Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
[
So- here is my challenge- show us where you saw Snopes declare that "Fast and Furious" is a phony scandal.
If you can't- well then you have just showed yourself as less reliable than Snopes.
It's called omission. It's more intellectually dishonest than lying.
How could a scandal of the notoriety of F&F NOT be snopes? Is there something they are hiding?
Molon Labe.
right......the old because they didn't say it has to true ploy.....[
So- here is my challenge- show us where you saw Snopes declare that "Fast and Furious" is a phony scandal.
If you can't- well then you have just showed yourself as less reliable than Snopes.
It's called omission. It's more intellectually dishonest than lying.
How could a scandal of the notoriety of F&F NOT be snopes? Is there something they are hiding?
Molon Labe.
The fact that they don't have a single concrete article of the F&F scandal is a travesty. You cannot deny that.
Nice deflection attempt.
of course I can... but there is nothing to deny .....go yell at the tv...right......the old because they didn't say it has to true ploy.....[
So- here is my challenge- show us where you saw Snopes declare that "Fast and Furious" is a phony scandal.
If you can't- well then you have just showed yourself as less reliable than Snopes.
It's called omission. It's more intellectually dishonest than lying.
How could a scandal of the notoriety of F&F NOT be snopes? Is there something they are hiding?
Molon Labe.
The fact that they don't have a single concrete article of the F&F scandal is a travesty. You cannot deny that.
Nice deflection attempt.
Then shouldn't Snopes reveal that there is nothing to the scandal, isn't that their supposed mission, to fact-check? You're telling me that snopes.come fact checks via omission? That's rich.
Uncensored2008 CrusaderFrank Edgetho
Tear this guy a new asshole, my lunch break is over.
of course I can... but there is nothing to deny .....go yell at the tv...right......the old because they didn't say it has to true ploy.....It's called omission. It's more intellectually dishonest than lying.
How could a scandal of the notoriety of F&F NOT be snopes? Is there something they are hiding?
Molon Labe.
The fact that they don't have a single concrete article of the F&F scandal is a travesty. You cannot deny that.
Nice deflection attempt.
Then shouldn't Snopes reveal that there is nothing to the scandal, isn't that their supposed mission, to fact-check? You're telling me that snopes.come fact checks via omission? That's rich.
Uncensored2008 CrusaderFrank Edgetho
Tear this guy a new asshole, my lunch break is over.
Hello.
How's the application to the Air Force Academy coming along? Have you secured your nomination yet?
A lot of modern day piss guzzling rubes who think they are "conservatives", who believe and parrot anything which fits into their biased belief system, think exotic things like "facts" and "reality" are some kind of toxic communist plot.They certainly seem to be biased that way.
Great thread.
Let's start listing cases where Snopes has defended conservatives or called BS on liberals.
If we post 100 such cases....will the OP admit that his thread is stupid? Will it take 200 cases? How many?
Snopes is used to 'debunk' a lot of political issues.exactly what does an opinion of snopes have to do with politics?
Asking if Snopes has a political bias is a political question.
...and yes, Snopes has a liberal bias.
"Is Snopes a Left-Wing Mouthpiece?'
That Snoops often exposes conservative dogma to be false because that dogma is for the most part predicated on lies and myths doesn't make it 'leftwing.'
If Bullshit Manufacturer A manufactured 3 tons of bullshit, and Bullshit Manufacturer B manufactured 869 tons of bullshit, and Snopes shoveled away all 872 tons of bullshit, would you say Snopes has a bias against Bullshit Manufacturer B?
Or does Bullshit Manufacture B just manufacture so much bullshit that it takes a lot more work to clean up Bullshit Manufacture B's bullshit than it does to clean up A's?
Go ahead and provide an example of some liberal manufactured bullshit and then let's see if Snope debunked it.Great thread.
Let's start listing cases where Snopes has defended conservatives or called BS on liberals.
If we post 100 such cases....will the OP admit that his thread is stupid? Will it take 200 cases? How many?
You do grasp that you have to come up with such a case first, right?
Go ahead and provide an example of some liberal manufactured bullshit and then let's see if Snope debunked it.
It tells me you get your info from biased sources. At least snopes does research. The scandalmongers just parrot whatever someone living in the same echo chamber tells them.According to Snopes, IRS, Bengazhi, Fast and Furious, NSA, NDAA, GMO, etc are all phony scandals.
What does that tell you?
How about Fast And Furious, Comrade? How about the IRS missing mail? How about the felony extortion racket run by Obama/Holder known as "Operation Choke Point."
It tells me you get your info from biased sources. At least snopes does research. The scandalmongers just parrot whatever someone living in the same echo chamber tells them.
It is true Obama knew Ayers. But the asinine claims by rubes like you that he supported Ayers' terroristic activities is bogus. Thus, "partly true".Yes, it's certainly a left leaning organization...only when they can't spin their way out of a lefts falsehood, will they stand up for what the right says....as you can see when they call a connection between Bill Ayers and the obomanation...PARTLY TRUE!
snopes.com Barack Obama and Bill Ayers
