Israel MUST stop recieving all USA funds

[progressive hunter]

No, I never said I can point to legislation on privacy.
That is because rights do NOT come from legislation.
It is the other way around.
Legislation has to come from pre-existing rights.
Otherwise the legislation is illegal, autocratic, and must be destroyed.

You need to read up on Common Law history.

Common law | Definition, Origins, Development, & Examples

Common law, the body of customary law, based on judicial decisions and embodied in reports of decided cases, that has been administered by the courts of England since the Middle Ages. From it has evolved the legal systems found in the United States and most of the Commonwealth countries as well.

www.britannica.com

just admit it,, what you are claiming as a right to privacy doesnt exist,,

 

[watchingfromafar]

What God promised to Abraham is Israel. God does not make frivolous promises.

JGalt: please provide a few verses from the bible stating this would thank you in advance.

JGalt: please provide a few verses
-

 

[Rigby5]

It says "other theories" want to point to Arabia as the origin of the semitic languages.

It has nothing to do with Arabs being one people, Hebrews another people, Akkadians, Baylonians, Assyrians, Persians, and all others being different people with different languages and culture and creating their history on the land where their history is known for.

You keep assuming that Jews are only the Hebrews when in reality they are a conglomeration of peoples who lived there in the area and became Jews, like the
Jebusites who were defeated by King David. And any who converted to Judaism afterwards.


No Study anywhere says that all people and all languages in that area have an origin from Arabia or from Arabic.

Your comparison is total nonsense.


Where EXACTLY from your link, does it say that Arabic is the original, mother tongue of all of those people and eventually it branched out into all of those languages?

Sure some others want to claim the Arabian Peninsula as the origin of Semitic languages, but there is no evidence of that.
Nothing compared to the whole city we have of Canaanite Jericho.

And YES, there is one original semitic language, and that means all those speaking variants of that original Semitic language are most likely descendant from the original race.
That not only is almost always true, but we are sure that is true with Canaanites, Babylonians, Akkadians, Assyrians, Phoenicians, Philistines, Edomites, Amorites, Edomites, Hebrew, etc.
They are all the same race originally.
But is NOT true of Persians, who are not Semitic.

Jews do not encourage conversion and do not encourge intermarrying.
But clearly I am saying the current Jews are NOT the original Hebrew.
I am saying the original Hebrew were Arabs, looked like Arabs, and sounded like Arabs.
However current Jews do NOT look like Arabs, have much whiter skin, and do not at all sound like Arabs, having the Germanic Yiddish as their native language.

All studies say that Canaanites, Babylonians, Akkadians, Assyrians, Phoenicians, Philistines, Edomites, Amorites, Edomites, Hebrew, etc. are all related because they all spoke a derivative of the same Arab language, which is Canaanite originally.
And the original Semitic language is NOT Arabic or from the Arabian Peninsula.
The origin of the Arabs is the Levant and the original language is Canaanite.

 

[Rigby5]

just admit it,, what you are claiming as a right to privacy doesnt exist,,

You obviously know nothing about law.
If there were no right to privacy, then you could strip the clothes off anyone you wanted, in public, and it would not matter.
You do not even have an initial beginning to understanding anything at all about law.

You mentioned the US, in the 1800s. Not Mexico or Central and South America.

I corrected you. The British brought the first slaves to what became a British colony known as America in 1619.

The Spaniards tried to enslave the Natives and it did not work out. So they used Africans later.


------------------

Slavery in colonial Spanish America - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

In the vocabulary of the time, each enslaved African who arrived at the Americas was called "Pieza de Indias" (en: a piece of the Indies). The crown issued licenses asientos, to merchants to specifically trade slaves, regulating the trade. During the 16th century, the Spanish colonies were the most important customers of the Atlantic slave trade, claiming several thousands in sales, but other European colonies soon dwarfed these numbers when their demand for enslaved workers began to drive the slave market to unprecedented levels.[25]

Wrong.
The first slaves were brought to the New World by the Spanish, not the English.
{...
Though Portugal was the first to buy slaves out of Africa, Spain was the first country to send them to America. In 1502, a Spaniard named Juan de Cordoba became the first merchant to send an African slave to America, and Spain soon began relying on African slaves for its labor in the New World. Slaves Under Spanish Colonists
...}
The native slaves did work out by the Spanish as well.
The slave trade was simply abolished by the British and Spanish long before the US Civil War.

 

[progressive hunter]

You obviously know nothing about law.
If there were no right to privacy, then you could strip the clothes off anyone you wanted, in public, and it would not matter.
You do not even have an initial beginning to understanding anything at all about law.


Wrong.
The first slaves were brought to the New World by the Spanish, not the English.
{...
Though Portugal was the first to buy slaves out of Africa, Spain was the first country to send them to America. In 1502, a Spaniard named Juan de Cordoba became the first merchant to send an African slave to America, and Spain soon began relying on African slaves for its labor in the New World. Slaves Under Spanish Colonists
...}
The native slaves did work out by the Spanish as well.
The slave trade was simply abolished by the British and Spanish long before the US Civil War.

thats called assault dumbass and has nothing to do with privacy,,

 

[Rigby5]

But the British were not? Awful?

Slavery is slavery.

And the fact that there had to be a civil war in the US......to keep the South's slaves.......well....that was not the Conquistadores.

All slavery is awful. And the Republicans in the US want to bring it back.

I agree the Republicans want to bring back slavery and that is bad, but it is unions that we need in order to stop slavery.

 

[Rigby5]

thats called assault dumbass and has nothing to do with privacy,,

Wrong.
Assault is a generic conglomerate that includes privacy.

 

[progressive hunter]

Wrong.
Assault is a generic conglomerate that includes privacy.

youre a lost cause,,