Jan. 6 Defendant Becomes First To Face Firearms Charge Under Riot Law

[Dana7360]

The conservatives claimed that the insurrection wasn't an insurrection because no one had weapons or firearms.

Which is a lie.

This man is the first to be charged with having a firearm with him at the insurrection. He had a semi automatic firearm with him.

Others had firearms and weapons with them at the insurrection too and will be charged.

Jan. 6 defendant becomes first to face firearms charge under riot law

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Hilarious! The lib circus continues replete with actual real bearded ladies.

 

[Asclepias]

The conservatives claimed that the insurrection wasn't an insurrection because no one had weapons or firearms.

Which is a lie.

This man is the first to be charged with having a firearm with him at the insurrection. He had a semi automatic firearm with him.

Others had firearms and weapons with them at the insurrection too and will be charged.

Jan. 6 defendant becomes first to face firearms charge under riot law

I thought they were claiming everything was peaceful and people were just taking pictures? I cant keep up with all their lies but they are amusing.

 

[Dana7360]

The conservatives claimed that the insurrection wasn't an insurrection because no one had weapons or firearms.

Which is a lie.

This man is the first to be charged with having a firearm with him at the insurrection. He had a semi automatic firearm with him.

Others had firearms and weapons with them at the insurrection too and will be charged.

Jan. 6 defendant becomes first to face firearms charge under riot law

I thought they were claiming everything was peaceful and people were just taking pictures? I cant keep up with all their lies but they are amusing.

I don't think their lies are amusing. They are destructive. Lies are what caused the insurrection in the first place.

It's disgusting that republicans try to claim what happened was just a bunch of tourists taking a tour of the capitol.

It was anything but peaceful.

 

[TNHarley]

If he had a firearm at an "insurrection" why wasnt he charged with insurrection?
Because.
Cult.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Wonder how many of the Portland rioters will be charged with this new law?

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Portland BLM/Antifa Draw Guns on Drivers to Enforce No-Go Zone in Broad Daylight​

 

[DigitalDrifter]

Guns Seized: Antifa Had Two Well Coordinated and Planned Violent Riots on Inauguration Day​

Portland Oregan is a town that is beleaguered with never-ending violent political demonstrations, protests, and riots, that have been recorded at Federal Court Houses, the downtown districts, and also in the suburban neighborhoods, and a large group of rioters used Inauguration Day as a reason to riot last week.

 

[Dana7360]

You far right trump people can whine and complain all you want.

It won't change the honest facts.

This man has been charged with weapons law crimes for bring a weapon to the insurrection.

Nothing you can do or say will change that.

You can personally attack me all you want. You can bring up other situations that have absolutely nothing to do with this situation.

It won't make any difference.

Personally attacking me won't do anything. I won't read your hate.

All you people are doing is showing how immature and irresponsible you are.

Carry on.

 

[Papageorgio]

The conservatives claimed that the insurrection wasn't an insurrection because no one had weapons or firearms.

Which is a lie.

This man is the first to be charged with having a firearm with him at the insurrection. He had a semi automatic firearm with him.

Others had firearms and weapons with them at the insurrection too and will be charged.

Jan. 6 defendant becomes first to face firearms charge under riot law

If found guilty they need t be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law. We have no room for this in our country.

 

[bodecea]

Hilarious! The lib circus continues replete with actual real bearded ladies.

Supporter, eh?

 

[Tommy Tainant]

Why is the right defending these antifa thugs ?

 

[bodecea]

If he had a firearm at an "insurrection" why wasnt he charged with insurrection?
Because.
Cult.

Need an investigation...why are the Republicans stonewalling? What are they hiding?

 

[bodecea]

Why is the right defending these antifa thugs ?

Why are the Republicans blocking an investigation?

 

[Dana7360]

Why is the right defending these antifa thugs ?

Because the thugs aren't antifa.

The thugs are far right trump terrorists.

 

[Papageorgio]

Why is the right defending these antifa thugs ?

Because they weren't antifa terrorists?

 

[WEATHER53]

Chase mostly white protestors to the end of the earth while ignoring BLM arsonists, looters and rioters when in fact advocating for less law enforcement, less responsibility from the bad actors, and more punitive actions against those employed to enforce laws.

 

[StevenC]

If he had a firearm at an "insurrection" why wasnt he charged with insurrection?
Because.
Cult.

Need an investigation...why are the Republicans stonewalling? What are they hiding?

You mean the investigation that allowed them to charge this man?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The conservatives claimed that the insurrection wasn't an insurrection because no one had weapons or firearms.

Which is a lie.

This man is the first to be charged with having a firearm with him at the insurrection. He had a semi automatic firearm with him.

Others had firearms and weapons with them at the insurrection too and will be charged.

Jan. 6 defendant becomes first to face firearms charge under riot law

That will never get passed an evidence suppression hearing and they have NOTHING otherwise.

Man, they got their panties in a wad over Jan 6, didn't they?

Imagine how much shit they will fill their britches with when a REAL insurrection happens.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

Why is the right defending these antifa thugs ?

Why are the Republicans blocking an investigation?

Don't blame that on the dog-shit GOP. The legislative branch is not in charge of prosecuting criminal acts. Ask your boy, the big guy.