fact that their system of education is that's failing"? and then I realized they only use one way...racism, it is just used in a variety of ways to cover their failings...I will say in their defense that the use of misogyny and xenophobia are starting to creep into their explanations for the failing public education system
 
Is it reasonable to believe that there are statistical differences in racial populations. For example, the Asian people of Japan are most likely shorter on average than Caucasian Americans on average. That being said, people usually don't take offense about differences in how tall people are. However, it is taboo to even suggest that there may be stastically differences in other attributes in racial populations. People are afraid to even suggest that one race may have a statistical advantage over another race when that attribute might be used to suggest that one race is superior to another. People don't want to be branded as racist for good reason.

Is it wrong to even study attributes such as IQ ,athletic ability, or other such attributes with regards to racial populations? Is math/statistics racist?
Excuse me, but are you daft???

That is an excellent question, but I believe daft is an adjective. Therefore it should read are you a daft idiot, or just an idiot?
 
photo_1509596319459.jpg
 
Is it reasonable to believe that there are statistical differences in racial populations. For example, the Asian people of Japan are most likely shorter on average than Caucasian Americans on average. That being said, people usually don't take offense about differences in how tall people are. However, it is taboo to even suggest that there may be stastically differences in other attributes in racial populations. People are afraid to even suggest that one race may have a statistical advantage over another race when that attribute might be used to suggest that one race is superior to another. People don't want to be branded as racist for good reason.

Is it wrong to even study attributes such as IQ ,athletic ability, or other such attributes with regards to racial populations? Is math/statistics racist?
One of the most misunderstood and frequently misused words ever ambitiously excerpted from an important public document is the phrase, ". . . all men are created equal."
 
Is it reasonable to believe that there are statistical differences in racial populations. For example, the Asian people of Japan are most likely shorter on average than Caucasian Americans on average. That being said, people usually don't take offense about differences in how tall people are. However, it is taboo to even suggest that there may be stastically differences in other attributes in racial populations. People are afraid to even suggest that one race may have a statistical advantage over another race when that attribute might be used to suggest that one race is superior to another. People don't want to be branded as racist for good reason.

Is it wrong to even study attributes such as IQ ,athletic ability, or other such attributes with regards to racial populations? Is math/statistics racist?
One of the most misunderstood and frequently misused words ever ambitiously excerpted from an important public document is the phrase, ". . . all men are created equal."
The only opinion thar matters is that of the US Supreme Court.. Yours doesn't count for much.
 

So from what I just read, if we think long term, it is in mankind’s best interest to indeed raise the retirement age. Consider, if low income earners can never retire then we won’t have to pay them retirement from social security. This is great news. They will die off having never collecting any social security, and the sweet kicker is, their low level job can immediately be filled by a younger, very likely more efficient worker. All we have to do now is hope low income workers never get motivated enough to raise out of low income.
 

So from what I just read, if we think long term, it is in mankind’s best interest to indeed raise the retirement age. Consider, if low income earners can never retire then we won’t have to pay them retirement from social security. This is great news. They will die off having never collecting any social security, and the sweet kicker is, their low level job can immediately be filled by a younger, very likely more efficient worker. All we have to do now is hope low income workers never get motivated enough to raise out of low income.
The toons represent a satirical menagerie of
quips showing how misleading statistical analyses can be.
 

So from what I just read, if we think long term, it is in mankind’s best interest to indeed raise the retirement age. Consider, if low income earners can never retire then we won’t have to pay them retirement from social security. This is great news. They will die off having never collecting any social security, and the sweet kicker is, their low level job can immediately be filled by a younger, very likely more efficient worker. All we have to do now is hope low income workers never get motivated enough to raise out of low income.
The toons represent a satirical menagerie of
quips showing how misleading statistical analyses can be.
If math is racist, then so are statistics.
 
2 buckets of fried chicken plus four watermelons equals nine EBT cards is not good math.
Many people of color have traded fried chicken for grilled or rotisserie chicken. But those watermelons are among the healthiest foods on the planet...so we aren't about to give those up. And more pink people use EBT cards than people of color do.
 

So from what I just read, if we think long term, it is in mankind’s best interest to indeed raise the retirement age. Consider, if low income earners can never retire then we won’t have to pay them retirement from social security. This is great news. They will die off having never collecting any social security, and the sweet kicker is, their low level job can immediately be filled by a younger, very likely more efficient worker. All we have to do now is hope low income workers never get motivated enough to raise out of low income.
What about those low level income people who become too unhealthy to keep their jobs? They collect unemployment for 6 months then they are screwed when nobody hires them and they can't collect SS.
 

Forum List

Back
Top