Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unfortunately, settler colonialism was not illegal at the time of the creation of the US, Canada, Australia, etc.. It was not until the 19th and 20th century that international laws attempted to make a more civilized world. It has been illegal for a hundred years or so.Settler colonialism is not new.I said settler colonialism that is very different than regular colonialism.
Yep. In order to demonize the Jews we have to change the meaning of common words and legal concepts such as colonialism, apartheid, occupation, terrorism, blockade, rights, self-determination, war crime, etc, etc, etc. We have to invent entirely new meanings just so we can demonize the evil Jews.
Clearly. It would go back at least as far back as the invasion of Israel and Judea by the Romans and then by the Arabs. Indeed, it has happened all over the world and is happening right now in at least half a dozen places. The thing is, no one talks about it being evil or immoral or even illegal, unless you are talking about the Jewish people. No one really talks about it at all, unless you are talking about the Jewish people. Certainly no one talks about while reversing the indigenous and the colonizers, unless you are talking about the Jewish people.
Respectfully,
a filthy Jew
WRONG AGAIN you are manipulating to demonise the Jews when no such international law exists to this day. The arab muslims have been practising settler colonisation all over the world in places like the former Yugoslavia, Somalia, Yemen etc
I find your Logic inane,because I am pragmatic over this schism,that somehow makes me a Zionist!!!!!!for fuck sake Shusha what is wrong with you???
Excellent,truthful and accurate post Tinnie...you know why they don't get it...........it is because they try to legitimize Zionist Terrorism by saying Jews...then they call us Anti-Semites..... the problem is for them no matter how they try to legitimize the Filth of Zionist TERRORISM....these Synthetic Jew LOL /Zionists do not and never had the Cultural beliefs of Real Jewish people.....They were created,repeat CREATED by an ATHIEST JEW(Synthetic JEW),Illegal's to Palestine,whose only intention was to bring Barbarity and Murder to the Palestinian people......to take the Palestinians Land.MJB12741, Phoenall, theliq, Indeependent, et al,
Well, this track in the discussion gets us nowhere. Quibbling over the term invasion gets us nowhere. Either the Arab Army came across and international border or not, it is still an invasion.
The term "invasion" is a description of a tactical operation. It is not the political term with consequence. The term you really need to tack down is:
Article 1 Definition of Aggression A/RES/29/3314
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.
Explanatory note: In this Definition the term "State":
Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,
(a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;
(b) Includes the concept of a "group of States" where appropriate.(COMMENT)Zionism | nationalistic movementCould be but that is for others to decide.....but you Zionist have no SACK...JUST SHIT.....get use to it
Zionism, Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”). Though Zionism originated in eastern and central Europe in the latter part of the 19th century, it is in many ways a continuation of the ancient attachment of the Jews and of the Jewish religion to the historical region of Palestine, where one of the hills of ancient Jerusalem was called Zion.
Yes. Another important fact & reason for Israel's right to exist.
The definition or use of the term "Zionist or Zionism" is quite irrelevant. It is a nice adjective to through around, but it is no more meaningful than say the "Black Jews" or the "Rich Jews."
The term "zionism" is made even more ambiguous since it meaning changes over time; just like any other entity that holds to a persuasion. The Zionist of the 1920s when the San Remo Convention met, is different from the Zionist of 1948, and yet again, the Zionist of today. It is a rather useless term except in the most broadest sense.
The reasoning that the pro-Palestinians take the position as they did in 1948 was simple. Like our friend "P F Tinmore" the representative of the Arab Higher Committee insisted at the time --- that nationals of the Arab States could not be regarded as invaders in Palestine. It was only natural that the Palestinians had appealed to their neighbors for assistance in the face of mounting Jewish aggression.
• Nationals of the Arab States = any Arab from the any Arab League member State.
• "Jewish Aggression = any Jewish Immigration into the territory, any attempt to Construct a Jewish Nation Home, and any attempt to exercise self-determination and declare independence --- following the UN adopted Step Preparatory for Independence.
In their eyes --- there is no way the pro-Palestinians can argue otherwise and there is no way for them to see the outcome in their favor.
Most Respectfully,
RAggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State,...
You always get this confused. The Arab armies entered Palestine but they did not attack Palestine. There was no aggression against Palestine. They entered Palestine to defend the Palestinians who were under attack.
Remember, about 300,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homes before the Arab armies intervened.
BTW, I use the term "the Zionists" because that is what they called themselves. You can't use the term "the Jews" anymore than you can use the term "the Germans" when discussing "the Nazis."
That these Zionists all of whom were converted to Judiasm (Synthetics) never had any idea of Palestine,no roots or understanding of the Israelites other than what they were told/here say by there Zionist Controllers......The original MODERN TERRORISTS OF THE WORLD.
Their whole being is built on a LIE,they perpetuate this LIE today,they mindlessly believe in this LIE and think by protecting this LIE they can use their enormous HATRED to try to demean and control others exposing the LIE
Creatures like Pheo,not a Jew according to him......then he tries to say that Judaism and Zionism are the same thing.......I've heard this type of trash talk before,when the Nazis not only said that all Germans were Nazis but Arrogantly said they would rule the world......This type of Delusional Thinking is a Mental Disorder.......often created through GUILT etc,.
As an Organization the Zionists are openly Shameful,deliberately Aggressive and Delusional.............and a Danger to Mankind.steve
I find your Logic inane,because I am pragmatic over this schism,that somehow makes me a Zionist!!!!!!for fuck sake Shusha what is wrong with you???
What is wrong with me is people like you who somehow think its okay to demonize Jews for vague reasons that they are filthy and evil while being unable to accurately define Zionism.
If you define Zionism, as Eloy did, as the desire for an exclusive Jewish State cleansed of Arab Palestinian Muslims and Christians -- then I am not a Zionist. So if you call me filthy, it is not because of what I believe but because I am a Jew.
So tell define Zionism for me so you can be sure I am a Zionist and not just a Jew.
Excellent,truthful and accurate post Tinnie...you know why they don't get it...........it is because they try to legitimize Zionist Terrorism by saying Jews...then they call us Anti-Semites..... the problem is for them no matter how they try to legitimize the Filth of Zionist TERRORISM....these Synthetic Jew LOL /Zionists do not and never had the Cultural beliefs of Real Jewish people.....They were created,repeat CREATED by an ATHIEST JEW(Synthetic JEW),Illegal's to Palestine,whose only intention was to bring Barbarity and Murder to the Palestinian people......to take the Palestinians Land.MJB12741, Phoenall, theliq, Indeependent, et al,
Well, this track in the discussion gets us nowhere. Quibbling over the term invasion gets us nowhere. Either the Arab Army came across and international border or not, it is still an invasion.
The term "invasion" is a description of a tactical operation. It is not the political term with consequence. The term you really need to tack down is:
Article 1 Definition of Aggression A/RES/29/3314
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.
Explanatory note: In this Definition the term "State":
Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,
(a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;
(b) Includes the concept of a "group of States" where appropriate.(COMMENT)Zionism | nationalistic movement
Zionism, Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”). Though Zionism originated in eastern and central Europe in the latter part of the 19th century, it is in many ways a continuation of the ancient attachment of the Jews and of the Jewish religion to the historical region of Palestine, where one of the hills of ancient Jerusalem was called Zion.
Yes. Another important fact & reason for Israel's right to exist.
The definition or use of the term "Zionist or Zionism" is quite irrelevant. It is a nice adjective to through around, but it is no more meaningful than say the "Black Jews" or the "Rich Jews."
The term "zionism" is made even more ambiguous since it meaning changes over time; just like any other entity that holds to a persuasion. The Zionist of the 1920s when the San Remo Convention met, is different from the Zionist of 1948, and yet again, the Zionist of today. It is a rather useless term except in the most broadest sense.
The reasoning that the pro-Palestinians take the position as they did in 1948 was simple. Like our friend "P F Tinmore" the representative of the Arab Higher Committee insisted at the time --- that nationals of the Arab States could not be regarded as invaders in Palestine. It was only natural that the Palestinians had appealed to their neighbors for assistance in the face of mounting Jewish aggression.
• Nationals of the Arab States = any Arab from the any Arab League member State.
• "Jewish Aggression = any Jewish Immigration into the territory, any attempt to Construct a Jewish Nation Home, and any attempt to exercise self-determination and declare independence --- following the UN adopted Step Preparatory for Independence.
In their eyes --- there is no way the pro-Palestinians can argue otherwise and there is no way for them to see the outcome in their favor.
Most Respectfully,
RAggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State,...
You always get this confused. The Arab armies entered Palestine but they did not attack Palestine. There was no aggression against Palestine. They entered Palestine to defend the Palestinians who were under attack.
Remember, about 300,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homes before the Arab armies intervened.
BTW, I use the term "the Zionists" because that is what they called themselves. You can't use the term "the Jews" anymore than you can use the term "the Germans" when discussing "the Nazis."
That these Zionists all of whom were converted to Judiasm (Synthetics) never had any idea of Palestine,no roots or understanding of the Israelites other than what they were told/here say by there Zionist Controllers......The original MODERN TERRORISTS OF THE WORLD.
Their whole being is built on a LIE,they perpetuate this LIE today,they mindlessly believe in this LIE and think by protecting this LIE they can use their enormous HATRED to try to demean and control others exposing the LIE
Creatures like Pheo,not a Jew according to him......then he tries to say that Judaism and Zionism are the same thing.......I've heard this type of trash talk before,when the Nazis not only said that all Germans were Nazis but Arrogantly said they would rule the world......This type of Delusional Thinking is a Mental Disorder.......often created through GUILT etc,.
As an Organization the Zionists are openly Shameful,deliberately Aggressive and Delusional.............and a Danger to Mankind.steve
Calm down, Steve. You sound like a raging lunatic. Are you under psychiatric care? You certainly sound like you are, but are not being given the correct medication to help you. Now join these so-called by you "fake Jews" next Friday night and you might enjoy yourself.
Excellent,truthful and accurate post Tinnie...you know why they don't get it...........it is because they try to legitimize Zionist Terrorism by saying Jews...then they call us Anti-Semites..... the problem is for them no matter how they try to legitimize the Filth of Zionist TERRORISM....these Synthetic Jew LOL /Zionists do not and never had the Cultural beliefs of Real Jewish people.....They were created,repeat CREATED by an ATHIEST JEW(Synthetic JEW),Illegal's to Palestine,whose only intention was to bring Barbarity and Murder to the Palestinian people......to take the Palestinians Land.MJB12741, Phoenall, theliq, Indeependent, et al,
Well, this track in the discussion gets us nowhere. Quibbling over the term invasion gets us nowhere. Either the Arab Army came across and international border or not, it is still an invasion.
The term "invasion" is a description of a tactical operation. It is not the political term with consequence. The term you really need to tack down is:
Article 1 Definition of Aggression A/RES/29/3314
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.
Explanatory note: In this Definition the term "State":
Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,
(a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;
(b) Includes the concept of a "group of States" where appropriate.(COMMENT)Yes. Another important fact & reason for Israel's right to exist.
The definition or use of the term "Zionist or Zionism" is quite irrelevant. It is a nice adjective to through around, but it is no more meaningful than say the "Black Jews" or the "Rich Jews."
The term "zionism" is made even more ambiguous since it meaning changes over time; just like any other entity that holds to a persuasion. The Zionist of the 1920s when the San Remo Convention met, is different from the Zionist of 1948, and yet again, the Zionist of today. It is a rather useless term except in the most broadest sense.
The reasoning that the pro-Palestinians take the position as they did in 1948 was simple. Like our friend "P F Tinmore" the representative of the Arab Higher Committee insisted at the time --- that nationals of the Arab States could not be regarded as invaders in Palestine. It was only natural that the Palestinians had appealed to their neighbors for assistance in the face of mounting Jewish aggression.
• Nationals of the Arab States = any Arab from the any Arab League member State.
• "Jewish Aggression = any Jewish Immigration into the territory, any attempt to Construct a Jewish Nation Home, and any attempt to exercise self-determination and declare independence --- following the UN adopted Step Preparatory for Independence.
In their eyes --- there is no way the pro-Palestinians can argue otherwise and there is no way for them to see the outcome in their favor.
Most Respectfully,
RAggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State,...
You always get this confused. The Arab armies entered Palestine but they did not attack Palestine. There was no aggression against Palestine. They entered Palestine to defend the Palestinians who were under attack.
Remember, about 300,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homes before the Arab armies intervened.
BTW, I use the term "the Zionists" because that is what they called themselves. You can't use the term "the Jews" anymore than you can use the term "the Germans" when discussing "the Nazis."
That these Zionists all of whom were converted to Judiasm (Synthetics) never had any idea of Palestine,no roots or understanding of the Israelites other than what they were told/here say by there Zionist Controllers......The original MODERN TERRORISTS OF THE WORLD.
Their whole being is built on a LIE,they perpetuate this LIE today,they mindlessly believe in this LIE and think by protecting this LIE they can use their enormous HATRED to try to demean and control others exposing the LIE
Creatures like Pheo,not a Jew according to him......then he tries to say that Judaism and Zionism are the same thing.......I've heard this type of trash talk before,when the Nazis not only said that all Germans were Nazis but Arrogantly said they would rule the world......This type of Delusional Thinking is a Mental Disorder.......often created through GUILT etc,.
As an Organization the Zionists are openly Shameful,deliberately Aggressive and Delusional.............and a Danger to Mankind.steve
Calm down, Steve. You sound like a raging lunatic. Are you under psychiatric care? You certainly sound like you are, but are not being given the correct medication to help you. Now join these so-called by you "fake Jews" next Friday night and you might enjoy yourself.
You joining in Hoss ???? LOL steve...ps not Loony just Normal.......I can't help that you are a Zionut...I tell folk I don't like Synthetic "Fake Jews" I'm wrong because I love you man..steve,shit if I was over there I would have a few Jars with you,but don't try to convert me,...I hate plastic,LOL...see ya Hoss.
(COMMENT)That is somewhat correct. I don't think settler colonialism, per se, is illegal. However, many of the processes involved in establishing settler colonialism is."when no such international law exists to this day."
Excellent,truthful and accurate post Tinnie...you know why they don't get it...........it is because they try to legitimize Zionist Terrorism by saying Jews...then they call us Anti-Semites..... the problem is for them no matter how they try to legitimize the Filth of Zionist TERRORISM....these Synthetic Jew LOL /Zionists do not and never had the Cultural beliefs of Real Jewish people.....They were created,repeat CREATED by an ATHIEST JEW(Synthetic JEW),Illegal's to Palestine,whose only intention was to bring Barbarity and Murder to the Palestinian people......to take the Palestinians Land.MJB12741, Phoenall, theliq, Indeependent, et al,
Well, this track in the discussion gets us nowhere. Quibbling over the term invasion gets us nowhere. Either the Arab Army came across and international border or not, it is still an invasion.
The term "invasion" is a description of a tactical operation. It is not the political term with consequence. The term you really need to tack down is:
Article 1 Definition of Aggression A/RES/29/3314(COMMENT)
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.
Explanatory note: In this Definition the term "State":
Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,
(a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;
(b) Includes the concept of a "group of States" where appropriate.
The definition or use of the term "Zionist or Zionism" is quite irrelevant. It is a nice adjective to through around, but it is no more meaningful than say the "Black Jews" or the "Rich Jews."
The term "zionism" is made even more ambiguous since it meaning changes over time; just like any other entity that holds to a persuasion. The Zionist of the 1920s when the San Remo Convention met, is different from the Zionist of 1948, and yet again, the Zionist of today. It is a rather useless term except in the most broadest sense.
The reasoning that the pro-Palestinians take the position as they did in 1948 was simple. Like our friend "P F Tinmore" the representative of the Arab Higher Committee insisted at the time --- that nationals of the Arab States could not be regarded as invaders in Palestine. It was only natural that the Palestinians had appealed to their neighbors for assistance in the face of mounting Jewish aggression.
• Nationals of the Arab States = any Arab from the any Arab League member State.
• "Jewish Aggression = any Jewish Immigration into the territory, any attempt to Construct a Jewish Nation Home, and any attempt to exercise self-determination and declare independence --- following the UN adopted Step Preparatory for Independence.
In their eyes --- there is no way the pro-Palestinians can argue otherwise and there is no way for them to see the outcome in their favor.
Most Respectfully,
RAggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State,...
You always get this confused. The Arab armies entered Palestine but they did not attack Palestine. There was no aggression against Palestine. They entered Palestine to defend the Palestinians who were under attack.
Remember, about 300,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homes before the Arab armies intervened.
BTW, I use the term "the Zionists" because that is what they called themselves. You can't use the term "the Jews" anymore than you can use the term "the Germans" when discussing "the Nazis."
That these Zionists all of whom were converted to Judiasm (Synthetics) never had any idea of Palestine,no roots or understanding of the Israelites other than what they were told/here say by there Zionist Controllers......The original MODERN TERRORISTS OF THE WORLD.
Their whole being is built on a LIE,they perpetuate this LIE today,they mindlessly believe in this LIE and think by protecting this LIE they can use their enormous HATRED to try to demean and control others exposing the LIE
Creatures like Pheo,not a Jew according to him......then he tries to say that Judaism and Zionism are the same thing.......I've heard this type of trash talk before,when the Nazis not only said that all Germans were Nazis but Arrogantly said they would rule the world......This type of Delusional Thinking is a Mental Disorder.......often created through GUILT etc,.
As an Organization the Zionists are openly Shameful,deliberately Aggressive and Delusional.............and a Danger to Mankind.steve
Calm down, Steve. You sound like a raging lunatic. Are you under psychiatric care? You certainly sound like you are, but are not being given the correct medication to help you. Now join these so-called by you "fake Jews" next Friday night and you might enjoy yourself.
You joining in Hoss ???? LOL steve...ps not Loony just Normal.......I can't help that you are a Zionut...I tell folk I don't like Synthetic "Fake Jews" I'm wrong because I love you man..steve,shit if I was over there I would have a few Jars with you,but don't try to convert me,...I hate plastic,LOL...see ya Hoss.
I don't think you realize, Steve, that with your "fake Jew" nonsense, you appear that you belong in the looney bin. However, if you don't mind appearing like a crackpot, then go for it.
Excellent,truthful and accurate post Tinnie...you know why they don't get it...........it is because they try to legitimize Zionist Terrorism by saying Jews...then they call us Anti-Semites..... the problem is for them no matter how they try to legitimize the Filth of Zionist TERRORISM....these Synthetic Jew LOL /Zionists do not and never had the Cultural beliefs of Real Jewish people.....They were created,repeat CREATED by an ATHIEST JEW(Synthetic JEW),Illegal's to Palestine,whose only intention was to bring Barbarity and Murder to the Palestinian people......to take the Palestinians Land.MJB12741, Phoenall, theliq, Indeependent, et al,
Well, this track in the discussion gets us nowhere. Quibbling over the term invasion gets us nowhere. Either the Arab Army came across and international border or not, it is still an invasion.
The term "invasion" is a description of a tactical operation. It is not the political term with consequence. The term you really need to tack down is:
Article 1 Definition of Aggression A/RES/29/3314(COMMENT)
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.
Explanatory note: In this Definition the term "State":
Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,
(a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;
(b) Includes the concept of a "group of States" where appropriate.
The definition or use of the term "Zionist or Zionism" is quite irrelevant. It is a nice adjective to through around, but it is no more meaningful than say the "Black Jews" or the "Rich Jews."
The term "zionism" is made even more ambiguous since it meaning changes over time; just like any other entity that holds to a persuasion. The Zionist of the 1920s when the San Remo Convention met, is different from the Zionist of 1948, and yet again, the Zionist of today. It is a rather useless term except in the most broadest sense.
The reasoning that the pro-Palestinians take the position as they did in 1948 was simple. Like our friend "P F Tinmore" the representative of the Arab Higher Committee insisted at the time --- that nationals of the Arab States could not be regarded as invaders in Palestine. It was only natural that the Palestinians had appealed to their neighbors for assistance in the face of mounting Jewish aggression.
• Nationals of the Arab States = any Arab from the any Arab League member State.
• "Jewish Aggression = any Jewish Immigration into the territory, any attempt to Construct a Jewish Nation Home, and any attempt to exercise self-determination and declare independence --- following the UN adopted Step Preparatory for Independence.
In their eyes --- there is no way the pro-Palestinians can argue otherwise and there is no way for them to see the outcome in their favor.
Most Respectfully,
RAggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State,...
You always get this confused. The Arab armies entered Palestine but they did not attack Palestine. There was no aggression against Palestine. They entered Palestine to defend the Palestinians who were under attack.
Remember, about 300,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homes before the Arab armies intervened.
BTW, I use the term "the Zionists" because that is what they called themselves. You can't use the term "the Jews" anymore than you can use the term "the Germans" when discussing "the Nazis."
That these Zionists all of whom were converted to Judiasm (Synthetics) never had any idea of Palestine,no roots or understanding of the Israelites other than what they were told/here say by there Zionist Controllers......The original MODERN TERRORISTS OF THE WORLD.
Their whole being is built on a LIE,they perpetuate this LIE today,they mindlessly believe in this LIE and think by protecting this LIE they can use their enormous HATRED to try to demean and control others exposing the LIE
Creatures like Pheo,not a Jew according to him......then he tries to say that Judaism and Zionism are the same thing.......I've heard this type of trash talk before,when the Nazis not only said that all Germans were Nazis but Arrogantly said they would rule the world......This type of Delusional Thinking is a Mental Disorder.......often created through GUILT etc,.
As an Organization the Zionists are openly Shameful,deliberately Aggressive and Delusional.............and a Danger to Mankind.steve
Calm down, Steve. You sound like a raging lunatic. Are you under psychiatric care? You certainly sound like you are, but are not being given the correct medication to help you. Now join these so-called by you "fake Jews" next Friday night and you might enjoy yourself.
You joining in Hoss ???? LOL steve...ps not Loony just Normal.......I can't help that you are a Zionut...I tell folk I don't like Synthetic "Fake Jews" I'm wrong because I love you man..steve,shit if I was over there I would have a few Jars with you,but don't try to convert me,...I hate plastic,LOL...see ya Hoss.
I don't think you realize, Steve, that with your "fake Jew" nonsense, you appear that you belong in the looney bin. However, if you don't mind appearing like a crackpot, then go for it.
Huh,considering America could vote in Trump for President and the UK who couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag,why should anyone bother to listen to them.P F Tinmore, et al,
Today, I think there are less than 20 Non-Self-Governing Territories (the official terminology for colonial activity) (NSGTs). The General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 is called the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and is the principle document which guides the UN Special Committee on exclusively on the issue of decolonization. The UN considers assisting the movement for independence in Trust and NSGTs extremely important.
(COMMENT)That is somewhat correct. I don't think settler colonialism, per se, is illegal. However, many of the processes involved in establishing settler colonialism is."when no such international law exists to this day."
In these contemporary times, there is no application of the anti-colonial law or the decolonization policy as related to the Middle East and Israel. The occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) is not considered colonized in the context of the Declaration [A/RES/1514 (XV)].
The attempt by the pro-Palestinian supporters to attach some sort of colonial criminal association to the Arab-Israeli Conflict as it stands today, is simply a frivolous allegation. But even so, it should be noted that being a colonial country is not a war crime, a crime against humanity, or a Crime of Aggression. Both the US and the UK - each Allied Powers - and each still holding NSGTs. It is not a crime or illegal.
Most Respectfully,
R
(COMMENT)Huh,considering America could vote in Trump for President and the UK who couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag,why should anyone bother to listen to them.P F Tinmore, et al,
Today, I think there are less than 20 Non-Self-Governing Territories (the official terminology for colonial activity) (NSGTs). The General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 is called the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and is the principle document which guides the UN Special Committee on exclusively on the issue of decolonization. The UN considers assisting the movement for independence in Trust and NSGTs extremely important.
(COMMENT)That is somewhat correct. I don't think settler colonialism, per se, is illegal. However, many of the processes involved in establishing settler colonialism is."when no such international law exists to this day."
In these contemporary times, there is no application of the anti-colonial law or the decolonization policy as related to the Middle East and Israel. The occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) is not considered colonized in the context of the Declaration [A/RES/1514 (XV)].
The attempt by the pro-Palestinian supporters to attach some sort of colonial criminal association to the Arab-Israeli Conflict as it stands today, is simply a frivolous allegation. But even so, it should be noted that being a colonial country is not a war crime, a crime against humanity, or a Crime of Aggression. Both the US and the UK - each Allied Powers - and each still holding NSGTs. It is not a crime or illegal.
Most Respectfully,
R
Moreover Rocco,with respect to you.....War Crimes and Crimes generally were and still are being committed against the Palestinians.....as various countries have Warrants out against BiBi,for Crimes against Humanity......that's why he will never visit or land in Belgium....they will serve the Writ and Transport him to Den Haag,to the Criminal Court of Justice.........so your claim is not correct,with respect.steve
What I was saying is....that just because the US and the UK saying there is no Crime etc.,who are they to say anything considering,what they have become,not only that both Governments are Lap-Dogs to the Zionist Lobby.theliq, et al,
I think I missed something here.
(COMMENT)Huh,considering America could vote in Trump for President and the UK who couldn't fight their way out of a paper bag,why should anyone bother to listen to them.P F Tinmore, et al,
Today, I think there are less than 20 Non-Self-Governing Territories (the official terminology for colonial activity) (NSGTs). The General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 is called the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and is the principle document which guides the UN Special Committee on exclusively on the issue of decolonization. The UN considers assisting the movement for independence in Trust and NSGTs extremely important.
(COMMENT)That is somewhat correct. I don't think settler colonialism, per se, is illegal. However, many of the processes involved in establishing settler colonialism is."when no such international law exists to this day."
In these contemporary times, there is no application of the anti-colonial law or the decolonization policy as related to the Middle East and Israel. The occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) is not considered colonized in the context of the Declaration [A/RES/1514 (XV)].
The attempt by the pro-Palestinian supporters to attach some sort of colonial criminal association to the Arab-Israeli Conflict as it stands today, is simply a frivolous allegation. But even so, it should be noted that being a colonial country is not a war crime, a crime against humanity, or a Crime of Aggression. Both the US and the UK - each Allied Powers - and each still holding NSGTs. It is not a crime or illegal.
Most Respectfully,
R
Moreover Rocco,with respect to you.....War Crimes and Crimes generally were and still are being committed against the Palestinians.....as various countries have Warrants out against BiBi,for Crimes against Humanity......that's why he will never visit or land in Belgium....they will serve the Writ and Transport him to Den Haag,to the Criminal Court of Justice.........so your claim is not correct,with respect.steve
I totally lost the connection here.
v/r
R
I am not looking at the political opinions of the UN. I am looking at the facts on the ground. Israeli settler colonialism has been ongoing for a hundred years. That is why there has been war for a hundred years.P F Tinmore, et al,
Today, I think there are less than 20 Non-Self-Governing Territories (the official terminology for colonial activity) (NSGTs). The General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 is called the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and is the principle document which guides the UN Special Committee on exclusively on the issue of decolonization. The UN considers assisting the movement for independence in Trust and NSGTs extremely important.
(COMMENT)That is somewhat correct. I don't think settler colonialism, per se, is illegal. However, many of the processes involved in establishing settler colonialism is."when no such international law exists to this day."
In these contemporary times, there is no application of the anti-colonial law or the decolonization policy as related to the Middle East and Israel. The occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) is not considered colonized in the context of the Declaration [A/RES/1514 (XV)].
The attempt by the pro-Palestinian supporters to attach some sort of colonial criminal association to the Arab-Israeli Conflict as it stands today, is simply a frivolous allegation. But even so, it should be noted that being a colonial country is not a war crime, a crime against humanity, or a Crime of Aggression. Both the US and the UK - each Allied Powers - and each still holding NSGTs. It is not a crime or illegal.
Most Respectfully,
R
Actually, study your koranology for why islamists have been at war with each other and with any society that has opposed Islamisms expansionist plans of colonization.I am not looking at the political opinions of the UN. I am looking at the facts on the ground. Israeli settler colonialism has been ongoing for a hundred years. That is why there has been war for a hundred years.P F Tinmore, et al,
Today, I think there are less than 20 Non-Self-Governing Territories (the official terminology for colonial activity) (NSGTs). The General Assembly resolution 1514 (XV) of 14 December 1960 is called the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples and is the principle document which guides the UN Special Committee on exclusively on the issue of decolonization. The UN considers assisting the movement for independence in Trust and NSGTs extremely important.
(COMMENT)That is somewhat correct. I don't think settler colonialism, per se, is illegal. However, many of the processes involved in establishing settler colonialism is."when no such international law exists to this day."
In these contemporary times, there is no application of the anti-colonial law or the decolonization policy as related to the Middle East and Israel. The occupied Palestinian territory (oPt) is not considered colonized in the context of the Declaration [A/RES/1514 (XV)].
The attempt by the pro-Palestinian supporters to attach some sort of colonial criminal association to the Arab-Israeli Conflict as it stands today, is simply a frivolous allegation. But even so, it should be noted that being a colonial country is not a war crime, a crime against humanity, or a Crime of Aggression. Both the US and the UK - each Allied Powers - and each still holding NSGTs. It is not a crime or illegal.
Most Respectfully,
R
(COMMENT)What I was saying is....that just because the US and the UK saying there is no Crime etc.,who are they to say anything considering, what they have become, not only that both Governments are Lap-Dogs to the Zionist Lobby.
Do you have links to that line of crap?MJB12741, Phoenall, theliq, Indeependent, et al,
Well, this track in the discussion gets us nowhere. Quibbling over the term invasion gets us nowhere. Either the Arab Army came across and international border or not, it is still an invasion.
The term "invasion" is a description of a tactical operation. It is not the political term with consequence. The term you really need to tack down is:
Article 1 Definition of Aggression A/RES/29/3314
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.
Explanatory note: In this Definition the term "State":
Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,
(a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;
(b) Includes the concept of a "group of States" where appropriate.(COMMENT)Zionism | nationalistic movement
Zionism, Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”). Though Zionism originated in eastern and central Europe in the latter part of the 19th century, it is in many ways a continuation of the ancient attachment of the Jews and of the Jewish religion to the historical region of Palestine, where one of the hills of ancient Jerusalem was called Zion.
Yes. Another important fact & reason for Israel's right to exist.
The definition or use of the term "Zionist or Zionism" is quite irrelevant. It is a nice adjective to through around, but it is no more meaningful than say the "Black Jews" or the "Rich Jews."
The term "zionism" is made even more ambiguous since it meaning changes over time; just like any other entity that holds to a persuasion. The Zionist of the 1920s when the San Remo Convention met, is different from the Zionist of 1948, and yet again, the Zionist of today. It is a rather useless term except in the most broadest sense.
The reasoning that the pro-Palestinians take the position as they did in 1948 was simple. Like our friend "P F Tinmore" the representative of the Arab Higher Committee insisted at the time --- that nationals of the Arab States could not be regarded as invaders in Palestine. It was only natural that the Palestinians had appealed to their neighbors for assistance in the face of mounting Jewish aggression.
• Nationals of the Arab States = any Arab from the any Arab League member State.
• "Jewish Aggression = any Jewish Immigration into the territory, any attempt to Construct a Jewish Nation Home, and any attempt to exercise self-determination and declare independence --- following the UN adopted Step Preparatory for Independence.
In their eyes --- there is no way the pro-Palestinians can argue otherwise and there is no way for them to see the outcome in their favor.
Most Respectfully,
RAggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State,...
You always get this confused. The Arab armies entered Palestine but they did not attack Palestine. There was no aggression against Palestine. They entered Palestine to defend the Palestinians who were under attack.
Remember, about 300,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homes before the Arab armies intervened.
BTW, I use the term "the Zionists" because that is what they called themselves. You can't use the term "the Jews" anymore than you can use the term "the Germans" when discussing "the Nazis."
They entered the mandate of palestine with the intention of wiping out palestinians and stealing palestinian lands. Isnt that correct, and they made this very clear in the lead up to the invasion. The arab armies had no right to invade the mandate of palestine, and as soon as Israel declared independence the UN should have issued a declaration of war against the arab league unless they turned tail and went home.
Remember the 300,000 figure was plucked out of thin air and included the population of Jordan because the reality was less than 50,000 were actually evicted, and they were all armed terrorists hiding in villages after the Jews had beaten the arab league forces back. The rest were willing evacuee's who left of their own free will when the arab league asked them to as they could not guarantee their safety.
Nothing stopping you from bringing up Zionists, Jews, Germans and the nazi's, you just need to make sure they are used in the correct context and not as you usually use them
I didn't think so.
Excellent,truthful and accurate post Tinnie...you know why they don't get it...........it is because they try to legitimize Zionist Terrorism by saying Jews...then they call us Anti-Semites..... the problem is for them no matter how they try to legitimize the Filth of Zionist TERRORISM....these Synthetic Jew LOL /Zionists do not and never had the Cultural beliefs of Real Jewish people.....They were created,repeat CREATED by an ATHIEST JEW(Synthetic JEW),Illegal's to Palestine,whose only intention was to bring Barbarity and Murder to the Palestinian people......to take the Palestinians Land.MJB12741, Phoenall, theliq, Indeependent, et al,
Well, this track in the discussion gets us nowhere. Quibbling over the term invasion gets us nowhere. Either the Arab Army came across and international border or not, it is still an invasion.
The term "invasion" is a description of a tactical operation. It is not the political term with consequence. The term you really need to tack down is:
Article 1 Definition of Aggression A/RES/29/3314
Aggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations, as set out in this Definition.
Explanatory note: In this Definition the term "State":
Considering also that, since aggression is the most serious and dangerous form of the illegal use of force, being fraught, in the conditions created by the existence of all types of weapons of mass destruction, with the possible threat of a world conflict and all its catastrophic consequences, aggression should be defined at the present stage,
(a) Is used without prejudice to questions of recognition or to whether a State is a member of the United Nations;
(b) Includes the concept of a "group of States" where appropriate.(COMMENT)Zionism | nationalistic movementCould be but that is for others to decide.....but you Zionist have no SACK...JUST SHIT.....get use to it
Zionism, Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”). Though Zionism originated in eastern and central Europe in the latter part of the 19th century, it is in many ways a continuation of the ancient attachment of the Jews and of the Jewish religion to the historical region of Palestine, where one of the hills of ancient Jerusalem was called Zion.
Yes. Another important fact & reason for Israel's right to exist.
The definition or use of the term "Zionist or Zionism" is quite irrelevant. It is a nice adjective to through around, but it is no more meaningful than say the "Black Jews" or the "Rich Jews."
The term "zionism" is made even more ambiguous since it meaning changes over time; just like any other entity that holds to a persuasion. The Zionist of the 1920s when the San Remo Convention met, is different from the Zionist of 1948, and yet again, the Zionist of today. It is a rather useless term except in the most broadest sense.
The reasoning that the pro-Palestinians take the position as they did in 1948 was simple. Like our friend "P F Tinmore" the representative of the Arab Higher Committee insisted at the time --- that nationals of the Arab States could not be regarded as invaders in Palestine. It was only natural that the Palestinians had appealed to their neighbors for assistance in the face of mounting Jewish aggression.
• Nationals of the Arab States = any Arab from the any Arab League member State.
• "Jewish Aggression = any Jewish Immigration into the territory, any attempt to Construct a Jewish Nation Home, and any attempt to exercise self-determination and declare independence --- following the UN adopted Step Preparatory for Independence.
In their eyes --- there is no way the pro-Palestinians can argue otherwise and there is no way for them to see the outcome in their favor.
Most Respectfully,
RAggression is the use of armed force by a State against the sovereignty, territorial integrity or political independence of another State,...
You always get this confused. The Arab armies entered Palestine but they did not attack Palestine. There was no aggression against Palestine. They entered Palestine to defend the Palestinians who were under attack.
Remember, about 300,000 Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from their homes before the Arab armies intervened.
BTW, I use the term "the Zionists" because that is what they called themselves. You can't use the term "the Jews" anymore than you can use the term "the Germans" when discussing "the Nazis."
That these Zionists all of whom were converted to Judiasm (Synthetics) never had any idea of Palestine,no roots or understanding of the Israelites other than what they were told/here say by there Zionist Controllers......The original MODERN TERRORISTS OF THE WORLD.
Their whole being is built on a LIE,they perpetuate this LIE today,they mindlessly believe in this LIE and think by protecting this LIE they can use their enormous HATRED to try to demean and control others exposing the LIE
Creatures like Pheo,not a Jew according to him......then he tries to say that Judaism and Zionism are the same thing.......I've heard this type of trash talk before,when the Nazis not only said that all Germans were Nazis but Arrogantly said they would rule the world......This type of Delusional Thinking is a Mental Disorder.......often created through GUILT etc,.
As an Organization the Zionists are openly Shameful,deliberately Aggressive and Delusional.............and a Danger to Mankind.steve
I note the word PALESTINE............the REST OF THE POST IS UNMITIGATED ZIONIST TERRORIST<>BULLSHITYou do not understand English very well.....what I said was to someone was "For all I know I could be more Jewish than You if I delved deep enough in my ancestory".......That is so far removed from what you are espousing........If I was I would never entertain Filthy Zionism like most of you.More from the lying scum who claimed he was a Jew and then admitted he wasn't?Not Anti Jew(real Jews) but Zionists are a complete curse.......just because you Guys are unable to emancipate your minds from Zionism...that is not my fault...Anti Zionism is not Anti Semitism you fools....Zionists all 11 million of you are a mere drop in the Ocean......but you have Lying Mouths,just admit what you are and Stop trying to make out your Normal,which we know you are not.You mean N.K. Jews dont you, that have it as their end times that the likes of you would be killed first so they can build a stairway to heaven out of your bodies.
ANTI ZIONISM IS THE NEW ANTI SEMITISM AND THE NAZI'S WILL SOON FIND THEY FACE PRISON FOR IT
What an ass you are.
You're probably Muslim.
Hope that is clear enough for you,if not get a brain transplant.
Zionists HATE EVERYONE because their manifest is HATE,and the way you call for Palestinians to be driven in to the sea,is Hypocricy......Anyhow Zionism is a Mental Disorder.I feel Sorry for You
Here you go
Zionism | nationalistic movement
Zionism, Jewish nationalist movement that has had as its goal the creation and support of a Jewish national state in Palestine, the ancient homeland of the Jews (Hebrew: Eretz Yisraʾel, “the Land of Israel”). Though Zionism originated in eastern and central Europe in the latter part of the 19th century, it is in many ways a continuation of the ancient attachment of the Jews and of the Jewish religion to the historical region of Palestine, where one of the hills of ancient Jerusalem was called Zion.
POST IT...unlike you,I am open,honest and have nothing to hide............................Do you really think I could be threatened,intimidated or cowerd by a TWO BIT PEICE OF ZIONIST SHITHEAD LIKE YOU...... You are merely exposing your cowardly RUNTness for all to see.............tWRONG as per usual......how has fiction become fact to you Pheo......that's right,reading your Zionist Mantra Manual again,Christ you really are BoringEgypt was part of the force that intervened to try to stop the ethnic cleansing of the Christians and Muslims of Palestine by the European Zionists. The British were well aware of this. You have been fed Zionist propaganda all your life, you can't accept the truth.
"Declassified UK reports document build-up of conflict, Jewish public's endorsement of their leaders' pro-terrorist stance and declare armies of Arab states were Palestinians' 'only hope'"
"The documents, which have a remarkable contemporary resonance, reveal how British officials looked on as Jewish settlers took over more and more Arab land.
"After an increase in violent attacks by the militant Zionists of the Stern group and Irgun, British officials reported later in 1946: "Arab leaders appear to be still disposed to defer active opposition so long as a chance of a political decision ...It is now obvious that the only hope of regaining their position lies in the regular armies of the Arab states."
British officials predicted war – and Arab defeat – in Palestine in 1948
So how does this show that the arab league didnt invaded the mandate of palestine with the stated intent of mass murdering the Jews and stealing the land that was granted under international laws to the Jews.
And your only source is the anti semitic failing rag the grauniad, that has never reported the truth in the last 5 years
Go away you pompous cretin, while you rot your brain with the hate sites you will never be my equal. I am your superior in every way and dont forget it. I have seen a video of you, and how you blubbered like a baby when proven to be a coward and a liar.
Should I POST IT ON HERE FOR ALL TO SEE ?
Unfortunately, settler colonialism was not illegal at the time of the creation of the US, Canada, Australia, etc.. It was not until the 19th and 20th century that international laws attempted to make a more civilized world. It has been illegal for a hundred years or so.Settler colonialism is not new.Yep. In order to demonize the Jews we have to change the meaning of common words and legal concepts such as colonialism, apartheid, occupation, terrorism, blockade, rights, self-determination, war crime, etc, etc, etc. We have to invent entirely new meanings just so we can demonize the evil Jews.
Clearly. It would go back at least as far back as the invasion of Israel and Judea by the Romans and then by the Arabs. Indeed, it has happened all over the world and is happening right now in at least half a dozen places. The thing is, no one talks about it being evil or immoral or even illegal, unless you are talking about the Jewish people. No one really talks about it at all, unless you are talking about the Jewish people. Certainly no one talks about while reversing the indigenous and the colonizers, unless you are talking about the Jewish people.
Respectfully,
a filthy Jew
WRONG AGAIN you are manipulating to demonise the Jews when no such international law exists to this day. The arab muslims have been practising settler colonisation all over the world in places like the former Yugoslavia, Somalia, Yemen etcwhen no such international law exists to this day.
That is somewhat correct. I don't think settler colonialism, per se, is illegal. However, many of the processes involved in establishing settler colonialism is.
