Is there "good killing" and "bad killing" ?

[Mohamed]

i read some comments from westerners who condemns slaughtering soldiers in iraqi and syrian army.

so, i wish really to ask them is there good killing and bad killing?

is killing people by bombs and arrows and atomic bombs is good while killing them by knife or sword is bad? and why?

 

[deltex1]

The good and bad is not determined by the weapon used...rather by the relative morality of the combatants. Having said that, I prefer nukes.

 

[Two Thumbs]

good and bad killing isn't weapon based, imo.

If you use a knife; Are you doing to to drag the pain out or quick kill with a shot to the neck bone?

Are you cutting someones head off with a sword b/c it's quick and cheap or b/c you want to put the head on a wire?


All killing is bad and should be avoided except to defend yourself or others from being killed.

 

[TruthSeeker56]

Bad people deserve to be killed.

Good people do not.

Simple enough for you, Mo?

Personally, I couldn't give a camel's ass that the Arabs are killing each other. The more that end up as fertilizer, the better.

One more DROP of American blood lost in the Middle East is one drop too many.

 

[Agit8r]

there is not good killing. there is a narrow margin of acceptable killing.

 

[Youch]

i read some comments from westerners who condemns slaughtering soldiers in iraqi and syrian army.

so, i wish really to ask them is there good killing and bad killing?

is killing people by bombs and arrows and atomic bombs is good while killing them by knife or sword is bad? and why?

Of course there is "good killing" and "bad killing." If I come into your house and kill you, that would be bad. If you came into my house and I killed you, that would be a good killing. Easy day. Using your terms, of course.

Wanna talk about killing terrorists and radical oppressive a-holes? I suspect most of that would be "good killing."

 

[Carlsen]

i read some comments from westerners who condemns slaughtering soldiers in iraqi and syrian army.

so, i wish really to ask them is there good killing and bad killing?

is killing people by bombs and arrows and atomic bombs is good while killing them by knife or sword is bad? and why?

.
If it is my enemy then it is a good killing. If it is not my enemy then it is bad killing. When Irak or Syrien people are killed then it is a bad killing because they are not my enemy


.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Is there "good killing" and "bad killing" ?

Good killing is killing the people I hate. Bad killing is killing the people I like. As with porn, or good and evil, it's in the eye of the beholder.

 

[whitehall]

The United States of America was created in the 1700's while Mohammed's followers were killing each other for religious domination. Here we are in the 21'st century and Mohammed's followers are still living in dirt and killing their women for Sharia violations while the US is the lone superpower in the world. What does that tell you about freedom? If you can't answer the question you are doomed to live in the dirt like your ancestors.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The United States of America was created in the 1700's while Mohammed's followers were killing each other for religious domination. Here we are in the 21'st century and Mohammed's followers are still living in dirt and killing their women for Sharia violations while the US is the lone superpower in the world. What does that tell you about freedom? If you can't answer the question you are doomed to live in the dirt like your ancestors.

The Arabs had streetlights and fountains when Europe lived in mud huts. Pride goeth before the fall...

 

[whitehall]

The United States of America was created in the 1700's while Mohammed's followers were killing each other for religious domination. Here we are in the 21'st century and Mohammed's followers are still living in dirt and killing their women for Sharia violations while the US is the lone superpower in the world. What does that tell you about freedom? If you can't answer the question you are doomed to live in the dirt like your ancestors.

The Arabs had streetlights and fountains when Europe lived in mud huts. Pride goeth before the fall...

Arabia destroyed it's wealth for religious domination. Europe created the renascence while Mohammed's followers were killing each other in Africa.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The United States of America was created in the 1700's while Mohammed's followers were killing each other for religious domination. Here we are in the 21'st century and Mohammed's followers are still living in dirt and killing their women for Sharia violations while the US is the lone superpower in the world. What does that tell you about freedom? If you can't answer the question you are doomed to live in the dirt like your ancestors.

The Arabs had streetlights and fountains when Europe lived in mud huts. Pride goeth before the fall...

Arabia destroyed it's wealth for religious domination. Europe created the renascence while Mohammed's followers were killing each other in Africa.

Learn where they got the math and science from after the Dark Ages, it wasn't from the Catholic Church. You can thank the Muslims for that, they kept alive what the Catholics burned...

 

[Katzndogz]

The Arabs of today are not the descendants of the same Arabs that mapped the skies and had brain surgery. Those Arabs were all killed off by the soldiers of Mohammed. Mostly the scientists and mathematicians were Zoroastrians. It was never being Arab or Persia that made them nomadic killers. It was islam that did that.

 

[whitehall]

The Arabs had streetlights and fountains when Europe lived in mud huts. Pride goeth before the fall...

Arabia destroyed it's wealth for religious domination. Europe created the renascence while Mohammed's followers were killing each other in Africa.

Learn where they got the math and science from after the Dark Ages, it wasn't from the Catholic Church. You can thank the Muslims for that, they kept alive what the Catholics burned...

Which ever faction of religious craziness dominated the the Dark Ages it seems that the Mohammed philosophy did the most to eradicate learning rather than preserve it.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Arabia destroyed it's wealth for religious domination. Europe created the renascence while Mohammed's followers were killing each other in Africa.

Learn where they got the math and science from after the Dark Ages, it wasn't from the Catholic Church. You can thank the Muslims for that, they kept alive what the Catholics burned...

Which ever faction of religious craziness dominated the the Dark Ages it seems that the Mohammed philosophy did the most to eradicate learning rather than preserve it.

You'd be wrong, but you don't know the history, just like the rest of the morons here.

 

[whitehall]

Learn where they got the math and science from after the Dark Ages, it wasn't from the Catholic Church. You can thank the Muslims for that, they kept alive what the Catholics burned...

Which ever faction of religious craziness dominated the the Dark Ages it seems that the Mohammed philosophy did the most to eradicate learning rather than preserve it.

You'd be wrong, but you don't know the history, just like the rest of the morons here.

Here's the deal, history indicates that Europe was emerging from the dark ages and engaging in the renascence while Mohammed's followers were living in dirt and trying to figure out the most efficient ways of killing women who strayed from the religious orthodoxy of the 6th century. The world of Mohammed's followers hasn't changed. They are still living in a fantasy world where they dominate the world without contributing either intelligence or technology.

 

[turtledude]

There is nothing wrong with shooting people as long as the right people get shot

(Inspector Harry Callahan)

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Which ever faction of religious craziness dominated the the Dark Ages it seems that the Mohammed philosophy did the most to eradicate learning rather than preserve it.

You'd be wrong, but you don't know the history, just like the rest of the morons here.

Here's the deal, history indicates that Europe was emerging from the dark ages and engaging in the renascence while Mohammed's followers were living in dirt and trying to figure out the most efficient ways of killing women who strayed from the religious orthodoxy of the 6th century. The world of Mohammed's followers hasn't changed. They are still living in a fantasy world where they dominate the world without contributing either intelligence or technology.

Case in point...

 

[whitehall]

You'd be wrong, but you don't know the history, just like the rest of the morons here.

Here's the deal, history indicates that Europe was emerging from the dark ages and engaging in the renascence while Mohammed's followers were living in dirt and trying to figure out the most efficient ways of killing women who strayed from the religious orthodoxy of the 6th century. The world of Mohammed's followers hasn't changed. They are still living in a fantasy world where they dominate the world without contributing either intelligence or technology.

Case in point...

Case in point? Were you in a coma for the last 15 years?